- The paper introduces a multi-agent collaboration framework where language-specific agents work together to create a high-quality multilingual instruction dataset for code LLMs.
- Agents utilize generation memory and self-critique mechanisms to improve data quality and explicitly bridge cross-lingual gaps during the data generation process.
- Fine-tuning models like Qwen2.5-xCoder on this collaboratively generated dataset enhances their capability to transfer knowledge between different programming languages, boosting performance on multilingual benchmarks.
The paper "Multi-Agent Collaboration for Multilingual Code Instruction Tuning" (2502.07487) introduces a framework designed to enhance cross-lingual knowledge transfer during the instruction tuning phase of LLMs for code-related tasks. The core issue addressed is the prevalent practice of training or fine-tuning code LLMs in isolation for each programming language, thereby neglecting potential synergies and shared semantic structures across languages.
Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework
The proposed methodology centers around a multi-agent system where each agent specializes in a specific programming language. These language-specific agents collaborate to generate a diverse and high-quality multilingual instruction dataset. The framework aims to bridge the gap between different programming languages by facilitating knowledge transfer during the data generation process itself, prior to the final model fine-tuning stage.
Key components of the framework include:
- Language-Specific Agents: Intelligent components, each possessing expertise in a particular programming language (e.g., Python agent, Java agent, C++ agent).
- Seed Data Generation: Initial instruction data is generated for each language independently, typically derived from existing code snippets. This serves as the starting point for the collaborative process.
- Collaborative Instruction Generation: The core of the framework involves agents "discussing" and collaborating. An agent can propose an instruction relevant to its language. Other agents then attempt to formulate equivalent instructions and solutions in their respective languages. This process explicitly encourages the generation of parallel or related instructions across multiple languages.
- Generation Memory: Each agent maintains a memory of its generated instructions and solutions, along with self-critiques summarizing the merits and faults of its contributions. This memory serves two purposes: (a) it prevents redundant generation and (b) it allows agents to refine their generation strategies based on past successes and failures, potentially improving the quality of subsequent instructions.
- Data Filtering and Selection: The collaboratively generated multilingual instruction data undergoes a quality control process before being used for fine-tuning. The paper implies that high-quality examples exhibiting successful cross-lingual mapping are prioritized.
Data Generation and Knowledge Transfer Mechanism
The process begins by generating initial language-specific instruction-following data. This can be achieved using techniques similar to self-instruct, where code snippets are used as context to prompt an LLM to generate relevant instructions and corresponding code solutions within that specific language.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
|
function generate_seed_data(language, code_snippets):
seed_instructions = []
for snippet in code_snippets:
# Prompt an LLM to generate instruction & solution based on snippet
instruction, solution = generate_instruction_from_snippet(language, snippet)
seed_instructions.append((instruction, solution, language))
return seed_instructions
python_seeds = generate_seed_data("Python", python_code_corpus)
java_seeds = generate_seed_data("Java", java_code_corpus) |
Once seed data is available, the collaborative phase commences. An agent, say the Python agent, might select or generate an instruction like "Write a Python function to calculate the factorial of a number." It shares this instruction (and potentially its solution) with other agents. The Java agent, for instance, would then attempt to create a corresponding instruction and Java code solution: "Write a Java method to calculate the factorial of a number." This might involve translation of the instruction text and adaptation of the code logic to Java syntax and paradigms.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
|
function collaborative_generation(agents, seed_data):
collaborative_dataset = []
# Initialize agents with seed data and memory
for agent in agents:
agent.initialize_memory(seed_data[agent.language])
for iteration in range(NUM_COLLABORATION_STEPS):
proposing_agent = select_agent(agents)
instruction, solution = proposing_agent.propose_instruction()
generated_pairs = [(instruction, solution, proposing_agent.language)]
for responding_agent in agents:
if responding_agent != proposing_agent:
# Attempt to generate equivalent instruction/solution in target language
cross_lingual_instruction, cross_lingual_solution = responding_agent.respond(instruction, solution, proposing_agent.language)
# Self-critique and update memory
critique = responding_agent.critique_generation(cross_lingual_instruction, cross_lingual_solution)
responding_agent.update_memory(cross_lingual_instruction, cross_lingual_solution, critique)
if quality_check(critique): # Check if the generation is deemed high-quality
generated_pairs.append((cross_lingual_instruction, cross_lingual_solution, responding_agent.language))
# Add the set of related instructions/solutions to the dataset
if len(generated_pairs) > 1: # Ensure cross-lingual transfer occurred
collaborative_dataset.append(generated_pairs)
return collaborative_dataset |
The generation memory allows agents to learn from this process. If the Java agent successfully translates a Python concept, it reinforces that pattern. If it fails or produces incorrect code, the critique mechanism flags this, discouraging similar errors in the future. The summarized merits and faults help refine the agent's internal strategies for cross-lingual mapping and code generation.
Model Fine-tuning and Evaluation
The final multilingual instruction dataset, enriched through multi-agent collaboration, is used to fine-tune a base code LLM. In this paper, Qwen2.5-xCoder was the model fine-tuned using this approach. The fine-tuning objective remains standard instruction following, but the dataset now contains explicit cross-lingual links and parallel examples, hypothesized to force the model to learn shared representations and transfer mechanisms between languages.
LFT=−(I1,S1,L1),...,(Ik,Sk,Lk)∈Dcollab∑j=1∑klogP(Sj∣Ij,Model)
where Dcollab is the collaboratively generated dataset containing tuples of instruction (I), solution (S), and language (L).
The effectiveness of this method was evaluated on multilingual programming benchmarks. The paper reports that Qwen2.5-xCoder, fine-tuned using the multi-agent collaborative data, demonstrated superior performance compared to baseline models trained without this cross-lingual collaborative data generation phase. The results suggest improved capabilities in sharing common programming knowledge across different languages, effectively reducing the cross-lingual gap in code understanding and generation tasks. Specific metrics or benchmark details are not fully elaborated here but are present in the original paper's experimental section. The claim is that the collaborative data generation explicitly fosters the learning of transferable skills.
Conclusion
The multi-agent collaboration framework presents a novel approach to data generation for multilingual code instruction tuning. By simulating collaboration between language-specific agents and leveraging generation memory with self-critique, the method produces a dataset enriched with cross-lingual examples. Fine-tuning on this dataset appears to enhance the underlying code LLM's ability to transfer knowledge between programming languages, leading to improved performance on multilingual benchmarks as demonstrated with Qwen2.5-xCoder. This technique offers a pathway to build more versatile code LLMs that better exploit the inherent similarities across programming languages.