When Worse is Better: Navigating the compression-generation tradeoff in visual tokenization (2412.16326v1)

Abstract: Current image generation methods, such as latent diffusion and discrete token-based generation, depend on a two-stage training approach. In stage 1, an auto-encoder is trained to compress an image into a latent space; in stage 2, a generative model is trained to learn a distribution over that latent space. Most work focuses on maximizing stage 1 performance independent of stage 2, assuming better reconstruction always leads to better generation. However, we show this is not strictly true. Smaller stage 2 models can benefit from more compressed stage 1 latents even if reconstruction performance worsens, showing a fundamental trade-off between compression and generation modeling capacity. To better optimize this trade-off, we introduce Causally Regularized Tokenization (CRT), which uses knowledge of the stage 2 generation modeling procedure to embed useful inductive biases in stage 1 latents. This regularization makes stage 1 reconstruction performance worse, but makes stage 2 generation performance better by making the tokens easier to model: we are able to improve compute efficiency 2-3$\times$ over baseline and match state-of-the-art discrete autoregressive ImageNet generation (2.18 FID) with less than half the tokens per image (256 vs. 576) and a fourth the total model parameters (775M vs. 3.1B) as the previous SOTA (LlamaGen).

Analyzing the Compression-Generation Tradeoff in Visual Tokenization

The present paper investigates the intricate balance between compression and generation in modern image synthesis systems, focusing on the two-stage training workflow employed by methods like latent diffusion models and discrete token-based generation. This paper scrutinizes the prevailing assumption that enhancing the image reconstruction capabilities of an auto-encoder model in stage one invariably improves the performance of the stage two generative model. It introduces a nuanced perspective that for certain scenarios, particularly when operating with limited computational resources, the compression of latent representations could be more advantageous compared to perfect reconstruction.

Key Findings and Contributions

1. Compression-Generation Tradeoff: By exploring auto-encoder architectures trained to compress image data into latent spaces, the paper reveals that reduced reconstruction performance—traditionally viewed as a drawback—might facilitate more efficient generative modeling at a later stage. For smaller generative models, this improved efficiency results from using more compact representations.
2. Causally Regularized Tokenization (CRT): The researchers developed CRT, an approach that applies a causal inductive bias during the stage one training of latent representations. This bias, imparted by a lightweight transformer model, results in latents that, while theoretically exhibiting poorer reconstruction fidelity, are easier for stage two models to learn and generate from.
3. Efficiency and Performance Gains: Through CRT, the authors achieved a two-to-three-fold improvement in computational efficiency. This method allows for matching state-of-the-art (SOTA) image generation benchmarks with significantly fewer tokens and reduced model parameters. For instance, they attain a Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) of 2.18 on ImageNet using half the tokens and nearly a quarter of the parameters compared to previous SOTA models.
4. Scaling Laws: The paper also contributes a comprehensive framework grounded in scaling laws, demonstrating that trade-offs between token rate, distortion, and model loss profoundly influence generative outcomes. Empirical analysis indicates that optimal tokenization depends on the stage two model's capacity, fundamentally challenging the received wisdom of emphasizing perfect reconstruction.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

This research disentangles the complexities inherent in multi-stage model pipelines, proposing a shift in the design strategy for auto-encoders. The results advocate for a more holistic approach where the end-stage requirements inform early-stage model decisions. Such insights are not only pivotal for optimizing current generative models but also suggest pathways for innovation in computationally constrained scenarios.

Furthermore, the CRT approach underscores the potential of embedding particular inductive biases into training pipelines, a strategy that could find utility across other AI domains such as natural language processing or audio synthesis. The ability to tailor the complexity of latent spaces in alignment with the capabilities of subsequent models could redefine efficiency benchmarks across various machine learning applications.

Future Directions

The implications of this paper are far-reaching, paving the way for future research endeavors that might:

• Extend the CRT methodology to diffusion models or other generative frameworks.
• Apply and refine the approach for other data modalities, such as video or 3D data.
• Explore further dimensions of model architecture changes that could complement causal inductive biases without compromising efficiency.

In conclusion, this paper provides a compelling case for reevaluating common intuitions about model training pipelines, offering a novel blend of theoretical insight and practical technique to advance the field of image generation. The careful balancing of compression and generation elucidated here is likely to stimulate ongoing discourse and exploration in AI model architectures.