Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Gradient Localization Improves Lifelong Pretraining of Language Models (2411.04448v1)

Published 7 Nov 2024 in cs.CL

Abstract: LLMs trained on web-scale text corpora have been shown to capture world knowledge in their parameters. However, the mechanism by which LLMs store different types of knowledge is poorly understood. In this work, we examine two types of knowledge relating to temporally sensitive entities and demonstrate that each type is localized to different sets of parameters within the LLMs. We hypothesize that the lack of consideration of the locality of knowledge in existing continual learning methods contributes to both: the failed uptake of new information, and catastrophic forgetting of previously learned information. We observe that sequences containing references to updated and newly mentioned entities exhibit larger gradient norms in a subset of layers. We demonstrate that targeting parameter updates to these relevant layers can improve the performance of continually pretraining on language containing temporal drift.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Jared Fernandez (10 papers)
  2. Yonatan Bisk (91 papers)
  3. Emma Strubell (60 papers)

Summary

Gradient Localization Improves Lifelong Pretraining of LLMs

The paper "Gradient Localization Improves Lifelong Pretraining of LLMs" investigates the mechanisms by which LLMs store temporally sensitive knowledge. This paper introduces a novel approach to mitigating the challenges faced by LLMs in continual learning scenarios, particularly focusing on the phenomena of catastrophic forgetting and failure to assimilate new information effectively. The researchers propose that knowledge in LLMs is stored in distinct parameter subsets and that continual learning approaches must consider this granularity to optimize knowledge updating processes.

Key Contributions and Findings

  1. Localization of Knowledge: The authors conducted experiments revealing that different types of entity knowledge are concentrated in specific subsets of parameters within LLMs. This discovery is crucial as it suggests that updating or modifying these parameters can improve the models' ability to adapt to evolving information without undergoing catastrophic forgetting.
  2. Gradient Analysis: The paper found that sequences associated with updated or emerging entities produce larger gradient norms in certain model layers. Utilizing these insights, the authors propose targeting parameter updates to these layers to enhance performance in continual pretraining contexts.
  3. Benchmarking on Temporal Tasks: The researchers employ datasets like TempLAMA and the Entity Cloze By Date (ECBD) to evaluate the models’ capability in adapting to changing temporal knowledge. These datasets feature probing tasks that measure how well a model updates outdated knowledge or incorporates new entity information after continual pretraining.
  4. Proposed Methods: The paper introduces two methods of pretraining optimization:
    • Traced Gradient Layers with Frozen Parameters (TGL + FP): This technique involves freezing model parameters in layers with low relative gradient norms, thus concentrating updates on layers identified as pivotal for knowledge updates.
    • Traced Gradient Layers with Adaptive Learning Rates (TGL + ALR): Here, a per-layer adaptive learning rate is introduced, where learning rates are scaled according to the relative gradient norms, ensuring more significant updates where necessary.

Implications for Future AI Development

The findings imply a shift in how continuous learning methodologies might evolve for LLMs. Considering specific parameter subsets for updates not only improves efficiency but also model accuracy in dynamically changing environments. This refined approach could revolutionize the deployment of LLMs in real-world applications requiring frequent updates, such as news aggregation services, financial forecasting, and social media monitoring.

Looking ahead, one of the primary areas of interest will be further understanding the correlation between gradient behavior with various types of knowledge and tasks. Future research could expand on identifying more granular parameter subsets and optimizing knowledge localization automatically. Improvements on this front could also pave the way for more environmentally sustainable AI systems by reducing the computational burden typically involved in retraining massive LLMs.

In summary, the paper’s approach of leveraging gradient norms to anticipate relevant parameter updates represents an important step toward more intelligent and resource-efficient lifelong learning strategies for LLMs. By honing in on the numerical methods and empirical evaluations presented, researchers can further develop scalable, adaptable, and continually learning AI systems.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com