Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
157 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
8 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Blind Spot Navigation in LLM Reasoning with Thought Space Explorer (2410.24155v2)

Published 31 Oct 2024 in cs.CL

Abstract: Recent advances in LLMs have demonstrated their potential in handling complex reasoning tasks, which are usually achieved by constructing a thought chain to guide the model to solve the problem with multi-step thinking. However, existing methods often remain confined to previously explored solution spaces and thus overlook the critical blind spot within LLMs' cognitive range. To address these issues, we design the Thought Space Explorer (TSE), a novel framework to expand and optimize thought structures to guide LLMs to explore their blind spots of thinking. By generating new reasoning steps and branches based on the original thought structure with various designed strategies, TSE broadens the thought space and alleviates the impact of blind spots for LLM reasoning. Experimental results on multiple levels of reasoning tasks demonstrate the efficacy of TSE. We also conduct extensive analysis to understand how structured and expansive thought can contribute to unleashing the potential of LLM reasoning capabilities.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774.
  2. Graph of thoughts: Solving elaborate problems with large language models. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 17682–17690.
  3. A survey of chain of thought reasoning: Advances, frontiers and future. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15402.
  4. Alphazero-like tree-search can guide large language model decoding and training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17179.
  5. Interpretable contrastive monte carlo tree search reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01707.
  6. Reasoning with language model is planning with world model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14992.
  7. Timetom: Temporal space is the key to unlocking the door of large language models’ theory-of-mind. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01455.
  8. Jie Huang and Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang. 2022. Towards reasoning in large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10403.
  9. Hugging Face. 2024. Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct.
  10. Ziqi Jin and Wei Lu. 2024. Self-harmonized chain of thought. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04057.
  11. Maieutic prompting: Logically consistent reasoning with recursive explanations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11822.
  12. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:22199–22213.
  13. Chain of thought empowers transformers to solve inherently serial problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12875.
  14. Internal consistency and self-feedback in large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14507.
  15. Mind your step (by step): Chain-of-thought can reduce performance on tasks where thinking makes humans worse. Preprint, arXiv:2410.21333.
  16. Logic-of-thought: Injecting logic into contexts for full reasoning in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17539.
  17. Jieyi Long. 2023. Large language model guided tree-of-thought. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08291.
  18. Large language models know your contextual search intent: A prompting framework for conversational search. Preprint, arXiv:2303.06573.
  19. A survey of conversational search. Preprint, arXiv:2410.15576.
  20. Shentong Mo and Miao Xin. 2024. Tree of uncertain thoughts reasoning for large language models. In ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 12742–12746. IEEE.
  21. OpenAI. 2023. Gpt-4. https://openai.com/index/gpt-4-research/.
  22. OpenAI. 2024. GPT-4o-mini: Advancing Cost-Efficient Intelligence. Accessed: 2024-10-05.
  23. The carbon footprint of machine learning training will plateau, then shrink. Computer, 55(7):18–28.
  24. Reflexion: an autonomous agent with dynamic memory and self-reflection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11366, 2(5):9.
  25. To cot or not to cot? chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoning. Preprint, arXiv:2409.12183.
  26. To cot or not to cot? chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12183.
  27. Chain of thoughtlessness: An analysis of cot in planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04776.
  28. Self-information loss compensation learning for machine-generated text detection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021(1):6669468.
  29. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11171.
  30. Xuezhi Wang and Denny Zhou. 2024. Chain-of-thought reasoning without prompting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10200.
  31. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24824–24837.
  32. Beyond chain-of-thought: A survey of chain-of-x paradigms for llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15676.
  33. Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
  34. Prototypical reward network for data-efficient rlhf. Preprint, arXiv:2406.06606.
  35. Ratt: Athought structure for coherent and correct llmreasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02746.
  36. Chain of preference optimization: Improving chain-of-thought reasoning in llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09136.
  37. On the diagram of thought. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.10038.
  38. Solving math word problems via cooperative reasoning induced language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.16257.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper introduces TSE, a framework that broadens LLM reasoning by identifying key nodes and exploring new cognitive paths.
  • It employs a systematic approach using gradient analysis and self-prompting to select influential thought nodes that enhance reasoning processes.
  • The framework integrates new and original reasoning paths to significantly improve performance on complex tasks like Game of 24 and Creative Writing.

Thought Space Explorer: Enhancing LLM Reasoning through Expanded Thought Structures

The paper "Thought Space Explorer: Navigating and Expanding Thought Space for LLM Reasoning" introduces an innovative framework named Thought Space Explorer (TSE), aimed at optimizing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Recent advancements in LLMs have demonstrated their potential in solving complex reasoning tasks, typically addressed using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) methodologies. However, conventional approaches often remain restrained within previously explored solution spaces and overlook unexplored cognitive regions or "blind spots."

TSE is designed to address these limitations by broadening the cognitive range of LLMs, uncovering new reasoning paths and branches, and refining existing thought structures through novel strategies. The key innovation lies in TSE's ability to generate additional reasoning steps and explore unexplored thought spaces, thereby enhancing the reasoning potential of LLMs.

Contributions and Methodology

The core contribution of this work is the development of TSE, which systematically augments thought structures to guide LLMs in overcoming cognitive blind spots. The methodology involves several critical steps:

  1. Key Node Selection: TSE identifies crucial components within existing thought chains that significantly impact predictive outcomes. Techniques like gradient analysis and self-prompting enhance node selection by focusing on nodes that possess substantial influence over reasoning pathways.
  2. Connection and Expansion: After identifying key nodes, TSE employs them as anchors to generate new thought nodes. This step encourages the exploration of new reasoning directions that deviate from previously established thought paths, facilitating the discovery of hitherto ignored solutions.
  3. Collaborative Reasoning: The framework integrates newly generated branches with original thought paths, enhancing reasoning coherence and depth. Strategies like collaborative weighted summation and LLM-as-a-judge are used to evaluate and synthesize contributions from multiple reasoning paths to achieve an optimal decision.

Experimental Evaluation and Results

TSE's efficacy was validated through experiments on multiple reasoning tasks, including Game of 24, Mini Crosswords, and Creative Writing. Results showed noticeable improvements in reasoning performance when compared to existing methods such as standard CoT, CoT-SC, and Tree of Thoughts (ToT). Specifically, the success rate for complex reasoning tasks improved significantly, indicative of TSE's ability to uncover and exploit novel cognitive paths overlooked by traditional approaches.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this work are multifaceted. Practically, TSE enhances the robustness and effectiveness of LLMs in handling diverse reasoning tasks, potentially extending their applicability to more complex and dynamic problem-solving scenarios. Theoretically, it presents a novel perspective on the cognitive capabilities of AI, particularly in terms of expanding and optimizing internal thought processes. This framework paves the way for further research into sophisticated reasoning structures, potentially integrating external knowledge sources to further mitigate reasoning blind spots.

Future developments could explore the application of TSE across a broader range of LLM architectures and tasks, assessing its scalability and adaptability. Moreover, incorporating additional dimensions such as domain-specific knowledge or adaptive learning mechanisms could further amplify its effectiveness.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Thought Space Explorer represents a significant advancement in the pursuit of more intelligent and versatile AI reasoning. By addressing cognitive blind spots and fostering exploration beyond conventional thought paths, TSE substantially enriches the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. This framework not only broadens the scope of applications for LLMs but also contributes to the ongoing conversation about the limitations and potentialities of artificial cognitive structures.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets