Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
GPT-4o
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
o3 Pro
GPT-4.1 Pro
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
2000 character limit reached

On Model-Free Re-ranking for Visual Place Recognition with Deep Learned Local Features (2410.18573v2)

Published 24 Oct 2024 in cs.CV and cs.RO

Abstract: Re-ranking is the second stage of a visual place recognition task, in which the system chooses the best-matching images from a pre-selected subset of candidates. Model-free approaches compute the image pair similarity based on a spatial comparison of corresponding local visual features, eliminating the need for computationally expensive estimation of a model describing transformation between images. The article focuses on model-free re-ranking based on standard local visual features and their applicability in long-term autonomy systems. It introduces three new model-free re-ranking methods that were designed primarily for deep-learned local visual features. These features evince high robustness to various appearance changes, which stands as a crucial property for use with long-term autonomy systems. All the introduced methods were employed in a new visual place recognition system together with the D2-net feature detector (Dusmanu, 2019) and experimentally tested with diverse, challenging public datasets. The obtained results are on par with current state-of-the-art methods, affirming that model-free approaches are a viable and worthwhile path for long-term visual place recognition.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. C. Masone and B. Caputo, “A survey on deep visual place recognition,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 19 516–19 547, 2021.
  2. L. G. Camara, T. Pivoňka, M. Jílek, C. Gäbert, K. Košnar, and L. Přeučil, “Accurate and robust teach and repeat navigation by visual place recognition: A cnn approach,” in 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2020, pp. 6018–6024.
  3. X. Li, M. Larson, and A. Hanjalic, “Pairwise geometric matching for large-scale object retrieval,” in 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2015, pp. 5153–5161.
  4. S. Hausler, S. Garg, M. Xu, M. Milford, and T. Fischer, “Patch-netvlad: Multi-scale fusion of locally-global descriptors for place recognition,” in 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2021, pp. 14 136–14 147.
  5. Y. Zhang, Z. Jia, and T. Chen, “Image retrieval with geometry-preserving visual phrases,” in 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011, pp. 809–816.
  6. L. G. Camara and L. Přeučil, “Visual place recognition by spatial matching of high-level cnn features,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 133, p. 103625, 2020.
  7. M. Dusmanu, I. Rocco, T. Pajdla, M. Pollefeys, J. Sivic, A. Torii, and T. Sattler, “D2-net: A trainable cnn for joint description and detection of local features,” in 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019, pp. 8084–8093.
  8. G. Barbarani, M. Mostafa, H. Bayramov, G. Trivigno, G. Berton, C. Masone, and B. Caputo, “Are local features all you need for cross-domain visual place recognition?” in 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2023, pp. 6155–6165.
  9. A. Ali-Bey, B. Chaib-Draa, and P. Giguére, “Mixvpr: Feature mixing for visual place recognition,” in 2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2023, pp. 2997–3006.
  10. H. Jégou, M. Douze, C. Schmid, and P. Pérez, “Aggregating local descriptors into a compact image representation,” in 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2010, pp. 3304–3311.
  11. R. Arandjelovic, P. Gronat, A. Torii, T. Pajdla, and J. Sivic, “Netvlad: Cnn architecture for weakly supervised place recognition,” in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 5297–5307.
  12. N. V. Keetha, M. Milford, and S. Garg, “A hierarchical dual model of environment- and place-specific utility for visual place recognition,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 6969–6976, 2021.
  13. D. DeTone, T. Malisiewicz, and A. Rabinovich, “Superpoint: Self-supervised interest point detection and description,” in 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2018, pp. 337–33 712.
  14. P.-E. Sarlin, D. DeTone, T. Malisiewicz, and A. Rabinovich, “Superglue: Learning feature matching with graph neural networks,” in 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. 4937–4946.
  15. F. Radenović, G. Tolias, and O. Chum, “Fine-tuning cnn image retrieval with no human annotation,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1655–1668, 2019.
  16. G. Berton, C. Masone, and B. Caputo, “Rethinking visual geo-localization for large-scale applications,” in 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022, pp. 4868–4878.
  17. F. Lu, L. Zhang, X. Lan, S. Dong, Y. Wang, and C. Yuan, “Towards seamless adaptation of pre-trained models for visual place recognition,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
  18. D. G. Lowe, “Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 91–110, 2004.
  19. Y. Avrithis and G. Tolias, “Hough pyramid matching,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11263-013-0659-3
  20. X. Shen, Z. Lin, J. Brandt, S. Avidan, and Y. Wu, “Object retrieval and localization with spatially-constrained similarity measure and k-nn re-ranking,” in 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012, pp. 3013–3020.
  21. S. Garg, N. Suenderhauf, and M. Milford, “Lost? appearance-invariant place recognition for opposite viewpoints using visual semantics,” Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems XIV, 2018.
  22. Z. Li and N. Snavely, “Megadepth: Learning single-view depth prediction from internet photos,” in 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018, pp. 2041–2050.
  23. T. Sattler, W. Maddern, C. Toft, A. Torii, L. Hammarstrand, E. Stenborg, D. Safari, M. Okutomi, M. Pollefeys, J. Sivic, F. Kahl, and T. Pajdla, “Benchmarking 6dof outdoor visual localization in changing conditions,” in 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018, pp. 8601–8610.
  24. W. Maddern, G. Pascoe, C. Linegar, and P. Newman, “1 Year, 1000km: The Oxford RobotCar Dataset,” The International Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR), vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 2017.
  25. (2024) Mapillary. [Online]. Available: https://www.mapillary.com
  26. Z. Chen, F. Maffra, I. Sa, and M. Chli, “Only look once, mining distinctive landmarks from convnet for visual place recognition,” in 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2017, pp. 9–16.
  27. A. Glover, “Day and night, left and right,” Mar. 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4590133
  28. S. Skrede. (2013) Nordlandsbanen: minute by minute, season by season. [Online]. Available: https://nrkbeta.no/2013/01/15/nordlandsbanen-minute-by-minute-season-by-season
  29. P. Neubert, N. Sünderhauf, and P. Protzel, “Superpixel-based appearance change prediction for long-term navigation across seasons,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 69, pp. 15–27, 2015, selected papers from 6th European Conference on Mobile Robots.
  30. X. Zhao, X. Wu, W. Chen, P. C. Y. Chen, Q. Xu, and Z. Li, “Aliked: A lighter keypoint and descriptor extraction network via deformable transformation,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation & Measurement, vol. 72, pp. 1–16, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.03608.pdf
  31. A. Torii, J. Sivic, T. Pajdla, and M. Okutomi, “Visual place recognition with repetitive structures,” in 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2013, pp. 883–890.

Summary

  • The paper introduces three novel model-free re-ranking techniques that refine image candidate selections by computing spatial similarities from deep-learned local features.
  • The Histogram of Shifts method leverages 2D histograms with Gaussian weighting to manage geometric distortions and achieve superior recognition performance.
  • The proposed approaches reduce computational overhead by eliminating model estimations, making them ideal for real-time robotics and autonomous navigation applications.

Insights on Model-Free Re-ranking for Visual Place Recognition

The paper presents an exploration into model-free re-ranking methodologies specifically tailored for Visual Place Recognition (VPR), utilizing deep-learned local visual features. The paper introduces three novel model-free methods, aiming to enhance robustness in long-term autonomy systems—an area where resistance to varying environmental conditions is paramount.

Overview of the Research

The paper emphasizes the significance of the re-ranking process in VPR systems. Re-ranking serves as a second-stage refinement to identify the best-matching images from a set of candidates pre-selected during the initial filtering stage. The proposed model-free approaches avoid the need for computationally intensive model estimations, instead computing similarities based on the spatial correspondences of local features.

The paper evaluates these methods with a focus on their applicability to deep-learned local visual features, known for their robustness to appearance changes. D2-net, a state-of-the-art feature detector, was employed for experiments across several challenging datasets, including urban and seasonal variations.

Key Contributions and Experimental Results

The three introduced model-free methods include:

  1. Histogram of Shifts: This technique utilizes a 2D histogram to account for shifts in matched feature pairs, employing Gaussian weighting to enhance robustness against geometric distortions. This method demonstrated the highest performance among the proposed techniques.
  2. Anchor Points Method: An adaptation from SSM-VPR, this method unifies matches into a structured matrix, leveraging the spatial coherence among regularly detected features, and offers reduced computational complexity compared to traditional model-based approaches.
  3. Aggregated Score Method: This approach directly computes similarity scores from feature matches, optimizing for efficiency and robustness against outliers.

The experiments affirm the efficacy of these model-free methods, achieving performance comparable to state-of-the-art systems such as SSM-VPR and Patch-NetVLAD. Notably, the Histogram of Shifts method combined with MixVPR filtering yielded remarkable improvements in overall accuracy, especially in diverse environments represented by the Nordland dataset.

Implications and Future Directions

The proposed methods significantly contribute to the field of long-term visual place recognition, offering improvements in computational efficiency and robustness. By eliminating the need for model estimations, these methods mitigate computational overhead, making them suitable for real-time applications in robotics and autonomous vehicle navigation.

The research indicates potential for further exploration in the use of alternative deep-learned detectors, as suggested by suboptimal performance with the ALIKED detector in preliminary tests. Future work could focus on integrating these model-free approaches with more advanced filtering stages or extending their applicability to other domains, such as augmented reality or robot odometry systems.

Overall, this paper presents valuable insights and methodologies that enhance the landscape of visual place recognition, paving the way for more resilient and efficient systems capable of operating under challenging and varying real-world conditions.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.