Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On the Power of Randomization in Fair Classification and Representation (2406.03142v2)

Published 5 Jun 2024 in cs.LG

Abstract: Fair classification and fair representation learning are two important problems in supervised and unsupervised fair machine learning, respectively. Fair classification asks for a classifier that maximizes accuracy on a given data distribution subject to fairness constraints. Fair representation maps a given data distribution over the original feature space to a distribution over a new representation space such that all classifiers over the representation satisfy fairness. In this paper, we examine the power of randomization in both these problems to minimize the loss of accuracy that results when we impose fairness constraints. Previous work on fair classification has characterized the optimal fair classifiers on a given data distribution that maximize accuracy subject to fairness constraints, e.g., Demographic Parity (DP), Equal Opportunity (EO), and Predictive Equality (PE). We refine these characterizations to demonstrate when the optimal randomized fair classifiers can surpass their deterministic counterparts in accuracy. We also show how the optimal randomized fair classifier that we characterize can be obtained as a solution to a convex optimization problem. Recent work has provided techniques to construct fair representations for a given data distribution such that any classifier over this representation satisfies DP. However, the classifiers on these fair representations either come with no or weak accuracy guarantees when compared to the optimal fair classifier on the original data distribution. Extending our ideas for randomized fair classification, we improve on these works, and construct DP-fair, EO-fair, and PE-fair representations that have provably optimal accuracy and suffer no accuracy loss compared to the optimal DP-fair, EO-fair, and PE-fair classifiers respectively on the original data distribution.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Sushant Agarwal (5 papers)
  2. Amit Deshpande (35 papers)
Citations (4)

Summary

On the Power of Randomization in Fair Classification and Representation

The paper "On the Power of Randomization in Fair Classification and Representation" by Sushant Agarwal and Amit Deshpande addresses two critical problems in machine learning: fair classification and fair representation learning. These problems are central to ensuring that machine learning models operate ethically, avoiding the amplification of biases against sensitive demographic groups. The authors investigate the utility of randomization in minimizing the accuracy loss typically incurred when imposing fairness constraints and provide mathematical characterizations of optimal randomized fair classifiers and representations.

Problem Context and Motivation

The proliferation of machine learning models in sensitive domains such as healthcare, financial services, and law enforcement has heightened the importance of fairness in automated decision-making systems. Fair classification imposes constraints like Demographic Parity (DP), Equal Opportunity (EO), and Predictive Equality (PE) on classifiers to ensure equitable treatment across demographic groups. On the other hand, fair representation learning aims to map the original feature space to a new representation space, ensuring that all classifiers over this representation satisfy fairness constraints.

Main Contributions

The paper makes several notable contributions:

  1. Characterization of Optimal Randomized Fair Classifiers:
    • The authors demonstrate that randomized classifiers can outperform deterministic ones in accuracy while satisfying fairness constraints.
    • For each fairness constraint (DP, EO, PE), the paper characterizes the optimal randomized classifier as a mass-threshold classifier, which can be derived from a convex optimization problem.
  2. Convex Optimization Approaches:
    • The paper shows that the loss function for the optimal randomized fair classifier is convex, piecewise linear, and continuous, simplifying the search for the optimal classifier.
    • This characterization implies that finding the optimal classifier is computationally feasible through convex optimization techniques.
  3. Fair Representations with Zero Accuracy Loss:
    • Extending the results from fair classification, the authors construct fair representations that incur no accuracy loss compared to the optimal fair classifiers on the original data distribution.
    • These representations support the realistic scenario in which a data regulator releases fair data representations to potential users, ensuring compliance with fairness standards.

Detailed Results and Implications

Randomized Fair Classification

  • Demonstration of Superiority: By characterizing optimal randomized classifiers, the authors show that such classifiers can achieve higher accuracy than their deterministic counterparts. For example, in the DP setting, a randomized classifier is a mass-threshold classifier that can be obtained by solving a related convex optimization problem.
  • Convex Optimization Solution: For each fairness criterion, the paper translates the problem of finding the optimal randomized classifier into a convex optimization problem. The convex nature of the loss function ensures that standard optimization techniques can efficiently find the solution, making the approach practical.

Fair Representation Learning

  • Optimal Representations: The authors extend their analysis to construct fair representations for DP, EO, and PE. These representations ensure that the resulting classifiers suffer no accuracy loss compared to their counterparts on the original data, addressing a significant gap in previous works that failed to provide strong accuracy guarantees.
  • Fair Representation Implementation: The paper provides a constructive approach to map cells from the original data distribution to a new representation, ensuring that each cell adheres to the fairness constraints. This approach is demonstrated to be effective across different fairness criteria.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The research has significant implications:

  • Theoretical: The characterization of optimal randomized fair classifiers and representations advances the understanding of fairness in machine learning, providing a strong mathematical foundation for future work in this area.
  • Practical: The construction of fair representations with zero accuracy loss offers a viable strategy for data regulators and practitioners who need to ensure fairness without compromising accuracy. This is particularly relevant for regulated industries where fairness is legally mandated.

Future Directions

The paper also opens several avenues for future research:

  • Extending the results to multi-class classification and regression.
  • Investigating approximate or relaxed versions of the fairness constraints to achieve a balance between fairness and accuracy in practical applications.
  • Validating theoretical claims through experimental studies to further emphasize the practical benefits of the proposed approaches.

In conclusion, this paper provides a rigorous and practical framework for leveraging randomization to achieve optimal fairness in both classification and representation learning. The presented approaches and results are instrumental for researchers and practitioners striving to develop fair machine learning systems.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com