Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Graph Coarsening with Message-Passing Guarantees (2405.18127v1)

Published 28 May 2024 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: Graph coarsening aims to reduce the size of a large graph while preserving some of its key properties, which has been used in many applications to reduce computational load and memory footprint. For instance, in graph machine learning, training Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) on coarsened graphs leads to drastic savings in time and memory. However, GNNs rely on the Message-Passing (MP) paradigm, and classical spectral preservation guarantees for graph coarsening do not directly lead to theoretical guarantees when performing naive message-passing on the coarsened graph. In this work, we propose a new message-passing operation specific to coarsened graphs, which exhibit theoretical guarantees on the preservation of the propagated signal. Interestingly, and in a sharp departure from previous proposals, this operation on coarsened graphs is oriented, even when the original graph is undirected. We conduct node classification tasks on synthetic and real data and observe improved results compared to performing naive message-passing on the coarsened graph.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (43)
  1. Spectral sparsification and regret minimization beyond matrix multiplicative updates. In Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 237–245, 2015.
  2. E. Araya and Y. de Castro. Latent distance estimation for random geometric graphs. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 32, 2019. ISSN 10495258. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06841.
  3. G. Bravo Hermsdorff and L. Gunderson. A unifying framework for spectrum-preserving graph sparsification and coarsening. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
  4. Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gauges. arXiv:2104.13478, 2021. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.13478.
  5. Graph coarsening with neural networks. In 9th International conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  6. Graph coarsening: from scientific computing to machine learning, volume 79. Springer International Publishing, 2022. ISBN 4032402100282. doi: 10.1007/s40324-021-00282-x. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s40324-021-00282-x.
  7. A gromov-wasserstein geometric view of spectrum-preserving graph coarsening. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 5257–5281. PMLR, 2023.
  8. Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016.
  9. Weighted graph cuts without eigenvectors a multilevel approach. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 29(11):1944–1957, 2007.
  10. Graph coarsening via convolution matching for scalable graph neural network training. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024, pages 1502–1510, 2024.
  11. F. Dorfler and F. Bullo. Kron reduction of graphs with applications to electrical networks. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 60(1):150–163, 2012.
  12. Massive social network analysis: Mining twitter for social good. Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing, pages 583–593, 2010. ISSN 01903918. doi: 10.1109/ICPP.2010.66.
  13. Influence-based mini-batching for graph neural networks. 12 2022. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09083.
  14. Citeseer: An automatic citation indexing system, 1998. URL www.neci.nj.nec.com.
  15. Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 1–14, 2017. ISBN 978-1-4577-0079-8. doi: 10.1002/nme.2457. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.01212.
  16. P. Hu and W. C. Lau. A Survey and Taxonomy of Graph Sampling. pages 1–34, 2013. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.5865.
  17. Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphs. Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), (NeurIPS):1–34, 2020. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.00687.
  18. Scaling up Graph Neural Networks Via Graph Coarsening, volume 1. Association for Computing Machinery, 2021. ISBN 9781450383325. doi: 10.1145/3447548.3467256.
  19. Graph condensation for graph neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  20. Condensing graphs via one-step gradient matching. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 720–730, 2022.
  21. Graph coarsening with preserved spectral properties. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 4452–4462. PMLR, 2020.
  22. G. Karypis and V. Kumar. A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM Journal on scientific Computing, 20(1):359–392, 1998.
  23. N. Keriven. Not too little, not too much: a theoretical analysis of graph (over)smoothing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.12156.
  24. T. N. Kipf and M. Welling. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2016.
  25. Predict then propagate: Graph neural networks meet personalized PageRank. 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, pages 1–15, 2019.
  26. Featured graph coarsening with similarity guarantees. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 17953–17975. PMLR, 2023.
  27. Self-attention graph pooling. In International conference on machine learning, pages 3734–3743. PMLR, 2019.
  28. Y. T. Lee and H. Sun. Constructing linear-sized spectral sparsification in almost-linear time. SIAM Journal on Computing, 47(6):2315–2336, 2018.
  29. A. Loukas. Graph reduction with spectral and cut guarantees. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 20(116):1–42, 2019.
  30. A. Loukas and P. Vandergheynst. Spectrally approximating large graphs with smaller graphs. In International conference on machine learning, pages 3237–3246. PMLR, 2018.
  31. T. Ma and J. Chen. Unsupervised learning of graph hierarchical abstractions with differentiable coarsening and optimal transport. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 35, pages 8856–8864, 2021.
  32. Automating the construction of internet portals with machine learning, 2000. URL www.campsearch.com.
  33. J. W. Ruge and K. Stüben. Algebraic multigrid. In Multigrid methods, pages 73–130. SIAM, 1987.
  34. The graph neural network model. IEEE transactions on neural networks, 20(1):61–80, 2008.
  35. Spectral sparsification of graphs. SIAM Journal on Computing, 40(4):981–1025, 2011.
  36. Graph clustering with graph neural networks. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(127):1–21, 2023.
  37. Billion-scale commodity embedding for E-commerce recommendation in alibaba. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 839–848, 2018a. doi: 10.1145/3219819.3219869.
  38. Dataset distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.10959, 2018b.
  39. Simplifying graph convolutional networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 6861–6871. PMLR, 2019.
  40. Revisiting semi-supervised learning with graph embeddings. In International conference on machine learning, pages 40–48. PMLR, 2016.
  41. Z. Ying. Jiaxuan you, christopher morris, xiang ren, will hamilton, and jure leskovec. hierarchical graph representation learning with differentiable pooling. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31:4800–4810, 2018.
  42. Structure-free graph condensation: From large-scale graphs to condensed graph-free data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  43. Graph Neural Networks with Heterophily. 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021, 12B:11168–11176, 2021.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel message-passing coarsening method that approximates original graph propagation using an oriented paradigm.
  • It demonstrates enhanced node classification and spectral preservation by maintaining low RSA error bounds on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
  • The study offers practical techniques for scalable GNN training while motivating future research into advanced coarsening algorithms.

Overview of "Graph Coarsening with Message-Passing Guarantees"

This paper introduces a novel approach to graph coarsening with a specific focus on ensuring message-passing guarantees, which are pivotal for the efficient training and inference of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). Graph coarsening refers to the process of reducing a graph's size while preserving its essential structural properties. This reduction aims to alleviate computational and memory limitations, especially relevant for large-scale graphs encountered in modern-day data science and machine learning applications.

Key Contributions

The authors propose a novel message-passing operation tailored for coarsened graphs, proposing a propagation matrix denoted as $S^$, defined as S=QSQ+S^ = Q S Q^+, where QQ denotes the coarsening matrix and SS denotes the original propagation matrix on the complete graph. This proposal diverges from traditional symmetric propagation matrices, introducing an oriented message-passing paradigm that accommodates undirected graphs. The primary advantage of this approach lies in its ability to approximate the message-passing process on the original graph using the coarsened graph representation, promising computational efficiency without compromising on the model's performance.

Numerical Results and Claims

The paper provides empirical evidence of the advantages of the proposed method by conducting node classification experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets. These experiments reveal that the newly defined $S^$ significantly improves classification performance over naive message-passing strategies on coarsened graphs. Theoretical analysis supports these results, establishing a link between spectral preservation, measured by the Restricted Spectral Approximation (RSA) constant, and message-passing guarantees.

The adoption of the proposed message-passing operation translates spectral preservation properties of graph Laplacians into message-passing guarantees for GNN training. The analysis hinges on maintaining low RSA errors, thereby extending spectral approximation guarantees to message-passing guarantees. Further, the bounds on training loss underscore the practical utility of the proposed operation by ensuring that the risk associated with training on the coarsened graph remains close to that of the original graph.

Implications and Future Directions

From a practical standpoint, this work proffers substantial improvements in the training efficiency of GNNs. By adopting the proposed coarsening technique, practitioners can handle larger graphs that would otherwise be computationally prohibitive, thereby facilitating more scalable machine learning applications. Furthermore, the paper lays the groundwork for a novel class of coarsening algorithms that prioritize message-passing fidelity, potentially inspiring future research to develop scalable algorithms that satisfy the requisite spectral guarantees.

Theoretically, the results pose intriguing questions regarding the broader applicability of oriented message-passing operations in other graph-based learning tasks. A promising area for future exploration would be the extension of these techniques to non-linear GNN architectures, for which the current analysis chiefly applies to linear models like the Simplified Graph Convolution (SGC). Additionally, investigating more sophisticated coarsening methods and other graph transformations that preserve high-frequency signals could further enhance the model's flexibility and performance.

Overall, this paper provides a rigorous examination of the interaction between graph coarsening and message-passing, offering a robust framework for researchers seeking to optimize GNN operations on coarsened graphs. Its implications stretch across both theoretical insights and practical methodologies, contributing to the enhanced efficiency of graph-based learning models.