Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
175 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

NASPrecision: Neural Architecture Search-Driven Multi-Stage Learning for Surface Roughness Prediction in Ultra-Precision Machining (2405.17757v1)

Published 28 May 2024 in cs.CE

Abstract: Accurate surface roughness prediction is critical for ensuring high product quality, especially in areas like manufacturing and aerospace, where the smallest imperfections can compromise performance or safety. However, this is challenging due to complex, non-linear interactions among variables, which is further exacerbated with limited and imbalanced datasets. Existing methods using traditional machine learning algorithms require extensive domain knowledge for feature engineering and substantial human intervention for model selection. To address these issues, we propose NASPrecision, a Neural Architecture Search (NAS)-Driven Multi-Stage Learning Framework. This innovative approach autonomously identifies the most suitable features and models for various surface roughness prediction tasks and significantly enhances the performance by multi-stage learning. Our framework operates in three stages: 1) architecture search stage, employing NAS to automatically identify the most effective model architecture; 2) initial training stage, where we train the neural network for initial predictions; 3) refinement stage, where a subsequent model is appended to refine and capture subtle variations overlooked by the initial training stage. In light of limited and imbalanced datasets, we adopt a generative data augmentation technique to balance and generate new data by learning the underlying data distribution. We conducted experiments on three distinct real-world datasets linked to different machining techniques. Results show improvements in Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Standard Deviation (STD) by 18%, 31%, and 22%, respectively. This establishes it as a robust and general solution for precise surface roughness prediction, potentially boosting production efficiency and product quality in key industries while minimizing domain expertise and human intervention.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. Designing neural network architectures using reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.02167.
  2. Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review. International journal of machine tools and manufacture, 43(8):833–844.
  3. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45:5–32.
  4. Review on diamond-machining processes for the generation of functional surface structures. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 5(1):1–7.
  5. Support vector machines models for surface roughness prediction in cnc turning of aisi 304 austenitic stainless steel. Journal of intelligent Manufacturing, 23(3).
  6. Searching for efficient multi-scale architectures for dense image prediction. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31.
  7. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 785–794.
  8. Support-vector networks. Machine learning, 20:273–297.
  9. Csáji, B. C. et al. (2001). Approximation with artificial neural networks. Faculty of Sciences, Etvs Lornd University, Hungary, 24(48):7.
  10. Support vector regression machines. Advances in neural information processing systems, 9.
  11. Neural architecture search: A survey. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 20(1):1997–2017.
  12. Fix, E. (1985). Discriminatory analysis: nonparametric discrimination, consistency properties, volume 1. USAF school of Aviation Medicine.
  13. Generative adversarial networks. Communications of the ACM, 63(11):139–144.
  14. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851.
  15. Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12(1):55–67.
  16. Holland, J. H. (1992). Genetic algorithms. Scientific american, 267(1):66–73.
  17. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural networks, 2(5):359–366.
  18. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
  19. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114.
  20. Bayesian linear regression for surface roughness prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 142:106770.
  21. On-machine surface measurement and applications for ultra-precision machining: a state-of-the-art review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 104:831–847.
  22. Design and fabrication of a freeform microlens array for a compact large-field-of-view compound-eye camera. Applied optics, 51(12):1843–1852.
  23. Prediction of surface roughness in extrusion-based additive manufacturing with machine learning. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 57:488–495.
  24. Darts: Differentiable architecture search. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.09055.
  25. Aging evolution for image classifier architecture search. In AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 2, page 2.
  26. In-process surface roughness prediction system using cutting vibrations in turning. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 43:40–51.
  27. Practical bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. Advances in neural information processing systems, 25.
  28. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In International conference on machine learning, pages 2256–2265. PMLR.
  29. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456.
  30. Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 58(1):267–288.
  31. Ensemble learning with a genetic algorithm for surface roughness prediction in multi-jet polishing. Expert Systems with Applications, 207:118024.
  32. Gaussian processes for regression. Advances in neural information processing systems, 8.
  33. Predictive modelling of surface roughness in fused deposition modelling using data fusion. International Journal of Production Research, 57(12):3992–4006.
  34. Determining the influence of cutting fluids on tool wear and surface roughness during turning of aisi 304 austenitic stainless steel. Journal of materials processing technology, 209(2):900–909.
  35. Optimized tool path generation for fast tool servo diamond turning of micro-structured surfaces. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 63:1137–1152.
  36. An effective ls-svm-based approach for surface roughness prediction in machined surfaces. Neurocomputing, 198:35–39.
  37. A review of surface roughness generation in ultra-precision machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 91:76–95.
  38. Neural architecture search with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01578.
  39. Learning transferable architectures for scalable image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8697–8710.
  40. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the royal statistical society: series B (statistical methodology), 67(2):301–320.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com