Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
8 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Channel Balance Interpolation in the Lightning Network via Machine Learning (2405.12087v1)

Published 20 May 2024 in cs.LG

Abstract: The Bitcoin Lightning Network is a Layer 2 payment protocol that addresses Bitcoin's scalability by facilitating quick and cost effective transactions through payment channels. This research explores the feasibility of using machine learning models to interpolate channel balances within the network, which can be used for optimizing the network's pathfinding algorithms. While there has been much exploration in balance probing and multipath payment protocols, predicting channel balances using solely node and channel features remains an uncharted area. This paper evaluates the performance of several machine learning models against two heuristic baselines and investigates the predictive capabilities of various features. Our model performs favorably in experimental evaluation, outperforming by 10% against an equal split baseline where both edges are assigned half of the channel capacity.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. R. Pickhardt, S. Tikhomirov, A. Biryukov, and M. Nowostawski, “Security and privacy of lightning network payments with uncertain channel balances,” 2021.
  2. D. Valko and D. Kudenko, “Increasing energy efficiency of bitcoin infrastructure with reinforcement learning and one-shot path planning for the lightning network,” in Proc. of the Adaptive and Learning Agents Workshop (ALA 2023) At AAMAS 2023, May 29-30, Cruz, Hayes, Wang, Yates (eds.) London, UK, 2023.
  3. R. Pickhardt and S. Richter, “Optimally reliable & cheap payment flows on the lightning network,” 2021.
  4. S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system,” 2008.
  5. C. Li, P. Li, W. Xu, F. Long, and A. C. Yao, “Scaling nakamoto consensus to thousands of transactions per second,” CoRR, vol. abs/1805.03870, 2018.
  6. J. Poon and T. Dryja, “The bitcoin lightning network: Scalable off-chain instant payments,” 2016.
  7. I. A. Seres, L. Gulyás, D. A. Nagy, and P. Burcsi, “Topological analysis of bitcoin’s lightning network,” in Mathematical Research for Blockchain Economy: 1st International Conference MARBLE 2019, Santorini, Greece, pp. 1–12, Springer, 2020.
  8. “River Financial 2.” https://amboss.space/node/03037dc08e9ac63b82581f79b662a4d0ceca8a8ca162b1af3551595b8f2d97b70a. Accessed: 2024-03-26.
  9. “River Financial 1.” https://amboss.space/node/03aab7e9327716ee946b8fbfae039b0db85356549e72c5cca113ea67893d0821e5. Accessed: 2024-03-26.
  10. River Financial, “The lightning network grew by 1212% in 2 years: Why it’s time to pay attention,” Oct 2023.
  11. P. Zabka, K.-T. Foerster, S. Schmid, and C. Decker, “Empirical evaluation of nodes and channels of the lightning network,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 83, p. 101584, 2022.
  12. “lightningnetworkdaemon/lnd.” https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd. Accessed: 2024-03-26.
  13. “The power of valves for better flow control, improved reliability & lower expected payment failure rates on the lightning network.” https://blog.bitmex.com/the-power-of-htlc_maximum_msat-as-a-control-valve-for-better-flow-control-improved-reliability-and-lower-expected-payment-failure-rates-on-the-lightning-network/. Accessed: 2024-05-16.
  14. V. P. Dwivedi, C. K. Joshi, T. Laurent, Y. Bengio, and X. Bresson, “Benchmarking graph neural networks,” CoRR, vol. abs/2003.00982, 2020.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that a joint ML model, combining node, edge, and positional features, significantly improves channel balance prediction with an MAE of 0.259 and R² of 0.365.
  • The study compares baseline methods with advanced techniques, showing that concatenated and shallow graph models outperform traditional heuristics.
  • The findings suggest that integrating ML predictions can reduce invasive probing and enhance routing efficiency in the Lightning Network.

Channel Balance Interpolation in the Lightning Network via Machine Learning

The Lightning Network has been a pivotal addition to the Bitcoin ecosystem, enabling rapid and affordable transactions. While it's revolutionized scalability, the network's efficiency hinges on the accurate prediction of channel balances for effective pathfinding. This paper dives into the feasibility of using ML to predict these channel balances and optimize routing.

Background: Bitcoin and the Lightning Network

Before diving into the research, it's essential to understand the underlying technologies. Bitcoin, established in 2008, is a peer-to-peer decentralized digital currency operating on a Proof-of-Work consensus model. Although secure and decentralized, Bitcoin's transaction throughput is limited, making microtransactions expensive and slow.

The Lightning Network, introduced to address these scalability issues, is a Layer 2 protocol on top of Bitcoin. It utilizes payment channels to facilitate off-chain transactions, enhancing speed and reducing costs. While effective, its pathfinding process—selecting a viable route for a transaction—is often hit-or-miss and can be tedious due to unknown channel balances.

Motivating the Study

The need for efficient pathfinding in the Lightning Network is paramount. Current methods often rely on either probing techniques, which can be invasive and resource-intensive, or heuristic-based approaches, which lack accuracy. By applying ML models for balance interpolation, there could be a substantial improvement in pathfinding efficacy.

Methodology

The core of this research lies in predicting channel balances based on node and edge features, combined with topological information of the network. Here's a breakdown of the process:

Data Collection and Features

The data includes publicly available Lightning Network information and crowdsourced balance data, focusing on channel capacities and balance.

Key features for the prediction model include:

  • Node Features: Capacity centrality, fee ratio, and feature flags indicating node capabilities.
  • Edge Features: Time lock delta, minimum/maximum HTLC values, and fee structures.

Machine Learning Models

The paper evaluates various ML models, notably Random Forests, due to their simplicity and efficacy. Here's a brief overview of the models tested:

  1. Equal Split Baseline: Assumes an equal split of channel capacity.
  2. Local Max HTLC Baseline: Uses the maximum HTLC amount from the local channel policy.
  3. Edge-Wise Random Features: Uses random features from an isotropic Normal distribution.
  4. Node-Wise Prediction: Depends solely on node features.
  5. Edge-Wise Prediction: Relies on edge features.
  6. Concatenated Prediction: Uses a combination of node and edge features.
  7. Shallow Graph Prediction: Incorporates positional encodings derived from the graph Laplacian matrix.
  8. Joint Model: Merges node, edge, and positional encodings for prediction.

Results

The performance of these models is evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and the correlation coefficient (R). The findings reveal:

  • Equal Split and Local Max HTLC models showed minimal predictive power.
  • More sophisticated models like Concatenated and Shallow Graph demonstrated moderate improvements.
  • The Joint Model, combining all features, outperformed with an MAE_p of 0.259 and an of 0.365.

The research highlights the value of integrating both economic and network attributes into the ML models, with positional encodings significantly enhancing predictive accuracy.

Implications and Future Work

The implications are substantial:

  • Enhanced Pathfinding: Utilizing predictive models for balance interpolation can prioritize paths more effectively, reducing trial-and-error and saving time.
  • Privacy-Friendly: Reduces the need for probing, thus protecting user privacy.

Looking ahead, future work can refine these models by incorporating more dynamic data, such as transaction frequencies or network congestion levels. There's also potential in extending this approach to simulate and quantify pathfinding efficiency gains.

Moreover, integrating these models directly into Lightning Nodes for real-time path optimization could revolutionize routing, making the network more reliable and user-friendly.

Conclusion

This paper marks a step towards intelligent and efficient routing in the Lightning Network through machine learning. While there's room for further enhancements, the foundation laid here suggests a promising future for scalable, cost-effective Bitcoin transactions. By bridging the gap between current heuristic methods and advanced ML approaches, the Lightning Network could become more robust and efficient for everyday use.