Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Preservation theorems on sparse classes revisited (2405.10887v2)

Published 17 May 2024 in cs.LO and math.LO

Abstract: We revisit the work studying homomorphism preservation for first-order logic in sparse classes of structures initiated in [Atserias et al., JACM 2006] and [Dawar, JCSS 2010]. These established that first-order logic has the homomorphism preservation property in any sparse class that is monotone and addable. It turns out that the assumption of addability is not strong enough for the proofs given. We demonstrate this by constructing classes of graphs of bounded treewidth which are monotone and addable but fail to have homomorphism preservation. We also show that homomorphism preservation fails on the class of planar graphs. On the other hand, the proofs of homomorphism preservation can be recovered by replacing addability by a stronger condition of amalgamation over bottlenecks. This is analogous to a similar condition formulated for extension preservation in [Atserias et al., SiCOMP 2008].

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. Datalog vs first-order logic. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 49(3):562–588, 1994. 30th IEEE Conference on Foundations of Computer Science.
  2. Preservation under extensions on well-behaved finite structures. SIAM Journal on Computing, 38(4):1364–1381, 2008.
  3. On preservation under homomorphisms and unions of conjunctive queries. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 53(2):208–237, 2006.
  4. Planar Permutation Graphs. Annales de l’institut Henri Poincaré. Section B. Calcul des probabilités et statistiques, 3(4):433–438, 1967.
  5. Peter Damaschke. Induced subgraphs and well-quasi-ordering. Journal of Graph Theory, 14(4):427–435, 1990.
  6. Anuj Dawar. Finite model theory on tame classes of structures. In International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, pages 2–12. Springer, 2007.
  7. Anuj Dawar. Homomorphism preservation on quasi-wide classes. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 76(5):324–332, 2010.
  8. First-order model checking on monadically stable graph classes, 2023.
  9. Flip-breakability: A combinatorial dichotomy for monadically dependent graph classes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15201, 2024.
  10. H-D. Ebbinghaus and J. Flum. Finite Model Theory. Springer, 2nd edition, 1999.
  11. Shrub-depth: Capturing height of dense graphs. Logical Methods in Computer Science, 15, 2019.
  12. Yuri Gurevich. Toward logic tailored for computational complexity. Computation and Proof Theory, pages 175–216, 1984.
  13. Sparsity: graphs, structures, and algorithms, volume 28. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  14. Benjamin Rossman. Homomorphism preservation theorems. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 55(3):1–53, 2008.
  15. W. W. Tait. A counterexample to a conjecture of Scott and Suppes. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 24(1):15–16, 1959.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.