Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Stable Phase Retrieval with Mirror Descent (2405.10754v2)

Published 17 May 2024 in math.OC, cs.CV, cs.IT, and math.IT

Abstract: In this paper, we aim to reconstruct an n-dimensional real vector from m phaseless measurements corrupted by an additive noise. We extend the noiseless framework developed in [15], based on mirror descent (or Bregman gradient descent), to deal with noisy measurements and prove that the procedure is stable to (small enough) additive noise. In the deterministic case, we show that mirror descent converges to a critical point of the phase retrieval problem, and if the algorithm is well initialized and the noise is small enough, the critical point is near the true vector up to a global sign change. When the measurements are i.i.d Gaussian and the signal-to-noise ratio is large enough, we provide global convergence guarantees that ensure that with high probability, mirror descent converges to a global minimizer near the true vector (up to a global sign change), as soon as the number of measurements m is large enough. The sample complexity bound can be improved if a spectral method is used to provide a good initial guess. We complement our theoretical study with several numerical results showing that mirror descent is both a computationally and statistically efficient scheme to solve the phase retrieval problem.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. Instantaneous one-angle white-light scatterometer. Opt. Express, OE, 26(1):204–219, January 2018.
  2. On linear convergence of non-euclidean gradient methods without strong convexity and Lipschitz gradient continuity. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 182(3):1068–1087, 2019.
  3. A descent lemma beyond Lipschitz gradient continuity: First-order methods revisited and applications. Mathematics of Operations Research, page 20, 2016.
  4. Distributed algorithms via gradient descent for fisher markets. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pages 127–136, 2011.
  5. First order methods beyond convexity and Lipschitz gradient continuity with applications to quadratic inverse problems. SIAM J. Optim., 28(3):2131–2151, 2018.
  6. E. Candès and X. Li. Solving quadratic equations via phaselift when there are about as many equations as unknowns. Found. Comput. Math., 2014.
  7. Phase retrieval via Wirtinger flow: Theory and algorithms. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 61(4):1985–2007, 2015.
  8. PhaseLift: Exact and stable signal recovery from magnitude measurements via convex programming. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 66(8):1241–1274, 2013.
  9. Y. Chen and E. Candès. Solving random quadratic systems of equations is nearly as easy as solving linear systems. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 70(5):822–883, May 2017.
  10. C. Davis and W. M. Kahan. The rotation of eigenvectors by a perturbation. iii. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 7:1–4, 1970.
  11. The nonsmooth landscape of phase retrieval. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 40(4):2652–2695, October 2020.
  12. L. Demanet and P. Hand. Stable Optimizationless Recovery from Phaseless Linear Measurements. MIT web domain, November 2013.
  13. A. Fannjiang and T. Strohmer. The numerics of phase retrieval. Acta Numerica, 29:125–228, May 2020.
  14. Stable Signal Recovery from Phaseless Measurements. J Fourier Anal Appl, 22(4):787–808, August 2016.
  15. Provable phase retrieval with mirror descent. SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 16(3):1106–1141, September 2023.
  16. Phase retrieval: An overview of recent developments. In A. Stern, editor, Optical Compressive Imaging. CRC Press, 2016.
  17. F. Krahmer and D. Stöger. Complex Phase Retrieval from Subgaussian Measurements. J. Fourier Anal Appl, 26(6):89, November 2020.
  18. Relatively smooth convex optimization by first-order methods, and applications. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 28(1):333–354, 2018.
  19. D. R. Luke. Phase Retrieval, What’s New? SIAG/OPT Views and News, 25(1):1–6, 2017.
  20. Huang M. and Xu Z. Performance bound of the intensity-based model for noisy phase retrieval, 2021.
  21. Phase retrieval using alternating minimization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 63(18):4814–4826, 2015.
  22. R. T. Rockafellar. Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, 1970.
  23. H. Sahinoglou and S. Cabrera. On phase retrieval of finite-length sequences using the initial time sample. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 38(5):954–958, 1991.
  24. Phase retrieval with application to optical imaging: A contemporary overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 32(3):87–109, May 2015.
  25. A stochastic Bregman primal-dual splitting algorithm for composite optimization. Pure and Applied Functional Analysis (special issue in honor of L. Bregman), 2022.
  26. A geometric analysis of phase retrieval. Found Comput Math, 18(5):1131–1198, October 2018.
  27. M. Teboulle. A simplified view of first order methods for optimization. Mathematical Programming, 170(1):67–96, 2018.
  28. N. Vaswani. Non-convex structured phase retrieval. arXiv:2006.13298 [cs, eess, math, stat], June 2020.
  29. I. Waldspurger. Phase retrieval with random gaussian sensing vectors by alternating projections. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 64(5):3301–3312, May 2018.
  30. Solving systems of random quadratic equations via truncated amplitude flow. arXiv:1605.08285 [cs, math, stat], August 2017.
  31. Y. Xia and Z. Xu. The performance of the amplitude-based model for complex phase retrieval. Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA, 13(1), 01 2024.
  32. A nonconvex approach for phase retrieval: Reshaped Wirtinger flow and incremental algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 18(141):1–35, 2017.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.