Enhancing Airline Customer Satisfaction: A Machine Learning and Causal Analysis Approach (2405.09076v1)
Abstract: This study explores the enhancement of customer satisfaction in the airline industry, a critical factor for retaining customers and building brand reputation, which are vital for revenue growth. Utilizing a combination of machine learning and causal inference methods, we examine the specific impact of service improvements on customer satisfaction, with a focus on the online boarding pass experience. Through detailed data analysis involving several predictive and causal models, we demonstrate that improvements in the digital aspects of customer service significantly elevate overall customer satisfaction. This paper highlights how airlines can strategically leverage these insights to make data-driven decisions that enhance customer experiences and, consequently, their market competitiveness.
- B. Atems and J. Yimga, “Quantifying the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on US airline stock prices,” Journal of Air Transport Management, vol. 97, p. 102141, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102141.
- Harvard Business Review, “Putting the service-profit chain to work,” Harvard Business Review, July 2008. [Online]. Available: https://hbr.org/2008/07/putting-the-service-profit-chain-to-work
- T. J. Mahal, “Airline Passenger Satisfaction,” Kaggle, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/teejmahal20/airline-passenger-satisfaction
- D. B. Rubin, “Causal Inference Using Potential Outcomes: Design, Modeling, Decisions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 100, no. 469, pp. 322-331, 2005.
- P. R. Rosenbaum and D. B. Rubin, “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” Biometrika, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 41-55, 1983.
- L. Breiman, “Random Forests,” Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5-32, 2001.
- K. Hirano and G. W. Imbens, “Estimation of Causal Effects Using Propensity Score Weighting: An Application to Data on Right Heart Catheterization,” Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, vol. 2, no. 3-4, pp. 259-278, 2001.
- P. C. Austin and E. A. Stuart, “Moving Towards Best Practice When Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) Using the Propensity Score to Estimate Causal Treatment Effects in Observational Studies,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 34, no. 28, pp. 3661-3679, 2015.
- D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson, “A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement from a Finite Universe,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 47, no. 260, pp. 663-685, 1952.
- G. W. Imbens and J. M. Wooldridge, “Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 5-86, 2009.
- S. M. Lundberg and S. I. Lee, “A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions,” in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’17), 2017, pp. 4765–4774.
- P. C. Austin, “An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 399-424, 2011.
- T. Fawcett, “An Introduction to ROC Analysis,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 861-874, 2006.
- D. E. Ho, K. Imai, G. King, and E. A. Stuart, “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference,” Political Analysis, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 199-236, 2007.