Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
120 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

An adaptive enrichment design using Bayesian model averaging for selection and threshold-identification of tailoring variables (2405.08180v1)

Published 13 May 2024 in stat.ME

Abstract: Precision medicine stands as a transformative approach in healthcare, offering tailored treatments that can enhance patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. As understanding of complex disease improves, clinical trials are being designed to detect subgroups of patients with enhanced treatment effects. Biomarker-driven adaptive enrichment designs, which enroll a general population initially and later restrict accrual to treatment-sensitive patients, are gaining popularity. Current practice often assumes either pre-trial knowledge of biomarkers defining treatment-sensitive subpopulations or a simple, linear relationship between continuous markers and treatment effectiveness. Motivated by a trial studying rheumatoid arthritis treatment, we propose a Bayesian adaptive enrichment design which identifies important tailoring variables out of a larger set of candidate biomarkers. Our proposed design is equipped with a flexible modelling framework where the effects of continuous biomarkers are introduced using free knot B-splines. The parameters of interest are then estimated by marginalizing over the space of all possible variable combinations using Bayesian model averaging. At interim analyses, we assess whether a biomarker-defined subgroup has enhanced or reduced treatment effects, allowing for early termination due to efficacy or futility and restricting future enroLLMent to treatment-sensitive patients. We consider pre-categorized and continuous biomarkers, the latter of which may have complex, nonlinear relationships to the outcome and treatment effect. Using simulations, we derive the operating characteristics of our design and compare its performance to two existing approaches.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Estimating the cost of new drug development: is it really $802 million? Health Affairs 25, 420–428.
  2. A Bayesian basket trial design accounting for uncertainties of homogeneity and heterogeneity of treatment effect among subpopulations. Pharmaceutical Statistics 19, 975–1000.
  3. Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology. Statistics in Medicine 28, 1445–1463.
  4. Subgroup-specific dose finding in phase I clinical trials based on time to toxicity allowing adaptive subgroup combination. Pharmaceutical Statistics 17, 734–749.
  5. Bayesian cluster hierarchical model for subgroup borrowing in the design and analysis of basket trials with binary endpoints. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 29, 2717–2732.
  6. A bayesian lasso via reversible-jump mcmc. Signal Processing 91, 1920–1932.
  7. Reversible jump PDMP samplers for variable selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association 118, 2915–2927.
  8. A Bayesian basket trial design using a calibrated Bayesian hierarchical model. Clinical Trials 15, 149–158.
  9. The cross-validated adaptive signature design. Clinical Cancer Research 16, 691–698.
  10. Adaptive signature design: an adaptive clinical trial design for generating and prospectively testing a gene expression signature for sensitive patients. Clinical Cancer Research 11, 7872–7878.
  11. Gamerman, D. (1997). Sampling from the posterior distribution in generalized linear mixed models. Statistics and Computing 7, 57–68.
  12. Bayesian two-stage biomarker-based adaptive design for targeted therapy development. Statistics in Biosciences 8, 99–128.
  13. An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints. Pharmaceutical Statistics 10, 347–356.
  14. Biomarker-adaptive threshold design: a procedure for evaluating treatment with possible biomarker-defined subset effect. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 99, 1036–1043.
  15. Bayesian methods for the analysis of early-phase oncology basket trials with information borrowing across cancer types. Statistics in Medicine 39, 3459–3475.
  16. A two-stage Bayesian design for co-development of new drugs and companion diagnostics. Statistics in Medicine 31, 901–914.
  17. Bayesian adaptive trial design for a continuous biomarker with possibly nonlinear or nonmonotone prognostic or predictive effects. Biometrics 78, 1441–1453.
  18. Group sequential enrichment design incorporating subgroup selection. Statistics in Medicine 32, 2695–2714.
  19. Biomarker driven population enrichment for adaptive oncology trials with time to event endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 33, 4515–4531.
  20. A Bayesian natural cubic B-spline varying coefficient method for non-ignorable dropout. BMC Medical Research Methodology 20, 1–14.
  21. Bayesian adaptive patient enrollment restriction to identify a sensitive subpopulation using a continuous biomarker in a randomized phase 2 trial. Pharmaceutical Statistics 15, 420–429.
  22. An overview of precision oncology basket and umbrella trials for clinicians. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 70, 125–137.
  23. Bayesian group sequential enrichment designs based on adaptive regression of response and survival time on baseline biomarkers. Biometrics 78, 60–71.
  24. Bayesian adaptive basket trial design using model averaging. Biostatistics 22, 19–34.
  25. Adaptive randomized phase II design for biomarker threshold selection and independent evaluation. Chinese Clinical Oncology 3, 3489.
  26. Robins, J. M. (1997). Causal inference from complex longitudinal data. In Latent variable modeling and applications to causality, pages 69–117. Springer.
  27. Group sequential designs with prospectively planned rules for subpopulation enrichment. Statistics in Medicine 35, 3776–3791.
  28. Simon, R. (2017). Critical review of umbrella, basket, and platform designs for oncology clinical trials. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 102, 934–941.
  29. Rheumatoid arthritis. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 4, 18001.
  30. Approaches to evaluation of treatment effect in randomized clinical trials with genomic subset. Pharmaceutical Statistics: The Journal of Applied Statistics in the Pharmaceutical Industry 6, 227–244.
  31. Prediction of response to anti-tnf treatment using laboratory biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. RMD open 8, e002570.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com