Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Is it getting harder to make a hit? Evidence from 65 years of US music chart history (2405.07574v1)

Published 13 May 2024 in physics.soc-ph and cs.SI

Abstract: Since the creation of the Billboard Hot 100 music chart in 1958, the chart has been a window into the music consumption of Americans. Which songs succeed on the chart is decided by consumption volumes, which can be affected by consumer music taste, and other factors such as advertisement budgets, airplay time, the specifics of ranking algorithms, and more. Since its introduction, the chart has documented music consumerism through eras of globalization, economic growth, and the emergence of new technologies for music listening. In recent years, musicians and other hitmakers have voiced their worry that the music world is changing: Many claim that it is getting harder to make a hit but until now, the claims have not been backed using chart data. Here we show that the dynamics of the Billboard Hot 100 chart have changed significantly since the chart's founding in 1958, and in particular in the past 15 years. Whereas most songs spend less time on the chart now than songs did in the past, we show that top-1 songs have tripled their chart lifetime since the 1960s, the highest-ranked songs maintain their positions for far longer than previously, and the lowest-ranked songs are replaced more frequently than ever. At the same time, who occupies the chart has also changed over the years: In recent years, fewer new artists make it into the chart and more positions are occupied by established hit makers. Finally, investigating how song chart trajectories have changed over time, we show that historical song trajectories cluster into clear trajectory archetypes characteristic of the time period they were part of. The results are interesting in the context of collective attention: Whereas recent studies have documented that other cultural products such as books, news, and movies fade in popularity quicker in recent years, music hits seem to last longer now than in the past.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. Billboard charts legend. Accessed: 2023-05-07.
  2. 40+ fascinating music streaming statistics (2023 updated). 2023.
  3. The ledger: Are there really 100,000 new songs uploaded a day? maybe more. 2023.
  4. Ryan tedder: Classic songs are strangling new music. 2021.
  5. The structure of social influence in recommender networks. DOI: 10.1145/3366423.3380020 (2020).
  6. Origins of algorithmic instabilities in crowdsourced ranking. \JournalTitleProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, 1–20, DOI: 10.1145/3415237 (2020).
  7. Cosimato, A. et al. The conundrum of success in music: Playing it or talking about it? \JournalTitleIEEE Access 7, 1–1, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937743 (2019).
  8. Social network markets: A new definition of the creative industries. \JournalTitleJournal of Cultural Economics 32, 167–185, DOI: 10.1007/s10824-008-9066-y (2008).
  9. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. \JournalTitleScience (New York, N.Y.) 311, 854–6, DOI: 10.1126/science.1121066 (2006).
  10. The universal decay of collective memory and attention. \JournalTitleNature Human Behaviour 3, DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0474-5 (2019).
  11. Accelerating dynamics of collective attention. \JournalTitleNature communications 10, 1759 (2019).
  12. Controlling popularity bias in learning-to-rank recommendation. RecSys ’17, DOI: 10.1145/3109859.3109912 (2017).
  13. Consumer choice and the popular music industry: A test of the superstar theory. \JournalTitleEmpirica 29, 1–9, DOI: 10.1023/A:1014651130414 (2002).
  14. Winner-take-all markets. \JournalTitleStudies in Microeconomics 1, 131–154, DOI: 10.1177/2321022213501254 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/2321022213501254.
  15. Long tails vs. superstars: The effect of information technology on product variety and sales concentration patterns. \JournalTitleInformation Systems Research 21, 736–747, DOI: 10.1287/isre.1100.0325 (2010).
  16. Fewer blockbusters and more superstars: How technological innovation has impacted convergence on the music charts. \JournalTitleInternational Journal of Research in Marketing 33, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.07.006 (2015).
  17. Social media, traditional media, and music sales. \JournalTitleMIS Quarterly 38, 101–122 (2014).
  18. Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. \JournalTitleJASIST 60, 2169–2188, DOI: 10.1002/asi.21149 (2009).
  19. Understanding musical diversity via online social media. 9, 308–317, DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v9i1.14620 (2021).
  20. Memory remains: Understanding collective memory in the digital age. \JournalTitleScience Advances 3, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1602368 (2016).
  21. Berg, J. M. One-hit wonders versus hit makers: Sustaining success in creative industries. \JournalTitleAdministrative Science Quarterly 67, 630–673, DOI: 10.1177/00018392221083650 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392221083650.
  22. Success and luck in creative careers. \JournalTitleEPJ Data Science 9, DOI: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00227-w (2020).
  23. Liu, L. et al. Hot streaks in artistic, cultural, and scientific careers. \JournalTitleNature 559, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0315-8 (2018).
  24. Data-driven predictions in the science of science. \JournalTitleScience 355, 477–480, DOI: 10.1126/science.aal4217 (2017).
  25. Quantifying and predicting success in show business. \JournalTitleNature Communications 10, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10213-0 (2019).
  26. Quantifying reputation and success in art. \JournalTitleScience 362, eaau7224, DOI: 10.1126/science.aau7224 (2018).
  27. Emergence of scaling in random networks. \JournalTitlescience 286, 509–512 (1999).
  28. A bayesian lifetime model for the "hot 100" billboard songs. \JournalTitleJournal of the American Statistical Association 96, 368–381 (2001).
  29. Interiano, M. et al. Musical trends and predictability of success in contemporary songs in and out of the top charts. \JournalTitleRoyal Society Open Science 5, 171274, DOI: 10.1098/rsos.171274 (2018).
  30. Success in books: a big data approach to bestsellers. \JournalTitleEPJ Data Science 7, DOI: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0135-y (2018).
  31. Hazelkorn, E. Global Rankings and the Geopolitics of Higher Education Understanding the influence and impact of rankings on higher education, policy and society (2016).
  32. Newman, M. Power laws, pareto distributions and zipf’s law. \JournalTitleContemporary Physics - CONTEMP PHYS 46, DOI: 10.1080/00107510500052444 (2004).
  33. Dynamics of ranking. \JournalTitleNature Communications 13, 1646, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29256-x (2022).
  34. Blumm, N. et al. Dynamics of ranking processes in complex systems. \JournalTitlePhys. Rev. Lett. 109, 128701, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.128701 (2012).
  35. Talent and experience shape competitive social hierarchies. \JournalTitlePhysical Review E 98, DOI: 10.1103/physreve.98.020302 (2018).
  36. Ranking-based rich-get-richer processes. \JournalTitleThe Annals of Applied Probability 33, 4366 – 4394, DOI: 10.1214/22-AAP1921 (2023).
  37. Fixed-time descriptive statistics underestimate extremes of epidemic curve ensembles. \JournalTitleNature physics 17, 5–8 (2021).
  38. Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. \JournalTitleScience Advances 1, e1400005–e1400005, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1400005 (2015).
  39. Must be the music: Examining the placement effects of character-brand association and brand prestige on consumer brand interest within the music video context. \JournalTitleJournal of Promotion Management 21, 126–141, DOI: 10.1080/10496491.2014.971212 (2015).
  40. Information and the skewness of music sales. \JournalTitleJournal of Political Economy 117, 324–369, DOI: 10.1086/599283 (2009).

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now