Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

T-curator: a trust based curation tool for LOD logs (2405.07081v1)

Published 11 May 2024 in cs.DB and cs.CL

Abstract: Nowadays, companies are racing towards Linked Open Data (LOD) to improve their added value, but they are ignoring their SPARQL query logs. If well curated, these logs can present an asset for decision makers. A naive and straightforward use of these logs is too risky because their provenance and quality are highly questionable. Users of these logs in a trusted way have to be assisted by providing them with in-depth knowledge of the whole LOD environment and tools to curate these logs. In this paper, we propose an interactive and intuitive trust based tool that can be used to curate these LOD logs before exploiting them. This tool is proposed to support our approach proposed in our previous work Lanasri et al. [2020].

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. Trust-aware curation of linked open data logs. In International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, pages 604–614. Springer, 2020.
  2. Knowledge graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.02320, 2020.
  3. Dbpedia–a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from wikipedia. Semantic web, 6(2):167–195, 2015.
  4. Never-ending learning. Communications of the ACM, 61(5):103–115, 2018.
  5. Yago2: exploring and querying world knowledge in time, space, context, and many languages. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web, pages 229–232, 2011.
  6. Knowledge graph exploration: where are we and where are we going? ACM SIGWEB Newsletter, (Summer 2020):1–8, 2020.
  7. The contribution of linked open data to augment a traditional data warehouse. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, pages 1–25, 2020.
  8. Building data warehouses with semantic web data. Decision Support Systems, 52(4):853–868, 2012.
  9. Enabling olap analyses on the web of data. In 2016 Eleventh International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM), pages 215–224. IEEE, 2016.
  10. Rdf analytics: lenses over semantic graphs. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web, pages 467–478, 2014.
  11. Qb4olap: a new vocabulary for olap cubes on the semantic web. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Consuming Linked Data, volume 905, pages 27–38. CEUR-WS. org, 2012.
  12. Lsq: the linked sparql queries dataset. In International semantic web conference, pages 261–269. Springer, 2015.
  13. Know what you don’t know: Unanswerable questions for squad. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03822, 2018.
  14. Core techniques of question answering systems over knowledge bases: a survey. Knowledge and Information systems, 55(3):529–569, 2018.
  15. An analytical study of large sparql query logs. The VLDB Journal, 29(2):655–679, 2020.
  16. Enhancing source selection for live queries over linked data via query log mining. In JIST, pages 176–191, 2011.
  17. Loglinc: Log queries of linked open data investigator for cube design. In DEXA, pages 352–367, 2019.
  18. Towards a reference ontology of trust. In OTM Conferences, pages 3–21, 2019.
  19. Linking trust to data quality. In METHOD Workshop, 2015.
  20. I Suriarachchi and B Plale. Crossing analytics systems: A case for integrated provenance in data lakes. In e-Science, pages 349–354, 2016.
  21. The common ontology of value and risk. In ER, pages 121–135, 2018.
  22. D Gambetta et al. Can we trust trust? The British Journal of Sociology, 13:213–237, 2000.
  23. Data civilizer 2.0: a holistic framework for data preparation and analytics. VLDB Endowment, 12(12):1954–1957, 2019.
  24. Building data curation processes with crowd intelligence. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pages 29–42. Springer, 2020.
  25. O Hartig. Querying trust in rdf data with tsparql. In European Semantic Web Conference, pages 5–20. Springer, 2009.
  26. M Mazzieri. A fuzzy rdf semantics to represent trust metadata. In 1st Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP2004), volume 1, pages 83–89, 2004.
  27. The triql. p browser: Filtering information using context-, content-and rating-based trust policies. In Proceedings of the Semantic Web and Policy Workshop at the 4th International Semantic Web Conference, volume 7, pages 12–20, 2005.
  28. Querying for provenance, trust, uncertainty and other meta knowledge in rdf. Journal of Web Semantics, 7(3):204–219, 2009.
  29. Setlbi: An integrated platform for semantic business intelligence. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020, pages 167–171, 2020.
  30. Corekg: a knowledge lake service. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 11(12):1942–1945, 2018.
  31. A Maccioni and R Torlone. Kayak: a framework for just-in-time data preparation in a data lake. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pages 474–489. Springer, 2018.
  32. Datasynapse: A social data curation foundry. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 37(3):351–384, 2019.
  33. Darql: Deep analysis of sparql queries. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018, pages 187–190, 2018.
  34. Semlex-a framework for visually exploring semantic query log analysis. In Semantic Web Conference-Poster and Demo Session, 2011.
  35. Crumbs4cube: Turning breadcrumbs into smart enriched data cubes. In ER Forum/Posters/Demos, pages 128–132, 2019.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets