Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Residual-NeRF: Learning Residual NeRFs for Transparent Object Manipulation (2405.06181v1)

Published 10 May 2024 in cs.CV and cs.RO

Abstract: Transparent objects are ubiquitous in industry, pharmaceuticals, and households. Grasping and manipulating these objects is a significant challenge for robots. Existing methods have difficulty reconstructing complete depth maps for challenging transparent objects, leaving holes in the depth reconstruction. Recent work has shown neural radiance fields (NeRFs) work well for depth perception in scenes with transparent objects, and these depth maps can be used to grasp transparent objects with high accuracy. NeRF-based depth reconstruction can still struggle with especially challenging transparent objects and lighting conditions. In this work, we propose Residual-NeRF, a method to improve depth perception and training speed for transparent objects. Robots often operate in the same area, such as a kitchen. By first learning a background NeRF of the scene without transparent objects to be manipulated, we reduce the ambiguity faced by learning the changes with the new object. We propose training two additional networks: a residual NeRF learns to infer residual RGB values and densities, and a Mixnet learns how to combine background and residual NeRFs. We contribute synthetic and real experiments that suggest Residual-NeRF improves depth perception of transparent objects. The results on synthetic data suggest Residual-NeRF outperforms the baselines with a 46.1% lower RMSE and a 29.5% lower MAE. Real-world qualitative experiments suggest Residual-NeRF leads to more robust depth maps with less noise and fewer holes. Website: https://residual-nerf.github.io

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (43)
  1. J. Ichnowski*, Y. Avigal*, J. Kerr, and K. Goldberg, “Dex-NeRF: Using a neural radiance field to grasp transparent objects,” in Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2020.
  2. X. Chen, H. Zhang, Z. Yu, A. Opipari, and O. C. Jenkins, “Clearpose: Large-scale transparent object dataset and benchmark,” in European Conference on Computer Vision, 2022.
  3. C. Phillips, M. Lecce, and K. Daniilidis, “Seeing glassware: from edge detection to pose estimation and shape recovery,” 06 2016.
  4. C. Xu, J. Chen, M. Yao, J. Zhou, L. Zhang, and Y. Liu, “6dof pose estimation of transparent object from a single rgb-d image,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 23, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/23/6790
  5. J. L. Schönberger and J.-M. Frahm, “Structure-from-motion revisited,” in Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.
  6. B. Mildenhall, P. P. Srinivasan, M. Tancik, J. T. Barron, R. Ramamoorthi, and R. Ng, “Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis,” in ECCV, 2020.
  7. J. Kerr, L. Fu, H. Huang, Y. Avigal, M. Tancik, J. Ichnowski, A. Kanazawa, and K. Goldberg, “Evo-nerf: Evolving nerf for sequential robot grasping of transparent objects,” in Proceedings of The 6th Conference on Robot Learning, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, K. Liu, D. Kulic, and J. Ichnowski, Eds., vol. 205.   PMLR, 14–18 Dec 2023, pp. 353–367. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v205/kerr23a.html
  8. ——, “Evo-nerf: Evolving nerf for sequential robot grasping of transparent objects,” in 6th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2022.
  9. T. Müller, A. Evans, C. Schied, and A. Keller, “Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding,” ACM Trans. Graph., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 102:1–102:15, Jul. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3528223.3530127
  10. C. Reiser, S. Peng, Y. Liao, and A. Geiger, “Kilonerf: Speeding up neural radiance fields with thousands of tiny mlps,” CoRR, vol. abs/2103.13744, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.13744
  11. L. Liu, J. Gu, K. Z. Lin, T.-S. Chua, and C. Theobalt, “Neural sparse voxel fields,” NeurIPS, 2020.
  12. A. Yu, R. Li, M. Tancik, H. Li, R. Ng, and A. Kanazawa, “PlenOctrees for real-time rendering of neural radiance fields,” in ICCV, 2021.
  13. C. Sun, M. Sun, and H. Chen, “Direct voxel grid optimization: Super-fast convergence for radiance fields reconstruction,” in CVPR, 2022.
  14. S. J. Garbin, M. Kowalski, M. Johnson, J. Shotton, and J. Valentin, “Fastnerf: High-fidelity neural rendering at 200fps,” in 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).   Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society, oct 2021, pp. 14 326–14 335. [Online]. Available: https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01408
  15. S. Lombardi, T. Simon, G. Schwartz, M. Zollhoefer, Y. Sheikh, and J. Saragih, “Mixture of volumetric primitives for efficient neural rendering,” ACM Trans. Graph., vol. 40, no. 4, jul 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3450626.3459863
  16. K. Deng, A. Liu, J. Zhu, and D. Ramanan, “Depth-supervised nerf: Fewer views and faster training for free,” in 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).   Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society, jun 2022, pp. 12 872–12 881. [Online]. Available: https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01254
  17. B. Attal, E. Laidlaw, A. Gokaslan, C. Kim, C. Richardt, J. Tompkin, and M. O’Toole, “Törf: Time-of-flight radiance fields for dynamic scene view synthesis,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, 2021.
  18. Y. Wei, S. Liu, Y. Rao, W. Zhao, J. Lu, and J. Zhou, “Nerfingmvs: Guided optimization of neural radiance fields for indoor multi-view stereo,” in ICCV, 2021.
  19. T. Neff, P. Stadlbauer, M. Parger, A. Kurz, J. H. Mueller, C. R. A. Chaitanya, A. S. Kaplanyan, and M. Steinberger, “DONeRF: Towards Real-Time Rendering of Compact Neural Radiance Fields using Depth Oracle Networks,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 40, no. 4, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14340
  20. E. Sucar, S. Liu, J. Ortiz, and A. Davison, “iMAP: Implicit mapping and positioning in real-time,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021.
  21. J. Tang, “Torch-ngp: a pytorch implementation of instant-ngp,” 2022, https://github.com/ashawkey/torch-ngp.
  22. D. Verbin, P. Hedman, B. Mildenhall, T. Zickler, J. T. Barron, and P. P. Srinivasan, “Ref-NeRF: Structured view-dependent appearance for neural radiance fields,” CVPR, 2022.
  23. B. Mildenhall, P. Hedman, R. Martin-Brualla, P. P. Srinivasan, and J. T. Barron, “NeRF in the dark: High dynamic range view synthesis from noisy raw images,” CVPR, 2022.
  24. J. Y. Zhang, G. Yang, S. Tulsiani, and D. Ramanan, “NeRS: Neural reflectance surfaces for sparse-view 3d reconstruction in the wild,” in Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021.
  25. J. Chibane, A. Bansal, V. Lazova, and G. Pons-Moll, “Stereo radiance fields (srf): Learning view synthesis from sparse views of novel scenes,” in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).   IEEE, jun 2021.
  26. P. Truong, M.-J. Rakotosaona, F. Manhardt, and F. Tombari, “Sparf: Neural radiance fields from sparse and noisy poses.”   IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR, 2023.
  27. M. Niemeyer, J. T. Barron, B. Mildenhall, M. S. M. Sajjadi, A. Geiger, and N. Radwan, “Regnerf: Regularizing neural radiance fields for view synthesis from sparse inputs,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022.
  28. J. Y. Zhang, A. Lin, M. Kumar, T.-H. Yang, D. Ramanan, and S. Tulsiani, “Cameras as rays: Pose estimation via ray diffusion,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2024.
  29. C.-H. Lin, W.-C. Ma, A. Torralba, and S. Lucey, “Barf: Bundle-adjusting neural radiance fields,” in IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021.
  30. L. Yen-Chen, P. Florence, J. T. Barron, A. Rodriguez, P. Isola, and T.-Y. Lin, “iNeRF: Inverting neural radiance fields for pose estimation,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2021.
  31. Y. Chen, X. Chen, X. Wang, Q. Zhang, Y. Guo, Y. Shan, and F. Wang, “Local-to-global registration for bundle-adjusting neural radiance fields,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 8264–8273.
  32. Y. Jeong, S. Ahn, C. Choy, A. Anandkumar, M. Cho, and J. Park, “Self-calibrating neural radiance fields,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), October 2021, pp. 5846–5854.
  33. J. Fang, T. Yi, X. Wang, L. Xie, X. Zhang, W. Liu, M. Nießner, and Q. Tian, “Fast dynamic radiance fields with time-aware neural voxels,” in SIGGRAPH Asia 2022 Conference Papers, 2022.
  34. B. P. Duisterhof, Z. Mandi, Y. Yao, J.-W. Liu, M. Z. Shou, S. Song, and J. Ichnowski, “Md-splatting: Learning metric deformation from 4d gaussians in highly deformable scenes,” 2023.
  35. G. Wu, T. Yi, J. Fang, L. Xie, X. Zhang, W. Wei, W. Liu, Q. Tian, and W. Xinggang, “4d gaussian splatting for real-time dynamic scene rendering,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08528, 2023.
  36. J. Luiten, G. Kopanas, B. Leibe, and D. Ramanan, “Dynamic 3d gaussians: Tracking by persistent dynamic view synthesis,” in 3DV, 2024.
  37. C. Reiser, S. Peng, Y. Liao, and A. Geiger, “Kilonerf: Speeding up neural radiance fields with thousands of tiny mlps,” 2021.
  38. M. Tancik, V. Casser, X. Yan, S. Pradhan, B. Mildenhall, P. P. Srinivasan, J. T. Barron, and H. Kretzschmar, “Block-nerf: Scalable large scene neural view synthesis,” 2022.
  39. X. Zhang, S. Bi, K. Sunkavalli, H. Su, and Z. Xu, “Nerfusion: Fusing radiance fields for large-scale scene reconstruction,” CVPR, 2022.
  40. E. Xie, W. Wang, W. Wang, P. Sun, H. Xu, D. Liang, and P. Luo, “Segmenting transparent objects in the wild with transformer,” 08 2021, pp. 1194–1200.
  41. Y. R. Wang, Y. Zhao, H. Xu, S. Eppel, A. Aspuru-Guzik, F. Shkurti, and A. Garg, “Mvtrans: Multi-view perception of transparent objects,” 2023.
  42. J. Mahler, J. Liang, S. Niyaz, M. Laskey, R. Doan, X. Liu, J. A. Ojea, and K. Goldberg, “Dex-net 2.0: Deep learning to plan robust grasps with synthetic point clouds and analytic grasp metrics,” CoRR, vol. abs/1703.09312, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09312
  43. B. O. Community, “Blender - a 3d modelling and rendering package,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.blender.org
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper proposes an innovative method combining a background NeRF with a residual NeRF mediated by a Mixnet to enhance depth perception for transparent objects.
  • It achieves significantly improved accuracy by reducing RMSE by 46.1% and MAE by 29.5% compared to existing approaches.
  • The approach increases training speed and robustness, enabling effective manipulation of transparent objects in various real-world applications.

Enhancing Depth Perception for Transparent Object Manipulation Using Neural Radiance Fields

Introduction to the Approach

The manipulation of transparent objects by robots remains a complex challenge due to the difficulties depth sensors face in accurately capturing the spatial details of these objects. This paper proposes an innovative approach, which we will refer to as "Enhanced NeRF," to improve depth perception of transparent objects using neural radiance fields (NeRFs). NeRFs have been previously recognized for their effectiveness in photorealistic scene reconstruction from multiple views using implicit neural representations. However, their application to scenes with transparent objects still presents significant hurdles, especially under variable lighting conditions and with complex object shapes.

"Enhanced NeRF" leverages a static scene's background by learning its NeRF without any transparent objects present first. This prior knowledge helps in reducing ambiguities when transparent objects are introduced into the scene. The method involves the innovative use of two additional neural networks: a residual NeRF and a Mixnet. The residual NeRF captures changes introduced by transparent objects, and the Mixnet intelligently combines the information from the background and residual NeRFs.

The suggested approach promises not only improved accuracy in depth mapping but also a quicker training process, beneficial for practical applications where rapid deployment is crucial.

Key Contributions and Findings

The paper outlines several key contributions and findings from the application of "Enhanced NeRF":

  1. Algorithm Development: Introduction of an innovative method that combines a background NeRF with a residual NeRF mediated by a novel Mixnet, aiming to enhance transparency handling in robotic vision.
  2. Improved Depth Mapping Accuracy: The experiments demonstrate that "Enhanced NeRF" significantly outperforms existing approaches, reducing root mean square error (RMSE) by 46.1% and mean absolute error (MAE) by 29.5% compared to the baselines. This improvement in depth perception accuracy is crucial for tasks requiring high precision such as in pharmaceutical environments or precise industrial applications.
  3. Enhanced Training Speed and Robustness: Results from synthetic and real-world experiments confirm that the approach not only speeds up the training process but also produces more robust depth maps. This robustness translates into more reliable grasping and manipulation actions by robots.

Practical Implications

The success of "Enhanced NeRF" in generating accurate and robust depth maps for transparent objects has significant implications:

  • Robotics in Industry and Healthcare: Robots with enhanced capabilities for manipulating transparent objects can be deployed in more complex and varied tasks, such as handling delicate glassware in labs or picking and placing transparent components in industrial assembly lines.
  • Home Robotics: Improved handling of transparent objects can lead to better functionality for home-based robotic systems, such as in kitchens or other areas where transparent items like glasses or clear utensils are common.

Future Directions

While "Enhanced NeRF" marks a substantial improvement, there is an ample scope for further research:

  • Exploring More Complex Scenes: Future studies could extend these methods to more dynamically changing scenes or environments with a higher density of transparent objects.
  • Integration with Other Techniques: Combining this approach with advanced algorithms for object recognition and localization could lead to more comprehensive solutions for robotic vision systems.
  • Addressing Diverse Lighting Conditions: Further research could optimize these models for variable lighting conditions, enhancing their adaptability and utility in real-world applications.

Conclusion

"Enhanced NeRF" provides a promising advancement in the field of robotic manipulation of transparent objects, offering both enhanced performance in depth perception and training speed. The approach's ability to leverage static background knowledge significantly reduces the complexity involved in accurately recognizing and handling transparent materials. Future explorations and improvements on this foundation are poised to further revolutionize robotic capabilities in various applications, aligning with the growing demand for automation across numerous sectors.