Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Fully Automated Selfish Mining Analysis in Efficient Proof Systems Blockchains (2405.04420v1)

Published 7 May 2024 in cs.CR

Abstract: We study selfish mining attacks in longest-chain blockchains like Bitcoin, but where the proof of work is replaced with efficient proof systems -- like proofs of stake or proofs of space -- and consider the problem of computing an optimal selfish mining attack which maximizes expected relative revenue of the adversary, thus minimizing the chain quality. To this end, we propose a novel selfish mining attack that aims to maximize this objective and formally model the attack as a Markov decision process (MDP). We then present a formal analysis procedure which computes an $\epsilon$-tight lower bound on the optimal expected relative revenue in the MDP and a strategy that achieves this $\epsilon$-tight lower bound, where $\epsilon>0$ may be any specified precision. Our analysis is fully automated and provides formal guarantees on the correctness. We evaluate our selfish mining attack and observe that it achieves superior expected relative revenue compared to two considered baselines. In concurrent work [Sarenche FC'24] does an automated analysis on selfish mining in predictable longest-chain blockchains based on efficient proof systems. Predictable means the randomness for the challenges is fixed for many blocks (as used e.g., in Ouroboros), while we consider unpredictable (Bitcoin-like) chains where the challenge is derived from the previous block.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. 2022. https://ethereum.org/en/roadmap/merge/.
  2. Adam Back. 1997. Hashcash. http://hashcash.org/.
  3. Proof-of-Stake Longest Chain Protocols: Security vs Predictability. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Workshop on Developments in Consensus, ConsensusDay 2022, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 7 November 2022, Jorge M. Soares, Dawn Song, and Marko Vukolic (Eds.). ACM, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3560829.3563559
  4. Verifiable Delay Functions. IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch. (2018), 601. https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/601
  5. Formal Barriers to Longest-Chain Proof-of-Stake Protocols. CoRR abs/1809.06528 (2018). arXiv:1809.06528 http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.06528
  6. Jing Chen and Silvio Micali. 2019. Algorand: A secure and efficient distributed ledger. Theor. Comput. Sci. 777 (2019), 155–183.
  7. Bram Cohen and Krzysztof Pietrzak. 2019. The chia network blockchain. https://docs.chia.net/assets/files/Precursor-ChiaGreenPaper-82cb50060c575f3f71444a4b7430fb9d.pdf
  8. Bram Cohen and Krzysztof Pietrzak. 2023. Chia Greenpaper. https://docs.chia.net/green-paper-abstract
  9. Ouroboros Praos: An adaptively-secure, semi-synchronous proof-of-stake protocol. IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch. (2017), 573. http://eprint.iacr.org/2017/573
  10. Proofs of Space. In Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO 2015 - 35th Annual Cryptology Conference, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, August 16-20, 2015, Proceedings, Part II (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9216), Rosario Gennaro and Matthew Robshaw (Eds.). Springer, 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48000-7_29
  11. Ittay Eyal and Emin Gün Sirer. 2018. Majority is not enough: bitcoin mining is vulnerable. Commun. ACM 61, 7 (2018), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/3212998
  12. Lei Fan and Hong-Sheng Zhou. 2017. iChing: A Scalable Proof-of-Stake Blockchain in the Open Setting (or, How to Mimic Nakamoto’s Design via Proof-of-Stake). IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch. (2017), 656. http://eprint.iacr.org/2017/656
  13. Optimal Strategic Mining Against Cryptographic Self-Selection in Proof-of-Stake. In EC. ACM, 89–114.
  14. Matheus V. X. Ferreira and S. Matthew Weinberg. 2021. Proof-of-Stake Mining Games with Perfect Randomness. In EC ’21: The 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, Budapest, Hungary, July 18-23, 2021, Péter Biró, Shuchi Chawla, and Federico Echenique (Eds.). ACM, 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1145/3465456.3467636
  15. Jerzy Filar and Koos Vrieze. 2012. Competitive Markov decision processes. Springer Science & Business Media.
  16. The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol: Analysis and Applications. In EUROCRYPT (2) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9057). Springer, 281–310.
  17. Tight Consistency Bounds for Bitcoin. In CCS. ACM, 819–838.
  18. The probabilistic model checker Storm. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 24, 4 (2022), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-021-00633-z
  19. SquirRL: Automating Attack Analysis on Blockchain Incentive Mechanisms with Deep Reinforcement Learning. In NDSS. The Internet Society.
  20. PRISM 4.0: Verification of Probabilistic Real-Time Systems. In CAV (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6806). Springer, 585–591.
  21. Satoshi Nakamoto. 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
  22. James R Norris. 1998. Markov chains. Number 2. Cambridge university press.
  23. SpaceMint: A Cryptocurrency Based on Proofs of Space. In Financial Cryptography (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10957). Springer, 480–499.
  24. Analysis of the Blockchain Protocol in Asynchronous Networks. In EUROCRYPT (2) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10211). 643–673.
  25. Krzysztof Pietrzak. 2019. Simple Verifiable Delay Functions. In ITCS (LIPIcs, Vol. 124). Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 60:1–60:15.
  26. Martin L. Puterman. 1994. Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. Wiley.
  27. Optimal Selfish Mining Strategies in Bitcoin. In Financial Cryptography (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9603). Springer, 515–532.
  28. Deep Selfish Proposing in Longest-Chain Proof-of-Stake Protocols. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security.
  29. Proof-of-Stake Longest Chain Protocols Revisited. CoRR abs/1910.02218 (2019).
  30. Benjamin Wesolowski. 2018. Efficient verifiable delay functions. IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch. (2018), 623. https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/623
  31. Efficient MDP Analysis for Selfish-Mining in Blockchains. In AFT. ACM, 113–131.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.