Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Modular, Tendon Driven Variable Stiffness Manipulator with Internal Routing for Improved Stability and Increased Payload Capacity (2405.01925v1)

Published 3 May 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: Stability and reliable operation under a spectrum of environmental conditions is still an open challenge for soft and continuum style manipulators. The inability to carry sufficient load and effectively reject external disturbances are two drawbacks which limit the scale of continuum designs, preventing widespread adoption of this technology. To tackle these problems, this work details the design and experimental testing of a modular, tendon driven bead-style continuum manipulator with tunable stiffness. By embedding the ability to independently control the stiffness of distinct sections of the structure, the manipulator can regulate it's posture under greater loads of up to 1kg at the end-effector, with reference to the flexible state. Likewise, an internal routing scheme vastly improves the stability of the proximal segment when operating the distal segment, reducing deviations by at least 70.11%. Operation is validated when gravity is both tangential and perpendicular to the manipulator backbone, a feature uncommon in previous designs. The findings presented in this work are key to the development of larger scale continuum designs, demonstrating that flexibility and tip stability under loading can co-exist without compromise.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. K. C. Galloway, K. P. Becker, B. Phillips, J. Kirby, S. Licht, D. Tchernov, R. J. Wood, and D. F. Gruber, “Soft Robotic Grippers for Biological Sampling on Deep Reefs,” Soft Robotics, vol. 3, pp. 23–33, March 2016.
  2. B. Gombert, “Robot arm,” Oct. 2014.
  3. M. Hiltz, C. Rice, K. Boyle, and R. Allison, “Canadarm: 20 years of mission success through adaptation,” in International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation, 2001.
  4. G. Li, X. Chen, F. Zhou, Y. Liang, Y. Xiao, X. Cao, Z. Zhang, M. Zhang, B. Wu, S. Yin, and et al., “Self-powered soft robot in the mariana trench,” Nature, vol. 591, p. 66–71, Mar 2021.
  5. M. A. Robertson and J. Paik, “New soft robots really suck: Vacuum-powered systems empower diverse capabilities,” Science Robotics, vol. 2, pp. 1–11, Aug. 2017.
  6. A. A. Faudzi, N. I. Azmi, M. Sayahkarajy, W. L. Xuan, and K. Suzumori, “Soft manipulator using thin McKibben actuator,” in IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), pp. 334–339, July 2018.
  7. H. Stuart, S. Wang, O. Khatib, and M. R. Cutkosky, “The Ocean One hands: An adaptive design for robust marine manipulation,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 36, pp. 150–166, Feb. 2017.
  8. Y. Fang, X. Dong, A. Mohammad, and D. Axinte, “Design and Control of a Multiple-Section Continuum Robot With a Hybrid Sensing System,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 28, pp. 1522–1533, June 2023.
  9. D. Rollinson, Y. Bilgen, B. Brown, F. Enner, S. Ford, C. Layton, J. Rembisz, M. Schwerin, A. Willig, P. Velagapudi, and H. Choset, “Design and architecture of a series elastic snake robot,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 4630–4636, Sept. 2014.
  10. X. Chen, X. Zhang, Y. Huang, L. Cao, and J. Liu, “A review of soft manipulator research, applications, and opportunities,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 39, pp. 281–311, May 2022.
  11. R. Pfeifer and G. Gómez, “Morphological Computation – Connecting Brain, Body, and Environment,” in Creating Brain-Like Intelligence, pp. 66–83, Springer, 2009.
  12. T. George Thuruthel, Y. Ansari, E. Falotico, and C. Laschi, “Control Strategies for Soft Robotic Manipulators: A Survey,” Soft Robotics, vol. 5, pp. 149–163, April 2018.
  13. P. Kumar Singh and C. M. Krishna, “Continuum arm robotic manipulator: A review,” Universal Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 2, no. 6, p. 193–198, 2014.
  14. D. Bruder, M. A. Graule, C. B. Teeple, and R. J. Wood, “Increasing the payload capacity of soft robot arms by localized stiffening,” Science Robotics, vol. 8, Aug. 2023.
  15. K. Tadakuma, T. Fujimoto, M. Watanabe, T. Shimizu, E. Takane, M. Konyo, and S. Tadokoro, “Fire-Resistant Deformable Soft Gripper Based on Wire Jamming Mechanism,” in 2020 3rd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), pp. 740–747, May 2020.
  16. R. Mukaide, M. Watanabe, K. Tadakuma, Y. Ozawa, T. Takahashi, M. Konyo, and S. Tadokoro, “Radial-Layer Jamming Mechanism for String Configuration,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, pp. 5221–5228, Oct. 2020.
  17. P. Molaei, N. A. Pitts, and H. B. Gilbert, “Independent Tendons Increase Stiffness of Continuum Robots without Actuator Coupling,” in 2023 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), pp. 72–78, June 2023.
  18. W. Liu, Z. Jing, J. Huang, X. Dun, L. Qiao, H. Leung, and W. Chen, “An Inchworm-Snake Inspired Flexible Robotic Manipulator With Multisection SMA Actuators for Object Grasping,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 70, pp. 12616–12625, Dec. 2023.
  19. M. Cianchetti, A. Licofonte, M. Follador, F. Rogai, and C. Laschi, “Bioinspired Soft Actuation System Using Shape Memory Alloys,” Actuators, vol. 3, pp. 226–244, July 2014.
  20. I. Onda, M. Watanabe, K. Tadakuma, K. Abe, and S. Tadokoro, “Tube Mechanism with 3-axis Rotary Joints Structure to Achieve Variable Stiffness Using Positive Pressure,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, pp. 1–8, Jan. 2023.
  21. J. Lin and Z.-H. Zhou, “Design and Implementation of a Cable-Driven Dexterous Continuum Manipulators in Confined Space Usage,” in International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET), pp. 1–6, July 2022.
  22. R. J. Webster and B. A. Jones, “Design and kinematic modeling of constant curvature continuum robots: A review,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 29, p. 1661–1683, Jun 2010.
  23. K. Yeongjin, S. S. Cheng, M. Diakite, R. P. Gullapalli, J. M. Simard, and J. P. Desail, “Toward the development of a flexible mesoscale mri-compatible neurosurgical continuum robot,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 33, no. 6, p. 1386–1397, 2017.
  24. D. C. Rucker and R. J. Webster III, “Statics and dynamics of continuum robots with general tendon routing and external loading,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 27, p. 1033–1044, Dec 2011.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.