Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Conceiving Naturally After IVF: the effect of assisted reproduction on obstetric interventions and child health at birth (2405.00234v2)

Published 30 Apr 2024 in econ.GN and q-fin.EC

Abstract: A growing share of the world's population is being born via assisted reproductive technology (ART), including in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). However, two concerns persist. First, ART pregnancies correlate with predictors of poor outcomes at birth--and it is unclear whether this relationship is causal. Second, the emotional and financial costs associated with ART-use might exacerbate defensive medical behaviour, where physicians intervene more than necessary to reduce the risk of adverse medical outcomes and litigation. We address the challenge of identifying the pure effect of ART-use on both maternal and infant outcomes at birth by leveraging exogenous variation in the success of ART cycles. We compare the obstetric outcomes for ART-conceived births with those of spontaneously-conceived births after a failed ART treatment. Moreover, we flexibly adjust for key confounders using double machine learning. We do this using clinical registry ART data and administrative maternal and infant data from New South Wales (NSW) between 2009-2017. We find that ART slightly decreases the risk of obstetric interventions, lowering the risk of a caesarean section and increasing the rate of spontaneous labour (+3.5 p.p.). Moreover, we find that ART has a statistically and clinically insignificant effect on infant health outcomes. Keywords: Fertility, Assisted reproduction, IVF, Caesarean Section, Obstetric, Infertility. JEL classification: I10, I12, I19.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (54)
  1. Abramowitz, J. (2014). Turning back the ticking clock: the effect of increased affordability of assisted reproductive technology on women’s marriage timing. Journal of Population Economics, 27(2):603–633.
  2. ABS (2001). Australian standard geographical classification (asgc). Statistical Geography, 1.
  3. ABS (2011). Socio-economic indexes for areas (seifa).
  4. ACOG (2023). How does age affect fertility? Faq, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/having-a-baby-after-age-35-how-aging-affects-fertility-and-pregnancy Accessed: 2024-02-15.
  5. The impact of advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcome. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 70:2–9. Reproduction at an Advanced Maternal Age.
  6. The health of children conceived by ART: ‘the chicken or the egg?’. Human Reproduction Update, 25(2):137–158.
  7. Malpractice risk and medical treatment selection. Journal of Public Economics, 174:22–35.
  8. Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. The Lancet, 392(10155):1358–1368.
  9. Health and labor market impacts of twin birth: Evidence from a swedish ivf policy mandate.
  10. Health disparities and infertility: impacts of state-level insurance mandates. Fertility and Sterility, 85(4):858–865.
  11. Utilization of Infertility Treatments: The Effects of Insurance Mandates. Demography, 49(1):125–149.
  12. Obstetric outcomes and congenital abnormalities after in vitro maturation, in vitro fertilization, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 110(4).
  13. Buckles, K. S. (2013). Infertility insurance mandates and multiple births. Health Economics, 22(7):775–789.
  14. The health impacts of hospital delivery practices. Working Paper 25986, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  15. A bespoke data linkage of an ivf clinical quality registry to population health datasets; methods and performance. International Journal of Population Data Science, 6(1).
  16. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014†. Human Reproduction, 36(11):2921–2934.
  17. The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: an international analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 101(1):191–198.e4.
  18. Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1):C1–C68.
  19. Population-wide contribution of medically assisted reproductive technologies to overall births in Australia: temporal trends and parental characteristics. Human Reproduction, 37(5):1047–1058.
  20. Making Sense of Sensitivity: Extending Omitted Variable Bias. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 82(1):39–67.
  21. Apgar score and risk of neonatal death among preterm infants. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(1):49–57.
  22. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE†: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM)‡ for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Human Reproduction, 33(9):1586–1601.
  23. The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates. Journal of Health Economics, 18(4):491–522.
  24. ART in Europe, 2018: results generated from European registries by ESHRE†. Human Reproduction Open, 2022(3):hoac022.
  25. Singleton pregnancies conceived with infertility treatments and the risk of neonatal and infant mortality. Fertility and Sterility, 116(6):1515–1523.
  26. Older yet fairer: How extended reproductive time horizons reshaped marriage patterns in israel. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 13(1):198–234.
  27. The power of time: The impact of free ivf on women’s human capital investments. European Economic Review, 133:103645.
  28. Health care access, costs, and treatment dynamics: Evidence from in vitro fertilization. American Economic Review, 108(12):3725–77.
  29. The effects of insurance mandates on choices and outcomes in infertility treatment markets. Health Economics, 21(8):994–1016.
  30. Hansen, B. E. (2022). A modern gauss–markov theorem. Econometrica, 90(3):1283–1294.
  31. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ, 328(7434):261.
  32. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: A meta-analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 103(3).
  33. Physician spending and subsequent risk of malpractice claims: observational study. BMJ, 351.
  34. Assisted reproductive technology and women’s choice to pursue professional careers. Journal of Population Economics, 30(3):723–769.
  35. “an unnecessary cut?” multilevel health systems analysis of drivers of caesarean sections rates in italy: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20(1):770.
  36. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 12(10):1–15.
  37. Can women have children and a career? iv evidence from ivf treatments. American Economic Review, 107(6):1611–37.
  38. Effect of overweight and obesity on assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 13(5):433–444.
  39. Perinatal outcomes by mode of assisted conception and sub-fertility in an australian data linkage cohort. PLOS ONE, 9(1):1–10.
  40. Quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation: Which covariates are really important to predict cumulative live birth and which models are best? Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 86:102309.
  41. Assisted reproductive technology in australia and new zealand 2018. Sydney: National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, the University of New South Wales, Sydney, pages 1–83.
  42. Risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology: a cohort study from the CoNARTaS group. Human Reproduction, 30(7):1724–1731.
  43. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 18(5):485–503.
  44. Obesity and infertility. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity, 14(6).
  45. Five and 10 minute apgar scores and risks of cerebral palsy and epilepsy: population based cohort study in sweden. BMJ, 360.
  46. Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes among singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 295(2):285–301.
  47. Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee (2021). Code of Practice for Assisted Reproductive Technology Units. Code of practice, Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand.
  48. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1):41–55.
  49. Schmidt, L. (2005). Infertility insurance mandates and fertility. American Economic Review: P&P, 95(2):204–208.
  50. Schmidt, L. (2007). Effects of infertility insurance mandates on fertility. Journal of Health Economics, 26(3):431–446.
  51. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance—united states, 2015. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 67(3):1.
  52. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy-related hypertensive complications: a systematic review. Journal of Human Hypertension, 27(3):148–157.
  53. Separating parental and treatment contributions to perinatal health after fresh and frozen embryo transfer in assisted reproduction: A cohort study with within-sibship analysis. PLOS Medicine, 18(6):1–20.
  54. Unintended consequences of policy interventions: Evidence from mandated health insurance coverage for ivf treatment. American Journal of Health Economics. Forthcoming.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.