Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Image Quality Assessment With Compressed Sampling (2404.17170v2)

Published 26 Apr 2024 in cs.CV and eess.IV

Abstract: No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) aims at estimating image quality in accordance with subjective human perception. However, most methods focus on exploring increasingly complex networks to improve the final performance,accompanied by limitations on input images. Especially when applied to high-resolution (HR) images, these methods offen have to adjust the size of original image to meet model input.To further alleviate the aforementioned issue, we propose two networks for NR-IQA with Compressive Sampling (dubbed CL-IQA and CS-IQA). They consist of four components: (1) The Compressed Sampling Module (CSM) to sample the image (2)The Adaptive Embedding Module (AEM). The measurements are embedded by AEM to extract high-level features. (3) The Vision Transformer and Scale Swin TranBlocksformer Moudle(SSTM) to extract deep features. (4) The Dual Branch (DB) to get final quality score. Experiments show that our proposed methods outperform other methods on various datasets with less data usage.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. “Compressed learning: Universal sparse dimensionality reduction and learning in the measurement domain,” .
  2. “The smashed filter for compressive classification and target recognition,” in Computational Imaging V, Charles A. Bouman, Eric L. Miller, and Ilya Pollak, Eds. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2007, vol. 6498, p. 64980H, SPIE.
  3. “Multilinear compressive learning,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1512–1524, 2021.
  4. “Transcl: Transformer makes strong and flexible compressive learning,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 5236–5251, 2023.
  5. “K-svd: An algorithm for designing overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 4311–4322, 2006.
  6. “Data-driven tight frame construction and image denoising,” Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 89–105, 2014.
  7. “Deep networks for compressed image sensing,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2017, pp. 877–882.
  8. “Content-aware scalable deep compressed sensing,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 31, pp. 5412–5426, 2022.
  9. “End-to-end blind image quality assessment using deep neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1202–1213, 2018.
  10. “Blindly assess image quality in the wild guided by a self-adaptive hyper network,” in 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. 3664–3673.
  11. “Metaiqa: Deep meta-learning for no-reference image quality assessment,” in 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. 14131–14140.
  12. “Fast-vqa: Efficient end-to-end video quality assessment with fragment sampling,” in European Conference on Computer Vision, 2022.
  13. “Deep neural networks for no-reference and full-reference image quality assessment,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 206–219, 2018.
  14. “Blind image quality assessment using a deep bilinear convolutional neural network,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 36–47, 2020.
  15. “Transformer for image quality assessment,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2021, pp. 1389–1393.
  16. “From patches to pictures (paq-2-piq): Mapping the perceptual space of picture quality,” in 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. 3572–3582.
  17. “No-reference image quality assessment via transformers, relative ranking, and self-consistency,” in 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2022, pp. 3989–3999.
  18. “Re-iqa: Unsupervised learning for image quality assessment in the wild,” 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 5846–5855, 2023.
  19. “Maniqa: Multi-dimension attention network for no-reference image quality assessment,” 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), pp. 1190–1199, 2022.
  20. “A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 3440–3451, 2006.
  21. “Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy,” J. Electronic Imaging, vol. 19, pp. 011006, 2010.
  22. “Image database tid 2013 : Peculiarities , results and perspectives,” 2016.
  23. “Kadid-10k: A large-scale artificially distorted iqa database,” in 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 2019, pp. 1–3.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Ronghua Liao (1 paper)
  2. Chen Hui (10 papers)
  3. Lang Yuan (1 paper)
  4. Feng Jiang (98 papers)
  5. Haiqi Zhu (9 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets