Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Semantic Routing for Enhanced Performance of LLM-Assisted Intent-Based 5G Core Network Management and Orchestration (2404.15869v1)

Published 24 Apr 2024 in cs.NI and cs.AI

Abstract: LLMs are rapidly emerging in AI applications, especially in the fields of natural language processing and generative AI. Not limited to text generation applications, these models inherently possess the opportunity to leverage prompt engineering, where the inputs of such models can be appropriately structured to articulate a model's purpose explicitly. A prominent example of this is intent-based networking, an emerging approach for automating and maintaining network operations and management. This paper presents semantic routing to achieve enhanced performance in LLM-assisted intent-based management and orchestration of 5G core networks. This work establishes an end-to-end intent extraction framework and presents a diverse dataset of sample user intents accompanied by a thorough analysis of the effects of encoders and quantization on overall system performance. The results show that using a semantic router improves the accuracy and efficiency of the LLM deployment compared to stand-alone LLMs with prompting architectures.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (13)
  1. J. Mcnamara et al., “NLP powered intent based network management for private 5G networks,” IEEE Access, 2023.
  2. M. T. R. Laskar, X.-Y. Fu, C. Chen, and S. B. Tn, “Building real-world meeting summarization systems using large language models: A practical perspective,” arXiv:2310.19233, 2023.
  3. H. Chen et al., “ChatGPT’s one-year anniversary: Are open-source large language models catching up?” arXiv:2311.16989, 2023.
  4. A. Zafar, V. B. Parthasarathy, C. L. Van, S. Shahid, and A. Shahid, “Building trust in conversational AI: A comprehensive review and solution architecture for explainable, privacy-aware systems using LLMs and knowledge graph,” arXiv:2308.13534, 2023.
  5. F. Wu, N. Zhang, S. Jha, P. McDaniel, and C. Xiao, “A new era in LLM security: Exploring security concerns in real-world LLM-based systems,” arXiv:2402.18649, 2024.
  6. S. Balloccu, P. Schmidtová, M. Lango, and O. Dušek, “Leak, cheat, repeat: Data contamination and evaluation malpractices in closed-source LLMs,” arXiv:2402.03927, 2024.
  7. A. Leivadeas and M. Falkner, “A survey on intent-based networking,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 625–655, 2022.
  8. K. Dzeparoska, A. Tizghadam, and A. Leon-Garcia, “Intent assurance using LLMs guided by intent drift,” arXiv:2402.00715, 2024.
  9. J. Wang et al., “Network meets ChatGPT: Intent autonomous management, control and operation,” J. Commun. Inf. Netw., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 239–255, 2023.
  10. D. M. Manias, A. Chouman, and A. Shami, “Towards intent-based network management: Large language models for intent extraction in 5G core networks,” Accepted in DRCN, 2024.
  11. “Intent driven management services for mobile networks,” 3GPP, Technical Specification (TS) 28.312, 2024, version 18.3.0. [Online]. Available: https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/28_series/28.312/
  12. Aurelio AI, “Semantic Router — Aurelio AI,” https://www.aurelio.ai/semantic-router (accessed Apr. 17, 2024).
  13. A. Chouman, D. M. Manias, and A. Shami, “A modular, end-to-end next-generation network testbed: Towards a fully automated network management platform,” arXiv:2403.15376, 2024.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Dimitrios Michael Manias (17 papers)
  2. Ali Chouman (8 papers)
  3. Abdallah Shami (78 papers)

Summary

Semantic Routing Enhances LLM-Assisted 5G Core Network Management

Overview of Semantic Routing Implementation

The paper explores the implementation of a semantic router within the framework of LLM-assisted intent-based management and orchestration of 5G core networks. The semantic router aims to enhance both the accuracy and efficiency of system performance. This is achieved through deterministic routing, where semantic understanding is utilized to guide user intents to appropriate handling mechanisms within the network.

Research Methods and Findings

System Architecture:

The architecture integrates a semantic router which interprets user intents and subsequently routes these to the correct processing paths within the 5G core network. This approach diverges from common LLM applications by limiting the scope wherein LLM operates, hence reducing error rates such as hallucination effects and boosting response times.

Dataset and Intent Classification:

A diverse dataset representing various user intents as described by the 3GPP standards was prepared. This dataset facilitated a comprehensive paper on the effects of encoder choice and quantization on the router's ability to classify intents accurately.

Key Experiments and Results:

  1. Utterance Training:
    • Increasing the number and diversity of utterances (seed, variability, paraphrased) linked directly to improved model performance. This confirms the hypothesis that richer input data enhances the model's understanding and classification accuracy.
  2. Encoder Effectiveness:
    • Comparisons between different encoders revealed significant performance disparities. Closed-source encoders like those from OpenAI presented higher accuracy levels compared to open-source alternatives like Hugging Face’s offerings, though at potential cost implications and loss of transparency.
  3. Quantization Impact:
    • The quantization level applied to LLMs did not significantly affect the performance, suggesting that lower-resource deployment could be viable without sacrificing accuracy.
  4. Comparison with Legacy Methods:
    • The semantic router significantly outperformed traditional LLM prompting methods in terms of both speed and reliability.

Practical Implications

Network Operations:

The utilisation of semantic routers offers a tangible improvement in managing Intent-Based Networking (IBN) for 5G cores, particularly in minimizing misinterpretations and accelerating response times which are critical for real-time applications in telecommunications.

Model Deployment:

The findings support scaled deployment of LLMs in network management, leveraging quantization to reduce computational demands without diminishing performance. Additionally, the use of deterministic routing via semantic routers provides a more reliable alternative compared to traditional LLM prompting.

Future Research Directions

  • Linguistic Techniques Enhancement:

Exploring additional linguistic transformations to augment data diversity, such as back translation and tone adjustments, could further enhance the robustness of intent classification.

  • Dynamic Routing Integration:

Evolving from static to dynamic routes could enable real-time interactions with live network environments, promoting adaptive and intelligent network management.

  • Integration of Multiple Intent Handling:

Investigating methods to manage combinations of multiple intents within single requests could refine processing efficiency and accuracy.

Conclusion

The implementation of a semantic routing in LLM-assisted 5G core network management not only improves the reliability and efficiency of intent classification but also sets a scalable model for future network technologies. This research frames a notable advancement in applying artificial intelligence in telecommunications, particularly within the scope of 5G and possibly future network standards.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown