Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Can a Machine be Conscious? Towards Universal Criteria for Machine Consciousness (2404.15369v2)

Published 19 Apr 2024 in q-bio.NC, cs.AI, and cs.CY

Abstract: As artificially intelligent systems become more anthropomorphic and pervasive, and their potential impact on humanity more urgent, discussions about the possibility of machine consciousness have significantly intensified, and it is sometimes seen as 'the holy grail'. Many concerns have been voiced about the ramifications of creating an artificial conscious entity. This is compounded by a marked lack of consensus around what constitutes consciousness and by an absence of a universal set of criteria for determining consciousness. By going into depth on the foundations and characteristics of consciousness, we propose five criteria for determining whether a machine is conscious, which can also be applied more generally to any entity. This paper aims to serve as a primer and stepping stone for researchers of consciousness, be they in philosophy, computer science, medicine, or any other field, to further pursue this holy grail of philosophy, neuroscience and artificial intelligence.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (73)
  1. Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2023. Technical report, 10 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.03715.
  2. Cosmin Badea. Have a Break from Making Decisions, Have a MARS: The Multi-valued Action Reasoning System. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), volume 13652 LNAI, pages 359–366, 2022. ISBN 9783031214400. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21441-7_31. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:237440197.
  3. Natasha Tiku. Google engineer Blake Lemoine thinks its LaMDA AI has come to life, 6 2022. URL https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/06/11/google-ai-lamda-blake-lemoine/.
  4. Matthew Urwin. Top 20 Humanoid Robots in Use Right Now, 2023. URL https://builtin.com/robotics/humanoid-robots.
  5. Blaise Agüera y Arcas. Artificial neural networks are making strides towards consciousness, according to Blaise Agüera y Arcas , 2022. URL https://archive.ph/y3mj9.
  6. David J. Chalmers. Could a Large Language Model be Conscious? 3 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.07103.
  7. Moral exemplars for the virtuous machine: the clinician’s role in ethical artificial intelligence for healthcare. AI and Ethics, 2(1):167–175, 2022. ISSN 2730-5961. doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00089-6. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00089-6.
  8. Nicholas Agar. How to Treat Machines that Might Have Minds. Philosophy and Technology, 33(2):269–282, 2020. ISSN 22105441. doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00357-8. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00357-8.
  9. Elisabeth Hildt. The Prospects of Artificial Consciousness: Ethical Dimensions and Concerns. AJOB Neuroscience, 14(2):58–71, 2023. ISSN 21507759. doi:10.1080/21507740.2022.2148773.
  10. Threats by artificial intelligence to human health and human existence. BMJ Global Health, 8(5):10435, 2023. ISSN 20597908. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010435. URL http://gh.bmj.com/.
  11. If Our Aim Is to Build Morality into an Artificial Agent, How Might We Begin to Go about Doing So? IEEE Intelligent Systems, 38(6):35–41, 2023. ISSN 19411294. doi:10.1109/MIS.2023.3320875. URL http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MIS.2023.3320875.
  12. Establishing Meta-Decision-Making for AI: An Ontology of Relevance, Representation and Reasoning. ArXiv, abs/2210.0, 2022. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:252683273.
  13. Morality, Machines, and the Interpretation Problem: A Value-based, Wittgensteinian Approach to Building Moral Agents. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 13652 LNAI:124–137, 2022. ISSN 16113349. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21441-7_9. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:232110434.
  14. Minimum Levels of Interpretability for Artificial Moral Agents. ArXiv, abs/2307.0, 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00660.
  15. Developing moral AI to support decision-making about antimicrobial use. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(11):912–915, 2022. ISSN 2522-5839. doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00558-5. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00558-5.
  16. Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness. 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08708.
  17. Theories of consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 23(7):439–452, 2022. ISSN 14710048. doi:10.1038/s41583-022-00587-4. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-022-00587-4.
  18. An adversarial collaboration to critically evaluate theories of consciousness. bioRxiv, page 2023.06.23.546249, 6 2023. doi:10.1101/2023.06.23.546249. URL https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.23.546249v2%0Ahttps://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.23.546249v2.abstract.
  19. Daniel Dennett. Consciousness Explained. Little, Brown and Co., 1991. ISBN 0-316-18065-3.
  20. Consciousness: Here, there and everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1668), 5 2015. ISSN 14712970. doi:10.1098/RSTB.2014.0167. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0167.
  21. Will We Ever Have Conscious Machines? Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 14:556544, 12 2020. ISSN 16625188. doi:10.3389/FNCOM.2020.556544/BIBTEX.
  22. John R Searle. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3):417–424, 1980. ISSN 0140-525X. doi:DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00005756. URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/minds-brains-and-programs/DC644B47A4299C637C89772FACC2706A.
  23. Breaking bad news in the era of artificial intelligence and algorithmic medicine: an exploration of disclosure and its ethical justification using the hedonic calculus., 10 2022. ISSN 2730-5961 (Electronic).
  24. Measuring Consciousness in the Intensive Care Unit. Neurocritical Care, 38(3):584–590, 2023. ISSN 15560961. doi:10.1007/s12028-023-01706-4. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-023-01706-4.
  25. Willful Modulation of Brain Activity in Disorders of Consciousness. N Engl J Med, 362:579–89, 2010. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0905370.
  26. Functional geometry of the cortex encodes dimensions of consciousness. Nature Communications, 14(1):1–15, 1 2023. ISSN 20411723. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35764-7. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35764-7.
  27. David J. Chalmers. The Conscious Mind. Oxford University Press, 1996. ISBN 978-0195117899.
  28. Thomas Nagel. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4):435–450, 4 1974. ISSN 00318108, 15581470. doi:10.2307/2183914. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2183914.
  29. Giulio Tononi. Consciousness as integrated information: A provisional manifesto. Biological Bulletin, 215(3):216–242, 2008. ISSN 00063185. doi:10.2307/25470707.
  30. John R. Searle. Our Shared Consciousness, 2013. URL https://www.ted.com/talks/john_searle_our_shared_condition_consciousness.
  31. Max Tegmark. Consciousness as a state of matter. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 76:238–270, 2015. ISSN 09600779. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2015.03.014.
  32. John R. Searle. Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence, 2015. URL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHKwIYsPXLg.
  33. Jonathan Smith. On the Soul by Aristotle, 2007. URL http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.html.
  34. Leonard Dung. Tests of Animal Consciousness are Tests of Machine Consciousness. Erkenntnis, 2023. ISSN 1572-8420. doi:10.1007/s10670-023-00753-9. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-023-00753-9.
  35. Brian Tomasik. Do Artificial Reinforcement-Learning Agents Matter Morally? ArXiv, abs/1410.8, 2014. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8233.
  36. Hilary Putnam. Psychophysical Predicates. In W Capitan and D Merril, editors, Art, Mind and Religion. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 1967.
  37. Rene Descartes. Discourse on the method of rightly conducting the reason, and seeking truth in the sciences. 1637. doi:10.5214/ans.0972.7531.2009.160207.
  38. Daniel Dennett. The illusion of consciousness. In TED Talks, 2003. URL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjbWr3ODbAohttps://www.ted.com/talks/dan_dennett_on_our_consciousness%0Ahttps://www.ted.com/talks/dan_dennett_on_our_consciousness/transcript?language=en.
  39. Keith Frankish. What if your consciousness is an illusion created by your brain? | Aeon Essays, 2019. URL https://aeon.co/essays/what-if-your-consciousness-is-an-illusion-created-by-your-brain.
  40. David J. Chalmers. Debunking arguments for illusionism about consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 27(5-6):258–281, 2020. ISSN 13558250.
  41. David J. Chalmers. Why is consciousness so mysterious?, 2013. URL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTIk9MN3T6w.
  42. John Stuart Mill. An examination of Sir William Hamilton’s philosophy and of the principal philosophical questions discussed in his writings, 1865. URL file://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/007708207http://hdl.handle.net/2027/hvd.32044084597442http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc2.ark:/13960/t1bk1kv4khttp://hdl.handle.net/2027/coo1.ark:/13960/t98633b4m.
  43. A. M. Turing. Computing Machinery and Intelligence Author ( s ): A . M . Turing Source : Mind , New Series , Vol . 59 , No . 236 ( Oct ., 1950 ), pp . 433-460 Published by : Oxford University Press on behalf of the Mind Association Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/sta. Mind, 59(236):433–460, 1950.
  44. While you were sleepwalking: Science and neurobiology of sleep disorders & the enigma of legal responsibility of violence during parasomnia. Neuroethics, 8(2):203–214, 2015. ISSN 18745504. doi:10.1007/s12152-015-9229-4.
  45. Sidney Carls-Diamante. Where Is It Like to Be an Octopus? Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 16, 3 2022. ISSN 16625137. doi:10.3389/FNSYS.2022.840022/FULL.
  46. Criteria for consciousness in humans and other mammals. Consciousness and Cognition, 14(1):119–139, 2005. ISSN 1053-8100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.08.006. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810004000893.
  47. David J. Chalmers. Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness. The Character of Consciousness, 2(3):3–34, 2011. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311105.003.0001.
  48. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. The Monadology. 1898. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1426-7_68.
  49. Patrik Vuilleumier. Hemispatial neglect. The Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology of Stroke, 28:148–197, 2007. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511544880.010.
  50. Cortical Blindness BT - Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. pages 972–978. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018. ISBN 978-3-319-57111-9. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1354. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1354.
  51. Suzana Herculano-Houzel. The human brain in numbers: A linearly scaled-up primate brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3(NOV):1–11, 2009. ISSN 16625161. doi:10.3389/neuro.09.031.2009.
  52. Life without a cerebellum. Brain, 133(3):652–654, 3 2010. ISSN 0006-8950. doi:10.1093/brain/awq030. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq030.
  53. A new case of complete primary cerebellar agenesis: Clinical and imaging findings in a living patient. Brain, 138(6):e353, 2015. ISSN 14602156. doi:10.1093/brain/awu239.
  54. Brain of a white-collar worker, 7 2007. ISSN 01406736. URL www.thelancet.com.
  55. Roger Lewin. Is your brain really necessary? Science, 210(4475):1232–1234, 12 1980. ISSN 00368075. doi:10.1126/science.7434023. URL https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.7434023.
  56. Life without a brain: Neuroradiological and behavioral evidence of neuroplasticity necessary to sustain brain function in the face of severe hydrocephalus. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 2019. ISSN 20452322. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53042-3. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53042-3.
  57. Volumetric MRI analysis of a case of severe ventriculomegaly. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 12 2018. ISSN 16625161. doi:10.3389/FNHUM.2018.00495/FULL.
  58. Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7):450–461, 2016. ISSN 14710048. doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.44. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.44.
  59. The emergence of human consciousness: From fetal to neonatal life. Pediatric Research, 65(3):255–260, 2009. ISSN 00313998. doi:10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181973b0d.
  60. The search for the neural correlate of consciousness: Progress and challenges. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 2, 2021. doi:10.33735/phimisci.2021.87. URL https://philosophymindscience.org/index.php/phimisci/article/view/9151/8689.
  61. The Current of Consciousness: Neural Correlates and Clinical Aspects. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 23(7):345–352, 2023. ISSN 15346293. doi:10.1007/s11910-023-01276-0. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-023-01276-0.
  62. David J. Chalmers. What Is a Neural Correlate of Consciousness? In Thomas Metzinger, editor, Neural Correlates of Consciousness: Empirical and Conceptual Questions. MIT Press, 2000. doi:10.7551/mitpress/7111.003.0024.
  63. What are the computational correlates of consciousness? Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 17:101–113, 7 2016. ISSN 2212683X. doi:10.1016/j.bica.2016.07.009.
  64. Advancing the science of consciousness: from ethics to clinical care. 2016. doi:10.31234/OSF.IO/SUTRC. URL https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/sutrc/.
  65. Neurological Bedside Examination: “Can I Confirm My Anatomical Hypothesis?” BT - Neurology at the Bedside. pages 85–136. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023. ISBN 978-3-031-43335-1. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43335-1_3. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43335-1_3.
  66. Royal College of Physicians. Prolonged disorders of consciousness following sudden onset brain injury. Technical report, Royal College of Physicians, London, 2020. URL https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/guidelines-policy/prolonged-disorders-consciousness-following-sudden-onset-brain-injury-national-clinical-guidelines.
  67. Prolonged disorders of consciousness: A response to a “critical evaluation of the new UK guidelines.”. Clinical Rehabilitation, 36(9):1267–1275, 9 2022. ISSN 14770873. doi:10.1177/02692155221099704.
  68. Communicating With Unconscious Patients: An Overview. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 42(1), 2023. ISSN 0730-4625. URL https://journals.lww.com/dccnjournal/fulltext/2023/01000/communicating_with_unconscious_patients__an.2.aspx.
  69. The misdiagnosis of prolonged disorders of consciousness by a clinical consensus compared with repeated coma-recovery scale-revised assessment. BMC Neurology, 20(1), 2020. ISSN 14712377. doi:10.1186/s12883-020-01924-9. URL https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01924-9.
  70. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. 2009. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-35. URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/35.
  71. Prolonged disorders of consciousness: a critical evaluation of the new UK guidelines. Brain, 144(6):1655–1660, 2021. ISSN 14602156. doi:10.1093/brain/awab063. URL https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/144/6/1655/6199232.
  72. What is consciousness, and could machines have it? Science, 358(6362):486–492, 10 2017. ISSN 10959203. doi:10.1126/science.aan8871. URL https://www.science.org.
  73. Preserved consciousness in vegetative and minimal conscious states: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 87(5):485–492, 5 2016. ISSN 0022-3050. doi:10.1136/JNNP-2015-310958. URL https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/87/5/485https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/87/5/485.abstract.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Cosmin Badea (8 papers)
  2. Nur Aizaan Anwar (1 paper)

Summary

Can a Machine be Conscious? A Framework for Universal Criteria

The paper entitled "Can a Machine be Conscious? Towards Universal Criteria for Machine Consciousness" by Nur Aizaan Anwar and Cosmin Badea engages with the longstanding question of machine consciousness. As artificial intelligence systems evolve towards more human-like features, the discourse about the prospects and implications of creating conscious machines has gained momentum. Nonetheless, the scientific and philosophical communities lack consensus on what constitutes consciousness, thereby presenting the need for a set of universal criteria.

The authors propose five criteria that they argue are necessary for assessing whether a machine—or indeed any entity—can be considered conscious. These criteria are put forward as a means to advance discussions in several interdisciplinary fields, including philosophy, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence, ideally affording researchers a robust framework for inquiry.

Key Criteria for Machine Consciousness

  1. Existence of Consciousness: The foundational premise is that consciousness must exist for it to be studied or replicated in machines. The paper discusses Descartes' cogito ("I think, therefore I am") as evidence supporting the existence of personal consciousness, though skepticism exists regarding extending this certainty to other entities.
  2. Consciousness Is Not Solipsistic: This criterion accepts that consciousness is not isolated to one's self, negating solipsism. The authors endorse the view that other beings, though potentially inherently unknowable, share the property of consciousness, paving the way for evaluating machines under similar assumptions.
  3. Sufficiency of Matter: By considering materialist perspectives, this criterion argues that physical substrates, such as the human brain, are necessary and possibly sufficient for supporting consciousness. Evidence from neuroscience and anomalies in brain structure among humans posits that consciousness is tied to the functional dynamics of biological systems.
  4. Conduciveness of Structures: This point recognizes that specific structures (biological or artificial) must manifest necessary properties conducive to consciousness. While the paper references Integrated Information Theory as one potential framework, generalizability to non-biological structures remains an open research area.
  5. Observable Correlates of Consciousness: The final criterion necessitates that consciousness should be empirically observable, positing a challenge given the subjective nature of conscious experience. In this regard, behavioral and neuroimaging approaches in humans provide proxies, but translations to non-biological systems like machines require further methodological advances.

Critical Insights and Implications

The paper navigates the complex landscape of consciousness studies, weaving through philosophical perspectives, neuroscientific evidence, and potential implications for artificial systems. A key insight is the importance of fostering a multifaceted approach—rooted as much in robust scientific methodologies as in philosophy—to understand and potentially replicate consciousness.

Moreover, while the model aims to be widely applicable, current technological and theoretical limitations imply that achieving consensual and practical criteria for machine consciousness will necessitate collaborative advancements in several domains. In practical terms, the implications could stretch into ethics, particularly concerning the rights and moral consideration owed to potentially conscious machines.

Future Directions

In discussing the potential for machine consciousness, the paper highlights the need for refined definitions and methodological rigor. Future research will likely explore alternative frameworks, such as computational neuroscience and embodiment theories, which might offer new insights or alternative criteria aligned with the dynamic properties of biological consciousness.

Additionally, as AI models grow more sophisticated, ethical considerations regarding the deployment and treatment of potentially conscious machines will require careful deliberation, guided by empirical findings and philosophical debate. Progress in this domain could yield transformative implications across cognitive sciences and artificial intelligence, leading to new paradigms in human-machine interaction and beyond.

In summary, the authors present thought-provoking criteria with the aim of engaging a broad research community in addressing one of the most profound questions in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Can machines truly achieve consciousness?

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

YouTube