Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Optimized Dynamic Mode Decomposition for Reconstruction and Forecasting of Atmospheric Chemistry Data (2404.12396v1)

Published 13 Apr 2024 in cs.LG, math.DS, physics.ao-ph, stat.AP, and stat.ML

Abstract: We introduce the optimized dynamic mode decomposition algorithm for constructing an adaptive and computationally efficient reduced order model and forecasting tool for global atmospheric chemistry dynamics. By exploiting a low-dimensional set of global spatio-temporal modes, interpretable characterizations of the underlying spatial and temporal scales can be computed. Forecasting is also achieved with a linear model that uses a linear superposition of the dominant spatio-temporal features. The DMD method is demonstrated on three months of global chemistry dynamics data, showing its significant performance in computational speed and interpretability. We show that the presented decomposition method successfully extracts known major features of atmospheric chemistry, such as summertime surface pollution and biomass burning activities. Moreover, the DMD algorithm allows for rapid reconstruction of the underlying linear model, which can then easily accommodate non-stationary data and changes in the dynamics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (46)
  1. Daniel J Jacob. Introduction to atmospheric chemistry. Princeton university press, 1999.
  2. Data-Driven Science and Engineering: Machine Learning, Dynamical Systems, and Control. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
  3. Scalable diagnostics for global atmospheric chemistry using ristretto library (version 1.0). Geoscientific Model Development, 12(4):1525–1539, 2019.
  4. Dynamic Mode Decomposition: Data-Driven Modeling of Complex Systems. SIAM-Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, USA, 2016.
  5. Variable projection methods for an optimized dynamic mode decomposition. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 17(1):380–416, 2018.
  6. Bagging, optimized dynamic mode decomposition for robust, stable forecasting with spatial and temporal uncertainty quantification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 380(2229):20210199, 2022.
  7. A survey of projection-based model reduction methods for parametric dynamical systems. SIAM Review, 57:483–531, 06 2015.
  8. Athanasios C. Antoulas. Approximation of Large-Scale Dynamical Systems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2005.
  9. Reduced basis methods for partial differential equations: An introduction. 01 2015.
  10. Certified Reduced Basis Methods for Parametrized Partial Differential Equations. 01 2016.
  11. Galerkin v. least-squares Petrov–Galerkin projection in nonlinear model reduction. Journal of Computational Physics, 330:693–734, 2017.
  12. Data driven governing equations approximation using deep neural networks. Journal of Computational Physics, 395:620–635, oct 2019.
  13. A parallel hierarchical blocked adaptive cross approximation algorithm. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 34(4):394–408, 2020.
  14. E. Parish and K. Carlberg. Time-series machine-learning error models for approximate solutions to parameterized dynamical systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 365:112990, 2020.
  15. Combining data assimilation and machine learning to build data-driven models for unknown long time dynamics—applications in cardiovascular modeling. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 37(7):e3471, 2021.
  16. Peter J. Schmid. Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 656:5–28, 2010.
  17. Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 641:115 – 127, 12 2009.
  18. J Nathan Kutz. Data-driven modeling & scientific computation: methods for complex systems & big data. Oxford University Press, 2013.
  19. From fourier to koopman: Spectral methods for long-term time series prediction. CoRR, abs/2004.00574, 2020.
  20. Variants of dynamic mode decomposition: Boundary condition, koopman, and fourier analyses. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 22(6):887–915, 2012.
  21. Dynamic mode decomposition with control. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 15(1):142–161, 2016.
  22. Adaptive separation control of a laminar boundary layer using online dynamic mode decomposition. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 903:A21, 2020.
  23. Randomized matrix decompositions using r. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.02148, 2016.
  24. Compressed sensing and dynamic mode decomposition. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2(2):165–191, 2015.
  25. Nonlinear model order reduction via dynamic mode decomposition. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 39(5):B778–B796, 2017.
  26. Multiresolution dynamic mode decomposition. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 15(2):713–735, 2016.
  27. Multiresolution convolutional autoencoders. Journal of Computational Physics, 474:111801, 2023.
  28. Modeling of Atmospheric Chemistry. Cambridge University Press, 2017.
  29. Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106(D19):23073–23095, 2001.
  30. Geos-chem high performance (gchp): A next-generation implementation of the geos-chem chemical transport model for massively parallel applications. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2018:1–18, 2018.
  31. Development of a grid-independent geos-chem chemical transport model (v9-02) as an atmospheric chemistry module for earth system models. Geoscientific Model Development, 8(3):595–602, 2015.
  32. Global simulation of tropospheric chemistry at 12.5 km resolution: performance and evaluation of the geos-chem chemical module (v10-1) within the nasa geos earth system model (geos-5 esm). Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 2018:1–32, 2018.
  33. Tropospheric bromine chemistry: implications for present and pre-industrial ozone and mercury. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12(15):6723–6740, 2012.
  34. Ozone and organic nitrates over the eastern united states: Sensitivity to isoprene chemistry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118(19):11,256–11,268, 2013.
  35. Optimized regional and interannual variability of lightning in a global chemical transport model constrained by lis/otd satellite data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 117(D20):n/a–n/a, 2012. D20307.
  36. Fast-j2: Accurate simulation of stratospheric photolysis in global chemical models. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 41(3):281–296, Mar 2002.
  37. Chemistry of hydrogen oxide radicals (hox𝑥{}_{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT) in the arctic troposphere in spring. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(13):5823–5838, 2010.
  38. Development and evaluation of the unified tropospheric–stratospheric chemistry extension (ucx) for the global chemistry-transport model geos-chem. Atmospheric Environment, 89:52 – 63, 2014.
  39. On dynamic mode decomposition: Theory and applications. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 1(2):391–421, 2014.
  40. Shervin Bagheri. Effects of weak noise on oscillating flows: Linking quality factor, Floquet modes, and Koopman spectrum. Physics of Fluids, 26(9), 09 2014.
  41. Characterizing and correcting for the effect of sensor noise in the dynamic mode decomposition. Experiments in Fluids, 57(3):42, 2016.
  42. De-biasing the dynamic mode decomposition for applied koopman spectral analysis of noisy datasets. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 31(4):349–368, 2017.
  43. Separable nonlinear least squares: the variable projection method and its applications. Inverse problems, 19(2):R1, 2003.
  44. The differentiation of pseudo-inverses and nonlinear least squares problems whose variables separate. SIAM Journal on numerical analysis, 10(2):413–432, 1973.
  45. Charles J. Stone R.A. Olshen Leo Breiman, Jerome Friedman. Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1984.
  46. Towards understanding ensemble, knowledge distillation and self-distillation in deep learning. 12 2020.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.