Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Use of Parallel Explanatory Models to Enhance Transparency of Neural Network Configurations for Cell Degradation Detection (2404.11311v1)

Published 17 Apr 2024 in cs.LG

Abstract: In a previous paper, we have shown that a recurrent neural network (RNN) can be used to detect cellular network radio signal degradations accurately. We unexpectedly found, though, that accuracy gains diminished as we added layers to the RNN. To investigate this, in this paper, we build a parallel model to illuminate and understand the internal operation of neural networks, such as the RNN, which store their internal state in order to process sequential inputs. This model is widely applicable in that it can be used with any input domain where the inputs can be represented by a Gaussian mixture. By looking at the RNN processing from a probability density function perspective, we are able to show how each layer of the RNN transforms the input distributions to increase detection accuracy. At the same time we also discover a side effect acting to limit the improvement in accuracy. To demonstrate the fidelity of the model we validate it against each stage of RNN processing as well as the output predictions. As a result, we have been able to explain the reasons for the RNN performance limits with useful insights for future designs for RNNs and similar types of neural network.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. D. Mulvey, C. H. Foh, M. A. Imran, and R. Tafazolli, “Cell coverage degradation detection using deep learning techniques,” in 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC).   IEEE, 2018, pp. 441–447.
  2. ——, “Cell fault management using machine learning techniques,” IEEE Access, 2019.
  3. DARPA Explainable Artificial Intelligence Program, “https://www.darpa.mil/program/explainable-artificial-intelligence,” 2020.
  4. T. Zhang, K. Zhu, and D. Nyato, “A Generative Adversarial Learning-Based Approach for Cell Outage Detection in Self-Organizing Cellular Networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 9, no. 2, Feb. 2020.
  5. C. Zhang and P. C. Woodland, “High order recurrent neural networks for acoustic modelling,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).   IEEE, 2018, pp. 5849–5853.
  6. A. Zoha, A. Saeed, A. Imran, M. A. Imran, and A. Abu-Dayya, “Data-driven analytics for automated cell outage detection in self-organizing networks,” in Design of Reliable Communication Networks (DRCN), 2015 11th International Conference on the, Mar. 2015, pp. 203–210.
  7. D. Mulvey, C. H. Foh, M. A. Imran, and R. Tafazolli, “Improved neural network transparency for cell degradation detection using explanatory model.”   Dublin, Ireland: IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6.
  8. D. Gunning, “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI),” Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Broad Agency Announcement DARPA-BAA-16-53, 2016.
  9. D. Gunning and D. Aha, “Darpa’s explainable artificial intelligence (xai) program,” vol. 40, pp. 44–58.
  10. A. Karimi, G. Barthe, B. Balle, and I. Valera, “Model-agnostic counterfactual explanations for consequential decisions,” in The 23rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, AISTATS 2020, 26-28 August 2020, Online [Palermo, Sicily, Italy], ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, S. Chiappa and R. Calandra, Eds., vol. 108.   PMLR, 2020, pp. 895–905. [Online]. Available: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v108/karimi20a.html
  11. Z. Yang, A. Zhang, and A. Sudjianto, “Enhancing explainability of neural networks through architecture constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. PP, pp. 1–12, 2020.
  12. A. Adadi and M. Berrada, “Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (xai),” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 52 138–52 160, 2018.
  13. E. Tjoa and C. Guan, “A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (xai): Toward medical xai,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. PP, pp. 1–21, 2020.
  14. A. Heuillet, F. Couthouis, and N. Díaz-Rodríguez, “Explainability in deep reinforcement learning,” Aug. 2020.
  15. A. B. Arrieta, N. Díaz-Rodríguez, J. D. Ser, A. Bennetot, S. Tabik, A. Barbado, S. Garcia, S. Gil-Lopez, D. Molina, R. Benjamins, R. Chatila, and F. Herrera, “Explainable artificial intelligence (xai): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible ai,” vol. 58, pp. 82–115, 2020.
  16. M. Sundararajan, A. Taly, and Q. Yan, “Axiomatic attribution for deep networks,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2017, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 6-11 August 2017, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, D. Precup and Y. W. Teh, Eds., vol. 70.   PMLR, 2017, pp. 3319–3328. [Online]. Available: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/sundararajan17a.html
  17. P. Peng, Y. Zhang, H. Wang, and H. Zhang, “Towards robust and understandable fault detection and diagnosis using denoising sparse autoencoder and smooth integrated gradients,” 2021.
  18. G. S. W. Goh, S. Lapuschkin, L. Weber, W. Samek, and A. Binder, “Understanding integrated gradients with smoothtaylor for deep neural network attribution,” 2021.
  19. E. W. Weisstein, “Normal distribution,” Mathworld - A Wolfram Web Resource http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NormalDistribution.html.
  20. ——, “Normal sum distribution,” Mathworld - A Wolfram Web Resource http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NormalSumDistribution.html.
  21. ——, “Normal difference distribution,” Mathworld - A Wolfram Web Resource http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NormalDifferenceDistribution.html.
  22. 3GPP TR 36.873, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Study on 3D channel model for LTE (Release 12),” 2017-12, v12.7.0.
  23. 3GPP TS 36.214, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Layer;Measurements (Release 17),” 2022-03, v17.0.0.
  24. 3GPP TS 36.211, “3rd Generation Partnership Project;Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network;Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA);Physical channels and modulation(Release 17),” Jun. 2022-06, v17.2.0.
  25. 3GPP TS 37.320, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA) and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio measurement collection for Minimization of Drive Tests (MDT); Overall description; Stage 2 (Release 17),” 2022-03, v17.0.0.
  26. 3GPP TS 36.331, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio Resource Control RRC); Protocol Specification (Release 17),” 20122-03, v17.0.0.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.