Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Geometric Neural Operators (GNPs) for Data-Driven Deep Learning of Non-Euclidean Operators (2404.10843v1)

Published 16 Apr 2024 in cs.LG, cs.AI, math.OC, and stat.ML

Abstract: We introduce Geometric Neural Operators (GNPs) for accounting for geometric contributions in data-driven deep learning of operators. We show how GNPs can be used (i) to estimate geometric properties, such as the metric and curvatures, (ii) to approximate Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) on manifolds, (iii) learn solution maps for Laplace-Beltrami (LB) operators, and (iv) to solve Bayesian inverse problems for identifying manifold shapes. The methods allow for handling geometries of general shape including point-cloud representations. The developed GNPs provide approaches for incorporating the roles of geometry in data-driven learning of operators.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (48)
  1. “Geometric deep learning: Grids, groups, graphs, geodesics, and gauges” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.13478, 2021
  2. Alan Julian Izenman “Introduction to manifold learning” In Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 4.5 Wiley Online Library, 2012, pp. 439–446
  3. Andrew M Stuart “Inverse problems: a Bayesian perspective” In Acta numerica 19 Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 451–559
  4. Ryan Lopez and Paul J Atzberger “GD-VAEs: Geometric Dynamic Variational Autoencoders for Learning Nonlinear Dynamics and Dimension Reductions” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.05183, 2022 URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.05183
  5. “Meshfree methods on manifolds for hydrodynamic flows on curved surfaces: A Generalized Moving Least-Squares (GMLS) approach” In Journal of Computational Physics 409 Elsevier, 2020, pp. 109340 DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109340
  6. “Universal approximation to nonlinear operators by neural networks with arbitrary activation functions and its application to dynamical systems” In IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 6.4, 1995, pp. 911–917 DOI: 10.1109/72.392253
  7. “Neural Operator: Learning Maps Between Function Spaces” arXiv, 2021 DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV.2108.08481
  8. Walter A Strauss “Partial differential equations: An introduction” John Wiley & Sons, 2007
  9. Constantine Pozrikidis “Boundary integral and singularity methods for linearized viscous flow” Cambridge university press, 1992
  10. C Audouze, F De Vuyst and PB2589527 Nair “Reduced-order modeling of parameterized PDEs using time–space-parameter principal component analysis” In International journal for numerical methods in engineering 80.8 Wiley Online Library, 2009, pp. 1025–1057
  11. “Statistical and computational inverse problems” Springer Science & Business Media, 2006
  12. “Bayesian data analysis” ChapmanHall/CRC, 1995
  13. Mark Asch, Marc Bocquet and Maëlle Nodet “Data assimilation: methods, algorithms, and applications” SIAM, 2016
  14. “Geometric Deep Learning: Going beyond Euclidean data” In IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 34.4 IEEE, 2017, pp. 18–42 DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2017.2693418
  15. Larry Wasserman “Topological data analysis” In Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 5 Annual Reviews, 2018, pp. 501–532
  16. “Semantic3d. net: A new large-scale point cloud classification benchmark” In arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.03847, 2017
  17. “Parametric free-form shape design with PDE models and reduced basis method” In Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 199.23-24 Elsevier, 2010, pp. 1583–1592
  18. Charles Fefferman, Sanjoy Mitter and Hariharan Narayanan “Testing the manifold hypothesis” In Journal of the American Mathematical Society 29.4, 2016, pp. 983–1049
  19. “Isogeometric analysis: an overview and computer implementation aspects” In Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 117 Elsevier, 2015, pp. 89–116
  20. Bernard Haasdonk “Reduced basis methods for parametrized PDEs–a tutorial introduction for stationary and instationary problems” In Model reduction and approximation: theory and algorithms 15, 2017, pp. 65
  21. Alfio Quarteroni, Andrea Manzoni and Federico Negri “Reduced basis methods for partial differential equations: an introduction” Springer, 2015
  22. “Generalized reduced basis methods and n-width estimates for the approximation of the solution manifold of parametric PDEs” In Analysis and numerics of partial differential equations Springer, 2013, pp. 307–329
  23. “Model Reduction And Neural Networks For Parametric PDEs” In The SMAI Journal of computational mathematics 7 Société de Mathématiques Appliquées et Industrielles, 2021, pp. 121–157 DOI: 10.5802/smai-jcm.74
  24. Morris W Hirsch, Stephen Smale and Robert L Devaney “Differential equations, dynamical systems, and an introduction to chaos” Academic press, 2012
  25. “Dynamical systems V: bifurcation theory and catastrophe theory” Springer Science & Business Media, 2013
  26. “Manifold learning: what, how, and why” In Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 11 Annual Reviews, 2023
  27. “Data-driven computational mechanics” In Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 304 Elsevier, 2016, pp. 81–101
  28. Charles K Chui and Hrushikesh N Mhaskar “Deep nets for local manifold learning” In Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics 4 Frontiers Media SA, 2018, pp. 12
  29. “Geometry-informed neural operator for large-scale 3d pdes” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36, 2024
  30. “Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators” In Nature machine intelligence 3.3 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2021, pp. 218–229
  31. “Neural operator: learning maps between function spaces with applications to PDEs” In J. Mach. Learn. Res. 24, 2023, pp. Paper No. [89]\bibrangessep97 DOI: 10.1080/15502287.2022.2066031
  32. “Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations”, 2020 DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV.2010.08895
  33. “Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08895, 2020
  34. “Derivate Informed Neural Operator: An Efficient Framework for High-Dimensional Parametric Derivative Learning” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10745, 2022
  35. Anindya Chatterjee “An introduction to the proper orthogonal decomposition” In Current Science 78.7 Temporary Publisher, 2000, pp. 808–817 URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24103957
  36. Oliver T Schmidt and Tim Colonius “Guide to spectral proper orthogonal decomposition” In Aiaa journal 58.3 American Institute of AeronauticsAstronautics, 2020, pp. 1023–1033
  37. Peter J Schmid “Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data” In Journal of fluid mechanics 656 Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 5–28
  38. “Dynamic mode decomposition: data-driven modeling of complex systems” SIAM, 2016
  39. Peter J Schmid “Dynamic mode decomposition and its variants” In Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 54 Annual Reviews, 2022, pp. 225–254
  40. “Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations”, 2021 arXiv:2010.08895 [cs.LG]
  41. “Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations” In ICLR 2020 Workshop on Integration of Deep Neural Models and Differential Equations, 2019 URL: https://openreview.net/forum?id=fg2ZFmXFO3
  42. “Adaptive Fourier Neural Operators: Efficient Token Mixers for Transformers” In CoRR abs/2111.13587, 2021 arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.13587
  43. Ben J Gross and Paul J Atzberger “Hydrodynamic flows on curved surfaces: Spectral numerical methods for radial manifold shapes” In Journal of Computational Physics 371 Elsevier, 2018, pp. 663–689 DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109340
  44. Andrew N Pressley “Elementary differential geometry” Springer Science & Business Media, 2010
  45. B Gross and Paul J Atzberger “Spectral numerical exterior calculus methods for differential equations on radial manifolds” In Journal of Scientific Computing 76.1 Springer, 2018, pp. 145–165 DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s10915-017-0617-2
  46. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization” In preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014 URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980
  47. Vyacheslav Ivanovich Lebedev “Quadratures on a sphere” In USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 16.2 Elsevier, 1976, pp. 10–24
  48. “Sgdr: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts” In arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03983, 2016

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel GNP framework that learns geometric properties from manifold data using layered operator mechanisms.
  • The paper demonstrates effective approximation of Laplace-Beltrami operators and reliable solution maps for PDEs on complex geometries.
  • The paper showcases applications in Bayesian inverse problems, enabling precise shape estimation on irregular, non-flat domains.

Advancements in Geometric Neural Operators for Learning from Manifold Data

Introduction to Geometric Neural Operators (GNPs)

Geometric Neural Operators (GNPs) introduce a groundbreaking approach to learning operations that account for geometric contributions in data-driven problems. Unlike traditional models that operate primarily within Euclidean domains, GNPs handle arbitrary-shaped domains, curved surfaces, and other manifold representations efficiently. These operators extend the scope of neural operator frameworks by focusing on the rich geometric structures inherent in many scientific and engineering problems.

Core Contributions and Methodological Setup

GNPs are designed to:

  • Estimate geometric properties such as metrics and curvatures directly from data, particularly from point-cloud representations.
  • Approximate and learn solution maps for differential operators, specifically Laplace-Beltrami (LB) operators on manifold surfaces.
  • Solve complex Bayesian inverse problems for identifying manifold shapes based on observational data.

In terms of architecture, GNPs leverage a combination of lifting procedures, integral and local linear operators, and non-linear activation functions to process input functions and geometric information. The model flexibly alternates between capturing local and global geometric features by stacking multiple operator layers, which incrementally expand the receptive field across the architecture.

Experiments and Results

The paper extensively evaluates GNPs on several tasks:

  1. Learning Geometric Quantities: GNPs succeed in learning first and second fundamental forms of geometry from point-cloud data. This is critical for tasks where understanding the inherent geometry of data is pivotal, such as in shape analysis and physical simulations on complex surfaces.
  2. Solving PDEs on Manifolds: The GNPs are adept at learning solution maps for Laplace-Beltrami-Poisson problems across different manifold geometries. The ability to handle various manifold topologies and shapes underscores the flexibility and robustness of the proposed approach.
  3. Bayesian Inverse Problems: GNPs effectively solve inverse problems to identify manifold shapes based on observations derived from differential operators. Through a combination of geometric deep learning and Bayesian inference, the models predict manifold shapes with high accuracy, demonstrating the potential of GNPs in fields like medical imaging and computer vision where shape estimation is crucial.

Practical Implications and Theoretical Significance

The development of GNPs marks a significant step towards bridging the gap between geometric data representations and machine learning models. Practically, GNPs can impact various applications, including dynamic system modeling on irregular domains, complex material behavior analysis on non-flat surfaces, and advanced image processing tasks involving intricate topological structures.

Theoretically, the integration of geometry into learning operators presents a novel paradigm in the extrapolation capabilities of neural networks. It offers a refined understanding of how deep learning can adapt to manifold-valued data, paving the way for more generalized and theoretically sound models.

Future Prospects and Enhancements

Future work could explore several enhancements to GNPs:

  • Scalability and Efficiency: Optimizing the computational efficiency for high-dimensional manifolds and large datasets remains a challenge.
  • Integration with Other Learning Paradigms: Combining GNPs with reinforcement learning or unsupervised learning could provide deeper insights into many physical and biological processes.
  • Theoretical Bounds and Guarantees: Establishing theoretical performance bounds for GNPs could strengthen their reliability for critical applications in science and engineering.

Conclusion

GNPs represent a transformative approach to incorporating geometric insights into machine learning models. By effectively handling the geometric intricacies of data and operations on manifolds, GNPs open new avenues in modeling, analysis, and inference across diverse fields.