Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
81 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
47 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
22 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
20 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
88 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
79 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
459 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
192 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Electric Vehicles Limit Equitable Access to Essential Services During Blackouts (2404.09998v1)

Published 23 Feb 2024 in physics.soc-ph, cs.NI, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: Electric vehicles (EVs) link mobility and electric power availability, posing a risk of making transportation unavailable during blackouts. We develop a computational framework to quantify the impact of EVs on mobility and access to services and find that existing access issues are exacerbated by EVs. Our results demonstrate that larger batteries reduce mobility constraints but their effectiveness is dependent on the geographic distribution of services and households. We explore the trade-offs between mobility and quality-of-life improvements presented by Vehicle-to-Grid technologies and the feasibility and trade-offs of public charging infrastructure as a solution to access inequalities. Equitable access to essential services (e.g. supermarkets, schools, parks, etc.) is the most important aspect of community resilience and our results show vehicle electrification can hinder access to essential services unless properly incorporated into policy and city-scale decision-making.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (50)
  1. Jenn, A. Emissions benefits of electric vehicles in Uber and Lyft ride-hailing services. \JournalTitleNature Energy 5, 520–525, DOI: 10.1038/s41560-020-0632-7 (2020).
  2. Camilleri, S. F. et al. Air quality, health and equity implications of electrifying heavy-duty vehicles. \JournalTitleNature Sustainability 1–11, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01219-0 (2023).
  3. Liang, X. et al. Air quality and health benefits from fleet electrification in china. \JournalTitleNature Sustainability 2, 962–971, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0398-8 (2019).
  4. Chang, S. Y. et al. Electric vehicle fleet penetration helps address inequalities in air quality and improves environmental justice. \JournalTitleCommunications Earth & Environment 4, 1–15, DOI: 10.1038/s43247-023-00799-1 (2023).
  5. Pan, S. et al. Impacts of the large-scale use of passenger electric vehicles on public health in 30 US. metropolitan areas. \JournalTitleRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 173, 113100, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.113100 (2023).
  6. Economic, environmental and grid-resilience benefits of converting diesel trains to battery-electric. \JournalTitleNature Energy 6, 1017–1025, DOI: 10.1038/s41560-021-00915-5 (2021).
  7. Utilization of electric vehicles for vehicle-to-grid services: Progress and perspectives. \JournalTitleEnergies 15, 589, DOI: 10.3390/en15020589 (2022).
  8. Integration of electric vehicles in smart grid: A review on vehicle to grid technologies and optimization techniques. \JournalTitleRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 53, 720–732, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.012 (2016).
  9. Ren, Y. et al. Hidden delays of climate mitigation benefits in the race for electric vehicle deployment. \JournalTitleNature Communications 14, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38182-5 (2023).
  10. Electrification of light-duty vehicle fleet alone will not meet mitigation targets. \JournalTitleNature Climate Change 10, 1102–1107, DOI: 10.1038/s41558-020-00921-7 (2020).
  11. Trade-off between critical metal requirement and transportation decarbonization in automotive electrification. \JournalTitleNature Communications 14, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37373-4 (2023).
  12. Assessing the feasibility of the inflation reduction act’s ev critical mineral targets. \JournalTitleNature Sustainability 6, 639–643, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01079-8 (2023).
  13. Richter, J. L. A circular economy approach is needed for electric vehicles. \JournalTitleNature Electronics 5, 5–7, DOI: 10.1038/s41928-021-00711-9 (2022).
  14. Zhang, H. et al. Life cycle environmental impact assessment for battery-powered electric vehicles at the global and regional levels. \JournalTitleScientific Reports 13, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35150-3 (2023).
  15. Charging infrastructure access and operation to reduce the grid impacts of deep electric vehicle adoption. \JournalTitleNature Energy 7, 932–945, DOI: 10.1038/s41560-022-01105-7 (2022).
  16. Resilience enhancement strategies for and through electric vehicles. \JournalTitleSustainable Cities and Society 80, 103788, DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103788 (2022).
  17. Resilience of urban public electric vehicle charging infrastructure to flooding. \JournalTitleNature Communications 13, 3213, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30848-w (2022).
  18. Re-thinking procurement incentives for electric vehicles to achieve net-zero emissions, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-022-00862-3 (2022).
  19. Electric vehicles and natural disaster policy implications. \JournalTitleEnergy Policy 112, 437–448, DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.030 (2018).
  20. Almutairi, A. Impact Assessment of Diverse EV Charging Infrastructures on Overall Service Reliability. \JournalTitleSustainability 14, 13295, DOI: 10.3390/su142013295 (2022).
  21. Cano, Z. P. et al. Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets. \JournalTitleNature Energy 3, 279–289, DOI: 10.1038/s41560-018-0108-1 (2018).
  22. Energy efficiency trade-offs in small to large electric vehicles. \JournalTitleEnvironmental Sciences Europe 32, DOI: 10.1186/s12302-020-00307-8 (2020).
  23. Reframing resilience: Equitable access to essential services. \JournalTitleRisk Analysis 40, 1538–1553, DOI: 10.1111/risa.13492 (2020).
  24. International Energy Agency. Global CO2 emissions by sector, 2019-2022. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-co2-emissions-by-sector-2019-2022.
  25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2021 (2023).
  26. U.S. Energy Information Administration. U.S. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions (2022).
  27. The effect of sustainable mobility transition policies on cumulative urban transport emissions and energy demand. \JournalTitleNature Communications 14, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37728-x (2023).
  28. Simulating the value of electric-vehicle–grid integration using a behaviourally realistic model. \JournalTitleNature Energy 3, 132–139, DOI: 10.1038/s41560-017-0077-9 (2018).
  29. International Energy Agency. Net Zero by 2050 (2021).
  30. International Energy Agency. World Energy outlook (2022).
  31. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Value framework for sustainable charging infrastructure (2021).
  32. Electric Vehicle Database. https://ev-database.org/. Accessed: 2023-03-30.
  33. Macmillan, M. et al. Shedding light on the economic costs of long-duration power outages: A review of resilience assessment methods and strategies. \JournalTitleEnergy Research & Social Science 99, 103055, DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103055 (2023).
  34. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Hurricane ida caused at least 1.2 million electricity customers to lose power. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=49556. Accessed: 2024-02-06.
  35. Measuring inequalities in urban systems: An approach for evaluating the distribution of amenities and burdens. \JournalTitleComputers, Environment and Urban Systems 86, 101590, DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101590 (2021).
  36. Inequality and urban density: Socio-economic drivers of uneven densification in cape town. \JournalTitleEnvironment and Urbanization ASIA 12, S107–S126, DOI: 10.1177/0975425321998026 (2021).
  37. The value of car ownership and use in the united states. \JournalTitleNature Sustainability 4, 769–774, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-021-00731-5 (2021).
  38. Grengs, J. Job accessibility and the modal mismatch in detroit. \JournalTitleJournal of Transport Geography 18, 42–54, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.01.012 (2010).
  39. Commute mode diversity and income inequality: an inter-urban analysis of 148 midsize us cities. \JournalTitleLocal Environment 23, 54–76, DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2017.1385001 (2018).
  40. Car ownership, travel and land use: a comparison of the us and great britain. \JournalTitleTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 40, 106–124, DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2005.03.002 (2006).
  41. Willingness to Use Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) - 2021 Pilot Survey. https://coloradosmart.city/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/V2X_PilotSurveyCU_2021.pdf (2021). Accessed: 2024-02-13.
  42. U.S. Internal Revenuew Service. Inflation reduction act 2022. https://www.irs.gov/inflation-reduction-act-of-2022. Accessed: 2023-12-20.
  43. Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles. \JournalTitleNature Climate Change 5, 329–332, DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2564 (2015).
  44. Cutter, S. L. et al. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. \JournalTitleGlobal Environmental Change 18, 598–606, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013 (2008).
  45. Rose, A. Defining and measuring economic resilience to disasters. \JournalTitleDisaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 13, 307–314 (2004).
  46. Chakraborty, P. et al. Addressing the range anxiety of battery electric vehicles with charging en route. \JournalTitleScientific Reports 12, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08942-2 (2022).
  47. Project OSRM: Open Source Routing Machine. https://project-osrm.org/. Accessed: 2023-12-22.
  48. Health risk, inequality indexes, and environmental justice. \JournalTitleRisk Analysis 40, 2661–2674, DOI: 10.1111/risa.13562 (2020).
  49. Atkinson, A. B. On the measurement of inequality. \JournalTitleJournal of Economic Theory 2, 244–263, DOI: 10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6 (1970).
  50. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Annual household site end-use consumption in the United States—totals and averages. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2020/c&e/pdf/ce3.1.pdf (2020). Accessed: 2024-02-13.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube