Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
121 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
9 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Glitch Tokens in Large Language Models: Categorization Taxonomy and Effective Detection (2404.09894v3)

Published 15 Apr 2024 in cs.CL and cs.SE

Abstract: With the expanding application of LLMs in various domains, it becomes imperative to comprehensively investigate their unforeseen behaviors and consequent outcomes. In this study, we introduce and systematically explore the phenomenon of "glitch tokens", which are anomalous tokens produced by established tokenizers and could potentially compromise the models' quality of response. Specifically, we experiment on seven top popular LLMs utilizing three distinct tokenizers and involving a totally of 182,517 tokens. We present categorizations of the identified glitch tokens and symptoms exhibited by LLMs when interacting with glitch tokens. Based on our observation that glitch tokens tend to cluster in the embedding space, we propose GlitchHunter, a novel iterative clustering-based technique, for efficient glitch token detection. The evaluation shows that our approach notably outperforms three baseline methods on eight open-source LLMs. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first comprehensive study on glitch tokens. Our new detection further provides valuable insights into mitigating tokenization-related errors in LLMs.

Citations (15)

Summary

  • The paper's main contribution is the development of a taxonomy for glitch tokens and the introduction of GlitchHunter, a method achieving up to 99.44% precision.
  • It details a categorization of glitch tokens into five types along with five error symptoms, clarifying tokenization anomalies in LLMs.
  • The study leverages clustering in the token embedding space to improve anomaly detection and enhance reliability across diverse LLM architectures.

Overview of "Glitch Tokens in LLMs: Categorization Taxonomy and Effective Detection"

LLMs have significantly advanced natural language processing, driving innovation in numerous applications. Despite their prowess, these models occasionally exhibit unexpected behaviors attributed to "glitch tokens." The paper entitled "Glitch Tokens in LLMs: Categorization Taxonomy and Effective Detection" embarks on a comprehensive examination of this phenomenon, proposing a novel detection methodology to enhance the reliability and efficiency of LLMs.

Major Findings

The paper begins with a systematic exploration of glitch tokens, which are anomalous outputs generated when certain tokens are fed into LLMs. The research categorizes these tokens into five distinct types—Word Token, Letter Token, Character Token, Letter-Character Token, and Special Token—based on the nature of their construction and their effects on model behavior. Additionally, the authors delineate five symptoms indicative of glitch tokens: Spelling Mistakes, Incapacity, Hallucinatory Completion, Question Repetition, and Random Characters. These symptoms reflect the varied erroneous outputs that can emerge, from simply misspelled words to entirely irrelevant or nonsensical responses.

A significant emphasis is placed on understanding the implications of glitch tokens which frequently appear in real-world datasets. This prevalence suggests that these aberrations are not mere anomalies but rather prevalent issues that could impact LLM applications broadly. For instance, in real-world scenarios such as ChatBots, unexpected toxic outputs, as mentioned in the paper, can have negative consequences.

Methodology: GlitchHunter

To address the challenges posed by glitch tokens, the paper introduces GlitchHunter, an innovative detection method that effectively harnesses clustering within the model's embedding space. The research presents the Token Embedding Graph (TEG), capturing token interrelations and leveraging the Leiden algorithm for optimal clustering of potential glitch tokens. The iterative process refines clusters, reducing the search space and enhancing detection precision. Notably, GlitchHunter demonstrates a substantial improvement over baseline methods, achieving up to 99.44% precision and significant recall rates across eight tested LLMs, including models with diverse architectures and parameters.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this paper are twofold: practical enhancements in LLM robustness and theoretical contributions to understanding tokenization errors. By systematically addressing glitch tokens, this research outlines a path for improving response accuracy and trustworthiness in scenarios where LLMs are deployed. Furthermore, the clustering strategies employed by GlitchHunter indicate a promising direction for future research, encouraging the exploration of novel glitch token attributes and the development of mitigation strategies to enhance LLM resilience.

Conclusion

This paper provides a detailed discourse on the persistent issue of glitch tokens in LLMs, backed by empirical research and a novel detection approach. GlitchHunter, with its high precision and recall, stands out as an effective tool for alleviating the adverse effects posed by these tokens. As LLMs continue to evolve, research initiatives such as these are pivotal, guiding advancements that seek to balance model sophistication with output reliability and user safety. Future endeavors should aim to deepen insights into glitch phenomena, incorporating broader tokenization strategies and defensive measures across LLM applications.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com