Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Interest Maximization in Social Networks (2404.08236v2)

Published 12 Apr 2024 in cs.SI

Abstract: Nowadays, organizations use viral marketing strategies to promote their products through social networks. It is expensive to directly send the product promotional information to all the users in the network. In this context, Kempe et al. \cite{kempe2003maximizing} introduced the Influence Maximization (IM) problem, which identifies $k$ most influential nodes (spreader nodes), such that the maximum number of people in the network adopts the promotional message. Many variants of the IM problem have been studied in the literature, namely, Perfect Evangelising Set (PES), Perfect Awareness Problem (PAP), etc. In this work, we propose a maximization version of PAP called the \IM{} problem. Different people have different levels of interest in a particular product. This is modeled by assigning an interest value to each node in the network. Then, the problem is to select $k$ initial spreaders such that the sum of the interest values of the people (nodes) who become aware of the message is maximized. We study the \IM{} problem under two popular diffusion models: the Linear Threshold Model (LTM) and the Independent Cascade Model (ICM). We show that the \IM{} problem is NP-Hard under LTM. We give linear programming formulation for the problem under LTM. We propose four heuristic algorithms for the \IM{} problem: \LBE{} (\LB{}), Maximum Degree First Heuristic (\MD{}), \PBE{} (\PB{}), and Maximum Profit Based Greedy Heuristic (\MP{}). Extensive experimentation has been carried out on many real-world benchmark data sets for both diffusion models. The results show that among the proposed heuristics, \MP{} performs better in maximizing the interest value.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. Opinion maximization in signed social networks using centrality measures and clustering techniques. In Distributed Computing and Intelligent Technology: 19th International Conference, ICDCIT 2023, Bhubaneswar, India, January 18–22, 2023, Proceedings, pages 125–140. Springer, 2023.
  2. The weighted k-center problem in trees for fixed k. Theoretical Computer Science, 906:64–75, 2022. ISSN 0304-3975. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2022.01.005.
  3. Ning Chen. On the approximability of influence in social networks. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 23(3):1400–1415, 2009.
  4. Evangelism in social networks: Algorithms and complexity. Networks, 71(4):346–357, 2018.
  5. Active influence spreading in social networks. Theoretical Computer Science, 764:15–29, 2019.
  6. Faster heuristics for graph burning. Applied Intelligence, pages 1–11, 2022.
  7. Centrality measures based heuristics for perfect awareness problem in social networks. In Raghava Morusupalli, Teja Santosh Dandibhotla, Vani Vathsala Atluri, David Windridge, Pawan Lingras, and Venkateswara Rao Komati, editors, Multi-disciplinary Trends in Artificial Intelligence, pages 91–100, Cham, 2023. Springer Nature Switzerland.
  8. Opinion maximization in social networks, pages 387–395. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2013. doi: 10.1137/1.9781611972832.43.
  9. Times Of India. For the first time, india has more rural net users than urban, 2020. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/for-the-first-time-india-has-more-rural-net-users-than-urban/articleshow/75566025.cms.
  10. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 137–146, 2003.
  11. Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. In ICALP, volume 5, pages 1127–1138. Springer, 2005.
  12. SNAP Datasets: Stanford large network dataset collection. http://snap.stanford.edu/data, June 2014.
  13. Targeted influence maximization in competitive social networks. Information Sciences, 619:390–405, 2023.
  14. A centrality based genetic algorithm for the graph burning problem. Applied Soft Computing, 144:110493, 2023. ISSN 1568-4946. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110493.
  15. Mark Newman. Network data. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/netdata/, 2015.
  16. Effective heuristics for the perfect awareness problem. Procedia Computer Science, 195:489–498, 2021.
  17. Target set selection in social networks with tiered influence and activation thresholds. Journal of combinatorial optimization, 45:117, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-023-01023-8.
  18. Social computing data repository. http://datasets.syr.edu/pages/datasets.html, 2009.
  19. The network data repository with interactive graph analytics and visualization. In AAAI, 2015. https://networkrepository.com.
  20. Containment of rumor spread in complex social networks. Information Sciences, 506:113–130, 2020.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.