Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

SparseAD: Sparse Query-Centric Paradigm for Efficient End-to-End Autonomous Driving (2404.06892v1)

Published 10 Apr 2024 in cs.CV

Abstract: End-to-End paradigms use a unified framework to implement multi-tasks in an autonomous driving system. Despite simplicity and clarity, the performance of end-to-end autonomous driving methods on sub-tasks is still far behind the single-task methods. Meanwhile, the widely used dense BEV features in previous end-to-end methods make it costly to extend to more modalities or tasks. In this paper, we propose a Sparse query-centric paradigm for end-to-end Autonomous Driving (SparseAD), where the sparse queries completely represent the whole driving scenario across space, time and tasks without any dense BEV representation. Concretely, we design a unified sparse architecture for perception tasks including detection, tracking, and online mapping. Moreover, we revisit motion prediction and planning, and devise a more justifiable motion planner framework. On the challenging nuScenes dataset, SparseAD achieves SOTA full-task performance among end-to-end methods and significantly narrows the performance gap between end-to-end paradigms and single-task methods. Codes will be released soon.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (92)
  1. Pnpnet: End-to-end perception and prediction with tracking in the loop. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11553–11562, 2020.
  2. Perceive, predict, and plan: Safe motion planning through interpretable semantic representations. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXIII 16, pages 414–430. Springer, 2020.
  3. End-to-end driving via conditional imitation learning. In 2018 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pages 4693–4700. IEEE, 2018.
  4. Exploring the limitations of behavior cloning for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 9329–9338, 2019.
  5. Trajectory-guided control prediction for end-to-end autonomous driving: A simple yet strong baseline. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:6119–6132, 2022.
  6. End-to-end urban driving by imitating a reinforcement learning coach. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 15222–15232, 2021.
  7. Planning-oriented autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17853–17862, 2023.
  8. Fusionad: Multi-modality fusion for prediction and planning tasks of autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01006, 2023.
  9. Petr: Position embedding transformation for multi-view 3d object detection. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 531–548. Springer, 2022.
  10. Exploring object-centric temporal modeling for efficient multi-view 3d object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11926, 2023.
  11. Standing between past and future: Spatio-temporal modeling for multi-camera 3d multi-object tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17928–17938, 2023.
  12. Vad: Vectorized scene representation for efficient autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12077, 2023.
  13. Fully sparse transformer 3d detector for lidar point cloud. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023.
  14. Far3d: Expanding the horizon for surround-view 3d object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.09616, 2023.
  15. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  16. A convnet for the 2020s. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11976–11986, 2022.
  17. Eva: Exploring the limits of masked visual representation learning at scale. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19358–19369, 2023.
  18. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  19. nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11621–11631, 2020.
  20. Center-based 3d object detection and tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11784–11793, 2021.
  21. Focal sparse convolutional networks for 3d object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5428–5437, 2022.
  22. Largekernel3d: Scaling up kernels in 3d sparse cnns. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 13488–13498, 2023.
  23. Voxelnext: Fully sparse voxelnet for 3d object detection and tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 21674–21683, 2023.
  24. Bevdet: High-performance multi-camera 3d object detection in bird-eye-view. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11790, 2021.
  25. Bevformer: Learning bird’s-eye-view representation from multi-camera images via spatiotemporal transformers. In European conference on computer vision, pages 1–18. Springer, 2022.
  26. Bevdepth: Acquisition of reliable depth for multi-view 3d object detection. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pages 1477–1485, 2023.
  27. Transfusion: Robust lidar-camera fusion for 3d object detection with transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1090–1099, 2022.
  28. Bevfusion: Multi-task multi-sensor fusion with unified bird’s-eye view representation. In 2023 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pages 2774–2781. IEEE, 2023.
  29. Cross modal transformer: Towards fast and robust 3d object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 18268–18278, 2023.
  30. Lift, splat, shoot: Encoding images from arbitrary camera rigs by implicitly unprojecting to 3d. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XIV 16, pages 194–210. Springer, 2020.
  31. Bevformer v2: Adapting modern image backbones to bird’s-eye-view recognition via perspective supervision. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17830–17839, 2023.
  32. Exploring recurrent long-term temporal fusion for multi-view 3d perception. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.05970, 2023.
  33. Bevstereo: Enhancing depth estimation in multi-view 3d object detection with temporal stereo. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pages 1486–1494, 2023.
  34. Detr3d: 3d object detection from multi-view images via 3d-to-2d queries. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 180–191. PMLR, 2022.
  35. Petrv2: A unified framework for 3d perception from multi-camera images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3262–3272, 2023.
  36. Focal-petr: Embracing foreground for efficient multi-camera 3d object detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2023.
  37. Sparse4d: Multi-view 3d object detection with sparse spatial-temporal fusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10581, 2022.
  38. Sparse4d v2: Recurrent temporal fusion with sparse model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14018, 2023.
  39. Sparse4d v3: Advancing end-to-end 3d detection and tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11722, 2023.
  40. 3d multi-object tracking: A baseline and new evaluation metrics. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 10359–10366. IEEE, 2020.
  41. Global correlation network: End-to-end joint multi-object detection and tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.12511, 2021.
  42. Motr: End-to-end multiple-object tracking with transformer. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 659–675. Springer, 2022.
  43. Motrv2: Bootstrapping end-to-end multi-object tracking by pretrained object detectors. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 22056–22065, 2023.
  44. Motrv3: Release-fetch supervision for end-to-end multi-object tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14298, 2023.
  45. Transtrack: Multiple object tracking with transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.15460, 2020.
  46. Simpletrack: Understanding and rethinking 3d multi-object tracking. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 680–696. Springer, 2022.
  47. Trackformer: Multi-object tracking with transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8844–8854, 2022.
  48. Mutr3d: A multi-camera tracking framework via 3d-to-2d queries. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4537–4546, 2022.
  49. Hdmapnet: An online hd map construction and evaluation framework. In 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 4628–4634. IEEE, 2022.
  50. Vectormapnet: End-to-end vectorized hd map learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 22352–22369. PMLR, 2023.
  51. End-to-end vectorized hd-map construction with piecewise bezier curve. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 13218–13228, 2023.
  52. Pivotnet: Vectorized pivot learning for end-to-end hd map construction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3672–3682, 2023.
  53. Streammapnet: Streaming mapping network for vectorized online hd map construction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 7356–7365, 2024.
  54. Multipath: Multiple probabilistic anchor trajectory hypotheses for behavior prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.05449, 2019.
  55. Covernet: Multimodal behavior prediction using trajectory sets. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 14074–14083, 2020.
  56. Vectornet: Encoding hd maps and agent dynamics from vectorized representation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11525–11533, 2020.
  57. Tnt: Target-driven trajectory prediction. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 895–904. PMLR, 2021.
  58. Multipath++: Efficient information fusion and trajectory aggregation for behavior prediction. In 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 7814–7821. IEEE, 2022.
  59. Hivt: Hierarchical vector transformer for multi-agent motion prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8823–8833, 2022.
  60. Query-centric trajectory prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17863–17873, 2023.
  61. Motion transformer with global intention localization and local movement refinement. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:6531–6543, 2022.
  62. Mtr++: Multi-agent motion prediction with symmetric scene modeling and guided intention querying. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024.
  63. Vip3d: End-to-end visual trajectory prediction via 3d agent queries. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5496–5506, 2023.
  64. Motion planning for autonomous vehicles based on sequential optimization. Vehicles, 4(2):344–374, 2022.
  65. Path planning optimization of intelligent vehicle based on improved genetic and ant colony hybrid algorithm. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10:905983, 2022.
  66. Road-model-based and graph-structure-based hierarchical path-planning approach for autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 228(8):909–928, 2014.
  67. Path planning algorithms in the autonomous driving system: A comprehensive review. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, page 104630, 2024.
  68. Efficient sampling-based motion planning for on-road autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(4):1961–1976, 2015.
  69. Adaptive sampling-based motion planning with a non-conservatively defensive strategy for autonomous driving. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(2):15632–15638, 2020.
  70. Sampling-based motion planning: A comparative review. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 7, 2023.
  71. Learning to drive in a day. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 8248–8254. IEEE, 2019.
  72. Szilárd Aradi. Survey of deep reinforcement learning for motion planning of autonomous vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(2):740–759, 2020.
  73. Drl-gat-sa: Deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving planning based on graph attention networks and simplex architecture. Journal of Systems Architecture, 126:102505, 2022.
  74. Deformable detr: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.04159, 2020.
  75. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  76. Focal loss for dense object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 2980–2988, 2017.
  77. Centermask: Real-time anchor-free instance segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 13906–13915, 2020.
  78. Deft: Detection embeddings for tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.02267, 2021.
  79. Time will tell: New outlooks and a baseline for temporal multi-view 3d object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02443, 2022.
  80. Monocular quasi-dense 3d object tracking. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(2):1992–2008, 2022.
  81. Triplettrack: 3d object tracking using triplet embeddings and lstm. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4500–4510, 2022.
  82. Cc-3dt: Panoramic 3d object tracking via cross-camera fusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.01247, 2022.
  83. Quality matters: Embracing quality clues for robust 3d multi-object tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.10976, 2022.
  84. Srcn3d: Sparse r-cnn 3d surround-view camera object detection and tracking for autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14451, 2022.
  85. Maptr: Structured modeling and learning for online vectorized hd map construction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.14437, 2022.
  86. Differentiable raycasting for self-supervised occupancy forecasting. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 353–369. Springer, 2022.
  87. St-p3: End-to-end vision-based autonomous driving via spatial-temporal feature learning. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 533–549. Springer, 2022.
  88. Is ego status all you need for open-loop end-to-end autonomous driving? arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.03031, 2023.
  89. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017.
  90. Sgdr: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03983, 2016.
  91. Dort: Modeling dynamic objects in recurrent for multi-camera 3d object detection and tracking. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 3749–3765. PMLR, 2023.
  92. End-to-end 3d tracking with decoupled queries. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 18302–18311, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (18)
  1. Diankun Zhang (4 papers)
  2. Guoan Wang (13 papers)
  3. Runwen Zhu (1 paper)
  4. Jianbo Zhao (12 papers)
  5. Xiwu Chen (8 papers)
  6. Siyu Zhang (32 papers)
  7. Jiahao Gong (9 papers)
  8. Qibin Zhou (7 papers)
  9. Wenyuan Zhang (30 papers)
  10. Ningzi Wang (1 paper)
  11. Feiyang Tan (5 papers)
  12. Hangning Zhou (11 papers)
  13. Ziyao Xu (22 papers)
  14. Haotian Yao (9 papers)
  15. Chi Zhang (567 papers)
  16. Xiaojun Liu (39 papers)
  17. Xiaoguang Di (10 papers)
  18. Bin Li (514 papers)
Citations (3)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets