Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Spiral Scanning and Self-Supervised Image Reconstruction Enable Ultra-Sparse Sampling Multispectral Photoacoustic Tomography (2404.06695v1)

Published 10 Apr 2024 in eess.IV and physics.med-ph

Abstract: Multispectral photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is an imaging modality that utilizes the photoacoustic effect to achieve non-invasive and high-contrast imaging of internal tissues. However, the hardware cost and computational demand of a multispectral PAT system consisting of up to thousands of detectors are huge. To address this challenge, we propose an ultra-sparse spiral sampling strategy for multispectral PAT, which we named U3S-PAT. Our strategy employs a sparse ring-shaped transducer that, when switching excitation wavelengths, simultaneously rotates and translates. This creates a spiral scanning pattern with multispectral angle-interlaced sampling. To solve the highly ill-conditioned image reconstruction problem, we propose a self-supervised learning method that is able to introduce structural information shared during spiral scanning. We simulate the proposed U3S-PAT method on a commercial PAT system and conduct in vivo animal experiments to verify its performance. The results show that even with a sparse sampling rate as low as 1/30, our U3S-PAT strategy achieves similar reconstruction and spectral unmixing accuracy as non-spiral dense sampling. Given its ability to dramatically reduce the time required for three-dimensional multispectral scanning, our U3S-PAT strategy has the potential to perform volumetric molecular imaging of dynamic biological activities.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. L. V. Wang and S. Hu, “Photoacoustic Tomography: in vivo Imaging from Organelles to Organs,” Science, vol. 335, no. 6075, pp. 1458–1462, Mar. 2012.
  2. L. V. Wang and J. Yao, “A practical guide to photoacoustic tomography in the life sciences,” Nat. Methods, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 627–638, Jul. 2016.
  3. P. K. Upputuri and M. Pramanik, “Recent advances toward preclinical and clinical translation of photoacoustic tomography: a review,” J. Biomed. Opt., vol. 22, no. 4, p. 041006, Nov. 2016.
  4. P. K. Upputuri and M. Pramanik, “Dynamic in vivo imaging of small animal brain using pulsed laser diode-based photoacoustic tomography system,” J. Biomed. Opt., vol. 22, no. 09, p. 1, Sep. 2017.
  5. X. Luís Deán-Ben, N. C. Deliolanis, V. Ntziachristos, and D. Razansky, “Fast unmixing of multispectral optoacoustic data with vertex component analysis,” Opt. Lasers Eng., vol. 58, pp. 119–125, Jul. 2014.
  6. J. Glatz, N. C. Deliolanis, A. Buehler, D. Razansky, and V. Ntziachristos, “Blind source unmixing in multi-spectral optoacoustic tomography,” Opt. Express, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 3175, Feb. 2011.
  7. S. Tzoumas, N. Deliolanis, S. Morscher, and V. Ntziachristos, “Unmixing Molecular Agents From Absorbing Tissue in Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 48–60, Jan. 2014.
  8. L. Yao and H. Jiang, “Photoacoustic image reconstruction from few-detector and limited-angle data,” Biomed. Opt. Express, vol. 2, no. 9, p. 2649, Aug. 2011.
  9. H. Yu and G. Wang, “Compressed sensing based interior tomography,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 54, no. 13, pp. 4341–4341, Jun. 2009.
  10. G.-H. Chen, J. Tang, and S. Leng, “Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): A method to accurately reconstruct dynamic CT images from highly undersampled projection data sets,” Med. Phys., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 660–663, Jan. 2008.
  11. E. Y. Sidky and X. Pan, “Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 53, no. 17, pp. 4777–4807, Aug. 2008.
  12. S. Ravishankar and Y. Bresler, “MR Image Reconstruction From Highly Undersampled k-Space Data by Dictionary Learning,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1028–1041, May 2011.
  13. N. Davoudi, X. L. Deán-Ben, and D. Razansky, “Deep learning optoacoustic tomography with sparse data,” Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 453–460, Sep. 2019.
  14. C. B. Ahn, J. H. Kim, and Z. H. Cho, “High-speed spiral-scan echo planar NMR imaging-I,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2–7, 1986.
  15. E. C. Ford, G. S. Mageras, E. Yorke, and C. C. Ling, “Respiration-correlated spiral CT: A method of measuring respiratory-induced anatomic motion for radiation treatment planning,” Med. Phys., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 88–97, Dec. 2002.
  16. T. Fuchs, M. Kachelrieß, and W. A. Kalender, “Technical advances in multi–slice spiral CT,” Eur. J. Radiol., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 69–73, Nov. 2000.
  17. X. L. Deán-Ben, T. F. Fehm, S. J. Ford, S. Gottschalk, and D. Razansky, “Spiral volumetric optoacoustic tomography visualizes multi-scale dynamics in mice,” Light Sci. Appl., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. e16247–e16247, Nov. 2016.
  18. A. Ron, X. L. Deán-Ben, J. Reber, V. Ntziachristos, and D. Razansky, “Characterization of Brown Adipose Tissue in a Diabetic Mouse Model with Spiral Volumetric Optoacoustic Tomography,” Mol. Imag. Biol., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 620–625, Nov. 2018.
  19. S. K. Kalva, X. L. Deán-Ben, M. Reiss, and D. Razansky, “Head-to-tail imaging of mice with spiral volumetric optoacoustic tomography,” Photoacoustics, vol. 30, p. 100480, Apr. 2023.
  20. B. Mildenhall, P. P. Srinivasan, M. Tancik, J. T. Barron, R. Ramamoorthi, and R. Ng, “NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis,” in Proc. Europ. Conf. Comp. Visi(ECCV), pp. 405–421, 2020.
  21. V. Sitzmann, J. N. P. Martel, A. W. Bergman, D. B. Lindell, and G. Wetzstein, “Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functions,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf.Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), Jun. 2020.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com