Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Smooth Actual EIRP Control for EMF Compliance with Minimum Traffic Guarantees (2404.06624v5)

Published 9 Apr 2024 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: To mitigate Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) human exposure from base stations, international standards bodies define EMF emission requirements that can be translated into limits on the "actual" Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP), i.e., averaged over a sliding time window. We aim to enable base stations to adhere to these constraints while mitigating any impact on user performance. Specifically, our objectives are to: i) ensure EMF exposure compliance using actual EIRP control when implementing the "actual maximum approach" described in IEC 62232:2022, ii) guarantee a minimum EIRP level, and iii) prevent resource shortages at all times. We first investigate exact and conservative algorithms, with linear and constant complexity, respectively, to compute the maximum allowed EIRP consumption under constraints i) and ii), referred to as EIRP "budget". Subsequently, we design a control method based on Drift-Plus-Penalty theory that preemptively curbs EIRP consumption only when needed to avoid future resource shortages.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (10)
  1. Int. Commission. on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), “Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz),” Health physics, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 483–524, 2020.
  2. IEEE Std C95.1-2019, “IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz,” (Revision of IEEE Std C95. 1-2005/Incorporates IEEE Std C95. 1-2019/Cor 1-2019), pp. 1–312, 2019.
  3. Int. Electrotechnical Commission, “Determination of RF field strength, power density and SAR in the vicinity of base stations for the purpose of evaluating human exposure,” IEC 62232:2022, 2022.
  4. P. Baracca, A. Weber, T. Wild, and C. Grangeat, “A statistical approach for RF exposure compliance boundary assessment in massive MIMO systems,” in WSA 2018; 22nd International ITG Workshop on Smart Antennas.   VDE, 2018, pp. 1–6.
  5. M. Rybakowski, K. Bechta, C. Grangeat, and P. Kabacik, “Impact of Beamforming Algorithms on the Actual RF EMF Exposure From Massive MIMO Base Stations,” IEEE Access, 2023.
  6. C. Törnevik, T. Wigren, S. Guo, and K. Huisman, “Time averaged power control of a 4G or a 5G radio base station for RF EMF compliance,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 211 937–211 950, 2020.
  7. D. Ying, D. J. Love, and B. M. Hochwald, “Closed-loop precoding and capacity analysis for multiple-antenna wireless systems with user radiation exposure constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 5859–5870, 2015.
  8. T. Wigren, D. Colombi, B. Thors, and J.-E. Berg, “Implication of RF EMF exposure limitations on 5G data rates above 6 GHz,” in 2015 IEEE 82nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2015-Fall).   IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–5.
  9. J. Mo and J. Walrand, “Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on networking, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 556–567, 2000.
  10. M. J. Neely, “Stochastic network optimization with application to communication and queueing systems,” Synthesis Lectures on Communication Networks, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–211, 2010.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.