Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Pro
GPT-5
GPT-4o
DeepSeek R1 via Azure
2000 character limit reached

Efficient quantum Gibbs samplers with Kubo--Martin--Schwinger detailed balance condition (2404.05998v5)

Published 9 Apr 2024 in quant-ph

Abstract: Lindblad dynamics and other open-system dynamics provide a promising path towards efficient Gibbs sampling on quantum computers. In these proposals, the Lindbladian is obtained via an algorithmic construction akin to designing an artificial thermostat in classical Monte Carlo or molecular dynamics methods, rather than treated as an approximation to weakly coupled system-bath unitary dynamics. Recently, Chen, Kastoryano, and Gily\'en (arXiv:2311.09207) introduced the first efficiently implementable Lindbladian satisfying the Kubo--Martin--Schwinger (KMS) detailed balance condition, which ensures that the Gibbs state is a fixed point of the dynamics and is applicable to non-commuting Hamiltonians. This Gibbs sampler uses a continuously parameterized set of jump operators, and the energy resolution required for implementing each jump operator depends only logarithmically on the precision and the mixing time. In this work, we build upon the structural characterization of KMS detailed balanced Lindbladians by Fagnola and Umanit`a, and develop a family of efficient quantum Gibbs samplers using a finite set of jump operators (the number can be as few as one), \re{akin to the classical Markov chain-based sampling algorithm. Compared to the existing works, our quantum Gibbs samplers have a comparable quantum simulation cost but with greater design flexibility and a much simpler implementation and error analysis.} Moreover, it encompasses the construction of Chen, Kastoryano, and Gily\'en as a special instance.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (55)
  1. Complete positivity and self-adjointness. Linear Algebra Appl., 611:389–439, 2021.
  2. Quantum algorithm for linear non-unitary dynamics with near-optimal dependence on all parameters. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.03916, 2023.
  3. The power of quantum systems on a line. Comm. Math. Phys., 287(1):41–65, 2009.
  4. Global Lqsuperscript𝐿𝑞L^{q}italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-gevrey functions and their applications. J. Geom. Anal., 27:1874–1913, 2017.
  5. Robert Alicki. On the detailed balance condition for non-hamiltonian systems. Rep. Math. Phys., 10(2):249–258, 1976.
  6. Exponential improvement in precision for simulating sparse hamiltonians. In STOC 2014, pages 283–292, 2014.
  7. Rapid thermalization of spin chain commuting Hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. Lett., 130(6):060401, 2023.
  8. High-Temperature Gibbs States are Unentangled and Efficiently Preparable. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16850, 2024.
  9. Khristo N. Boyadzhiev. Derivative polynomials for tanh, tan, sech and sec in explicit form. Fibonacci Quart., page 291–303, 2007.
  10. The theory of open quantum systems. OUP Oxford, 2002.
  11. Properties of the eigenvectors of persymmetric matrices with applications to communication theory. IEEE T COMMUN, 24(8):804–809, 1976.
  12. Fast Thermalization from the Eigenstate Thermalization Hypothesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.07646, 2021.
  13. Quantum thermal state preparation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18224, 2023.
  14. An efficient and exact noncommutative quantum Gibbs sampler. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09207, 2023.
  15. Explicit quantum circuits for block encodings of certain sparse matrices. SIAM J. Matrix Anal.Appl., 45(1):801–827, 2024.
  16. Gradient flow and entropy inequalities for quantum markov semigroups with detailed balance. J. Funct. Anal., 273(5):1810–1869, 2017.
  17. Non-commutative calculus, optimal transport and functional inequalities in dissipative quantum systems. J. Stat. Phys., 178(2):319–378, 2020.
  18. L. Comtet. Advanced Combinatorics: The Art of Finite and Infinite Expansions. Springer Netherlands, 1974.
  19. Quantum algorithms for Gibbs sampling and hitting-time estimation. Quantum Inf. Comput., 17(1-2):41–64, 2017.
  20. Toby S. Cubitt. Dissipative ground state preparation and the dissipative quantum eigensolver. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11962, 2023.
  21. Hamiltonian simulation using linear combinations of unitary operations. Quantum Inf. Comput., 12:901–924, 2012.
  22. Efficient quantum algorithms for simulating Lindblad evolution. In ICALP 2017, 2017.
  23. E. Brian Davies. Markovian master equations. Commun. Math. Phys., 39:91–110, 1974.
  24. E. Brian Davies. Quantum theory of open systems. Academic Press, 1976.
  25. E. Brian Davies. Generators of dynamical semigroups. J. Funct. Anal., 34(3):421–432, 1979.
  26. Simulating open quantum systems using hamiltonian simulations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15533, 2024.
  27. Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications. Academic Press, 2002.
  28. Generators of detailed balance quantum Markov semigroups. Infin. Dimens. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. Top., 10(03):335–363, 2007.
  29. Generators of KMS symmetric Markov semigroups on symmetry and quantum detailed balance. Commun. Math. Phys., 298(2):523–547, 2010.
  30. Completely positive dynamical semigroups of n𝑛nitalic_n-level systems. J. Math. Phys., 17:821–825, 1976.
  31. Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics. In STOC 2019, pages 193–204, 2019.
  32. Global Lqsuperscript𝐿𝑞L^{q}italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Gevrey Functions, Paley-Weiner Theorems, and the FBI Transform. Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 68(3):pp. 967–1002, 2019.
  33. Quantum Gibbs samplers: The commuting case. Commun. Math. Phys., 344:915–957, 2016.
  34. Quantum detailed balance and KMS condition. Commun. Math. Phys., 57(2):97–110, 1977.
  35. Classical and quantum computation. Number 47 in Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Soc., 2002.
  36. Quantum logarithmic Sobolev inequalities and rapid mixing. J. Math. Phys., 54(5):1–34, 2013.
  37. Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization. Quantum, 3:163, 2019.
  38. Daniel A. Lidar. Lecture notes on the theory of open quantum systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00967, 2019.
  39. Goran Lindblad. On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups. Commun. Math. Phys., 48:119–130, 1976.
  40. Simulating Markovian Open Quantum Systems Using Higher-Order Series Expansion. In ICALP 2023, pages 87:1–87:20, 2023.
  41. Completely positive master equation for arbitrary driving and small level spacing. Quantum, 4(1):1–62, 2020.
  42. Block-encoding dense and full-rank kernels using hierarchical matrices: applications in quantum numerical linear algebra. Quantum, 6:876, 12 2022.
  43. Mark A. Pinsky. Introduction to Fourier Analysis and Wavelets. Graduate studies in mathematics. American Mathematical Society, 2008.
  44. Preparing ground states of quantum many-body systems on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102(13):130503, 2009.
  45. Efficient thermalization and universal quantum computing with quantum Gibbs samplers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12691, 2024.
  46. Thermal state preparation via rounding promises. Quantum, 7:1132, 2023.
  47. Block-encoding structured matrices for data input in quantum computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.10949, 2023.
  48. Preparing thermal states on noiseless and noisy programmable quantum processors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.14688, 2023.
  49. The χ2superscript𝜒2\chi^{2}italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-divergence and mixing times of quantum Markov processes. J. Math. Phys., 51(12), 2010.
  50. Quantum Metropolis sampling. Nature, 471(7336):87–90, 2011.
  51. Quantum SDP-solvers: Better upper and lower bounds. In FOCS 2017, pages 403–414. IEEE, 2017.
  52. Michael M. Wolf. Quantum channels & operations: guided tour. Lecture Notes. URL http://www-m5. ma. tum. de/foswiki/pub M, 2012.
  53. Szegedy walk unitaries for quantum maps. Commun. Math. Phys., 402(3):3201–3231, 2023.
  54. A quantum–quantum Metropolis algorithm. PNAS, 109(3):754–759, 2012.
  55. Criteria for Davies irreducibility of Markovian quantum dynamics. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor, 2023.
Citations (18)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com