Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Co-design Accessible Public Robots: Insights from People with Mobility Disability, Robotic Practitioners and Their Collaborations (2404.05050v1)

Published 7 Apr 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Sidewalk robots are increasingly common across the globe. Yet, their operation on public paths poses challenges for people with mobility disabilities (PwMD) who face barriers to accessibility, such as insufficient curb cuts. We interviewed 15 PwMD to understand how they perceive sidewalk robots. Findings indicated that PwMD feel they have to compete for space on the sidewalk when robots are introduced. We next interviewed eight robotics practitioners to learn about their attitudes towards accessibility. Practitioners described how issues often stem from robotic companies addressing accessibility only after problems arise. Both interview groups underscored the importance of integrating accessibility from the outset. Building on this finding, we held four co-design workshops with PwMD and practitioners in pairs. These convenings brought to bear accessibility needs around robots operating in public spaces and in the public interest. Our study aims to set the stage for a more inclusive future around public service robots.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (86)
  1. [n. d.]. ADA Access to Buildings and Businesses (Public Accommodations) - Overview. https://www.findlaw.com/civilrights/discrimination/ada-access-to-buildings-and-businesses-public-accommodations.html.
  2. [n. d.]. Design Principles for Robot-Assisted Feeding in Social Contexts — Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568162.3576988.
  3. [n. d.]. Public Accommodations and Commercial Facilities (Title III). https://archive.ada.gov/ada_title_III.htm.
  4. 2020. Bill Information Senate Bill 1199 Regular Session 20192020 PA General Assembly. https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billInfo/BillInfo.cfm?syear=2019&sind=0&body=S&type=B&bn=1199. (undefined 2/7/2023 0:29).
  5. 2022. Starship Technologies completes four million autonomous deliveries. https://www.chargedretail.co.uk/2022/11/07/starship-technologies-completes-four-million-autonomous-deliveries/. (undefined 7/7/2023 5:48).
  6. Wayfinding and navigation for people with disabilities using social navigation networks. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Collaborative Computing 1, 2 (2014), e5.
  7. Emily Ackerman. 2019. Lessons From My Standoff With an Autonomous Sidewalk Robot. Bloomberg. com. Retrieved January 21 (2019), 2021.
  8. Enabling Building Service Robots to Guide Blind People: A Participatory Design Approach. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (Christchurch, New Zealand) (HRI ’16). IEEE Press, 3–10.
  9. Local vs. Avatar Robot: Performance and Perceived Workload of Service Encounters in Public Space. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8 (2021).
  10. Small Talk with a Robot? The Impact of Dialog Content, Talk Initiative, and Gaze Behavior of a Social Robot on Trust, Acceptance, and Proximity. International Journal of Social Robotics 13, 6 (Sept. 2021), 1485–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00730-0
  11. C. Bartneck and J. Forlizzi. 2004. A Design-Centred Framework for Social Human-Robot Interaction. In RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759). IEEE, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan, 591–594. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374827
  12. Accessibility and the crowded sidewalk: Micromobility’s impact on public space. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 365–380.
  13. Prajna Bhat and Yuhang Zhao. 2022. ” I was Confused by It; It was Confused by Me:” Exploring the Experiences of People with Visual Impairments around Mobile Service Robots. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1–26.
  14. Raden Agoeng Bhimasta and Pei-Yi Kuo. 2019. What causes the adoption failure of service robots? A Case of Henn-na Hotel in Japan. In Adjunct proceedings of the 2019 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing and proceedings of the 2019 ACM international symposium on wearable computers. 1107–1112.
  15. Trash Barrel Robots in the City. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 875–877. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568294.3580206
  16. Sophie Bushwick. 2021. The NYPD’s Robot Dog Was a Really Bad Idea: Here’s What Went Wrong. Scientific American (May 2021). https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-nypds-robot-dog-was-a-really-bad-idea-heres-what-went-wrong/
  17. Paul Cairney and Emily St Denny. 2020. Why Isn’t Government Policy More Preventive? Oxford University Press.
  18. Wearables and chairables: inclusive design of mobile input and output techniques for power wheelchair users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in computing systems. 3103–3112.
  19. Meia Chita-Tegmark and Matthias Scheutz. 2021. Assistive Robots for the Social Management of Health: A Framework for Robot Design and Human-Robot Interaction Research. International Journal of Social Robotics 13, 2 (2021), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00634-z
  20. Stef de Groot. 2019. Pedestrian Acceptance of Delivery Robots: Appearance, interaction and intelligence design. (2019).
  21. Impact of robot failures and feedback on real-time trust. In 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 251–258.
  22. With a little help of humans. an exploratory study of delivery robots stuck in snow. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 1023–1029.
  23. Data Navigator: An Accessibility Centered Data Navigation Toolkit. ([n. d.]).
  24. Eyelid gestures for people with motor impairments. Commun. ACM 65, 1 (2021), 108–115.
  25. Jennifer Fereday and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods 5, 1 (2006), 80–92.
  26. Where Third Wave HCI Meets HRI: Report from a Workshop on User-Centred Design of Robots. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. ACM, La Jolla California USA, 293–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/1514095.1514182
  27. Marcos Ferreira and Suely Sanches. 2007. Proposal of a Sidewalk Accessibility Index. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering 1 (June 2007), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4090/juee.2007.v1n1.001009
  28. Multiple Communication Roles in Human–Robot Interactions in Public Space. International Journal of Social Robotics 12, 4 (Aug. 2020), 931–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0509-0
  29. The Future of Urban Accessibility for People with Disabilities: Data Collection, Analytics, Policy, and Tools. In The 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Athens Greece, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3550402
  30. Steven Robert Gehrke. [n. d.]. Evaluation of Sidewalk Autonomous Delivery Robot Interactions with Pedestrians and Bicyclists. ([n. d.]), 54.
  31. Integration of the Social Environment in a Mobility Ontology for People with Motor Disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 13, 6 (Aug. 2018), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2017.1344887
  32. Designing Robots for Long-Term Social Interaction. In 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 1338–1343. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2005.1545303
  33. The Robot in Our Path: Investigating the Perceptions of People with Motor Disabilities on Navigating Public Space Alongside Sidewalk Robots. In Proceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1–6.
  34. Would you like to play with me? how robots’ group membership and task features influence human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. 9–16.
  35. IBM. 2022. Accessibility features IBM Documentation. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cognos-analytics/11.2.0?topic=pic-accessibility-features. (undefined 17/8/2023 0:57).
  36. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). [n. d.]. WCAG 2 Overview. https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/.
  37. Dylan Jennings and Miguel Figliozzi. 2019. Study of sidewalk autonomous delivery robots and their potential impacts on freight efficiency and travel. Transportation Research Record 2673, 6 (2019), 317–326.
  38. Robots Meet Humans-interaction in Public Spaces. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 52, 6 (Dec. 2005), 1530–1546. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2005.858730
  39. Making appearances: How robots should approach people. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI) 10, 1 (2021), 1–24.
  40. Piyawan Kasemsuppakorn and Hassan A Karimi. 2008. Data requirements and a spatial database for personalized wheelchair navigation. In Proceedings of the 2nd international convention on rehabilitation engineering & assistive technology. 31–34.
  41. Piyawan Kasemsuppakorn and Hassan A Karimi. 2009. Personalised routing for wheelchair navigation. Journal of Location Based Services 3, 1 (2009), 24–54.
  42. Understanding route choices for wheelchair navigation. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 10, 3 (2015), 198–210.
  43. Designed to Deter. Community Barriers to Physical Activity for People with Visual or Motor Impairments. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 34, 4 (April 2008), 349–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.005
  44. ‘Hey robot, please step back!’-exploration of a spatial threshold of comfort for human-mechanoid spatial interaction in a hallway scenario. In The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 780–787.
  45. Steps Toward Participatory Design of Social Robots: Mutual Learning with Older Adults with Depression. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, Vienna Austria, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020237
  46. The snackbot: documenting the design of a robot for long-term human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. 7–14.
  47. “I Choose Assistive Devices That Save My Face” A Study on Perceptions of Accessibility and Assistive Technology Use Conducted in China. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.
  48. Freedom to Choose: Understanding Input Modality Preferences of People with Upper-body Motor Impairments for Activities of Daily Living. In Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1–16.
  49. Understanding Visual Arts Experiences of Blind People. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–21.
  50. Is your web page accessible? A comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 41–50.
  51. Accessibility for the Disabled People to the Built Environment in Ankara, Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4 (Oct. 2009), 801–814.
  52. Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: sbstantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Social science & medicine 55, 8 (2002), 1435–1446.
  53. Christopher Mitchell. 2006. Pedestrian Mobility and Safety: A Key to Independence for Older People. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation 22 (Jan. 2006), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00013614-200601000-00007
  54. Stop doing it! Approaching strategy for a robot to admonish pedestrians. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 449–457.
  55. Bilge Mutlu and Jodi Forlizzi. 2008. Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. 287–294.
  56. Long-term co-design guidelines: empowering older adults as co-designers of social robots. In 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 1165–1172.
  57. Ethics, Equity, & Justice in Human-Robot Interaction: A Review and Future Directions. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 969–976. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900805
  58. A Proposal of Accessibility Guidelines for Human-Robot Interaction. Electronics 10, 5 (Jan. 2021), 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10050561
  59. A proposal of accessibility guidelines for human-robot interaction. Electronics 10, 5 (2021), 561.
  60. The forgotten in HRI: Incidental encounters with robots in public spaces. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 656–657.
  61. Project Sidewalk: A Web-based Crowdsourcing Tool for Collecting Sidewalk Accessibility Data At Scale. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300292
  62. Safety Concerns Emerging from Robots Navigating in Crowded Pedestrian Areas. International Journal of Social Robotics 14, 2 (March 2022), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00796-4
  63. A Review on Human–Robot Proxemics. Electronics 11, 16 (2022), 2490.
  64. Stop Ignoring Me! On Fighting the Trivialization of Social Robots in Public Spaces. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 11, 2, Article 11 (feb 2022), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3488241
  65. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2011. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 705–714.
  66. A mobile robot that performs human acceptable motions. In 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 1811–1816.
  67. Do speed and proximity affect human-robot collaboration with an industrial robot arm? International Journal of Social Robotics 14, 4 (2022), 1087–1102.
  68. Imagining public space robots of the near-future. Geoforum 124 (2021), 99–109.
  69. Teethtap: Recognizing discrete teeth gestures using motion and acoustic sensing on an earpiece. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 161–169.
  70. Leila Takayama and Caroline Pantofaru. 2009. Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction. In 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 5495–5502.
  71. Kristen Thomasen. 2020. Robots, Regulation, and the Changing Nature of Public Space.
  72. Sofia Thunberg and Tom Ziemke. 2020. Are People Ready for Social Robots in Public Spaces?. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, Cambridge United Kingdom, 482–484. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378294
  73. User Expectations of Robots in Public Spaces: A Co-design Methodology. In Social Robotics (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Alan R. Wagner, David Feil-Seifer, Kerstin S. Haring, Silvia Rossi, Thomas Williams, Hongsheng He, and Shuzhi Sam Ge (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_22
  74. Michelle Toh. 2020. Singapore deploys robot ‘dog’ to encourage social distancing. CNN Business (May 2020). https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/08/tech/singapore-coronavirus-social-distancing-robot-intl-hnk/index.html#:~:text=Singapore%20is%20trying%20a%20new,robot%2C%20at%20one%20local%20park.&text=Singapore%20had%20a%20model%20coronavirus%20response%2C%20then%20cases%20spiked.
  75. Co-Designing Socially Assistive Sidekicks for Motion-based AAC. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, Boulder CO USA, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434073.3444646
  76. Benchmarking Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools: Measuring the Harm of Sole Reliance on Automated Tests. In Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2461121.2461124
  77. Eduard Fosch Villaronga et al. 2019. Robots, standards and the law: Rivalries between private standards and public policymaking for robot governance. Computer Law & Security Review 35, 2 (2019), 129–144.
  78. An empirical framework for human-robot proxemics. Procs of new frontiers in human-robot interaction (2009).
  79. Katie Warren. [n. d.]. Toyota Just Started Building a 175-Acre Smart City at the Base of Mount Fuji in Japan. Photos Offer a Glimpse of What the ’Woven City’ Will Look Like. https://www.businessinsider.com/toyota-city-of-the-future-japan-mt-fuji-2020-1.
  80. Sharing the Sidewalk: Observing Delivery Robot Interactions with Pedestrians during a Pilot in Pittsburgh, PA. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 7, 5 (2023), 53.
  81. Robots Asking for Directions — The Willingness of Passers-by to Support Robots. In 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2010.5453273
  82. Feminist Human-Robot Interaction: Disentangling Power, Principles and Practice for Better, More Ethical HRI. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, Stockholm Sweden, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568162.3576973
  83. Collocated human-drone interaction: Methodology and approach strategy. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 172–181.
  84. Experiences developing socially acceptable interactions for a robotic trash barrel. In 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333693
  85. Deliberating with AI: Improving Decision-Making for the Future through Participatory AI Design and Stakeholder Deliberation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CSCW1 (April 2023), 125:1–125:32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579601
  86. Participatory Design of AI Systems: Opportunities and Challenges Across Diverse Users, Relationships, and Application Domains. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3516506

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets