Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
60 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
12 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Convex Reformulation of LMI-Based Distributed Controller Design with a Class of Non-Block-Diagonal Lyapunov Functions (2404.04576v2)

Published 6 Apr 2024 in math.OC, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: This study addresses a distributed state feedback controller design problem for continuous-time linear time-invariant systems by means of linear matrix inequalities (LMI). As the exact convexification is still open, the block-diagonal relaxation of Lyapunov functions has been prevalent despite its conservatism. In this work, we target a class of non-block-diagonal Lyapunov functions that has the same sparsity as distributed controllers. By leveraging a block-diagonal factorization of sparse matrices and Finsler's lemma, we first present a (nonlinear) matrix inequality for stabilizing distributed controllers with such Lyapunov functions, which boils down to a necessary and sufficient condition for such controllers if the sparsity pattern is chordal. As a relaxation of the inequality, we derive an LMI that completely covers the conventional relaxation and then provide analogous results for $H_\infty$ control. Lastly, numerical examples underscore the efficacy of our results.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. D. K. Molzahn, F. Dörfler, H. Sandberg, S. H. Low, S. Chakrabarti, R. Baldick, and J. Lavaei, “A survey of distributed optimization and control algorithms for electric power systems,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 2941–2962, 2017.
  2. P. Chanfreut, J. M. Maestre, and E. F. Camacho, “A survey on clustering methods for distributed and networked control systems,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 52, pp. 75–90, 2021.
  3. J. Anderson, J. C. Doyle, S. H. Low, and N. Matni, “System level synthesis,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 47, pp. 364–393, 2019.
  4. Y. Wang, L. Xie, and C. E. de Souza, “Robust decentralized control of interconnected uncertain linear systems,” in 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), vol. 3.   IEEE, 1995, pp. 2653–2658.
  5. A. Sootla, Y. Zheng, and A. Papachristodoulou, “On the existence of block-diagonal solutions to Lyapunov and ℋ∞subscriptℋ\mathcal{H}_{\infty}caligraphic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Riccati Inequalities,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 3170–3175, 2019.
  6. F. Ferrante, F. Dabbene, and C. Ravazzi, “On the design of structured stabilizers for LTI systems,” IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 289–294, 2019.
  7. L. Furieri, Y. Zheng, A. Papachristodoulou, and M. Kamgarpour, “Sparsity invariance for convex design of distributed controllers,” IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1836–1847, 2020.
  8. L. Yuan, S. Chen, C. Zhang, and G. Yang, “Parameter space optimization for robust controller synthesis with structured feedback gain,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 6815–6828, 2023.
  9. ——, “Structured controller synthesis through block-diagonal factorization and parameter space optimization,” Automatica, vol. 147, p. 110709, 2023.
  10. T. Tanaka and C. Langbort, “The bounded real lemma for internally positive systems and H-Infinity structured static state feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 2218–2223, 2011.
  11. A. Rantzer, “Scalable control of positive systems,” European Journal of Control, vol. 24, pp. 72–80, 2015.
  12. C. Scherer and S. Weiland, “Linear matrix inequalities in control,” Lecture Notes, 2015, URL: https://www.imng.uni-stuttgart.de/mst/files/LectureNotes.pdf.
  13. K. Sakurama, S.-i. Azuma, and T. Sugie, “Distributed controllers for multi-agent coordination via gradient-flow approach,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1471–1485, 2014.
  14. K. Sakurama and T. Sugie, “Generalized coordination of multi-robot systems,” Foundations and Trends® in Systems and Control, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–170, 2022.
  15. M. C. de Oliveira and R. E. Skelton, “Stability tests for constrained linear systems,” in Perspectives in robust control.   Springer, 2007, pp. 241–257.
  16. L. Vandenberghe and M. S. Andersen, “Chordal graphs and semidefinite optimization,” Foundations and Trends® in Optimization, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 241–433, 2015.
  17. Y. Zheng, G. Fantuzzi, and A. Papachristodoulou, “Chordal and factor-width decompositions for scalable semidefinite and polynomial optimization,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 52, pp. 243–279, 2021.
  18. M. Ikeda, D. Siljak, and D. White, “An inclusion principle for dynamic systems,” in American Control Conference.   IEEE, 1982, pp. 884–892.
  19. N. Kakimura, “A direct proof for the matrix decomposition of chordal-structured positive semidefinite matrices,” Linear Algebra and its Applications, vol. 433, no. 4, pp. 819–823, 2010.
  20. Y. Watanabe and K. Sakurama, “Distributed optimization of clique-wise coupled problems via three-operator splitting,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.18625, 2023.
  21. K.-C. Toh, M. J. Todd, and R. H. Tütüncü, “SDPT3—a MATLAB software package for semidefinite programming, version 1.3,” Optimization methods and software, vol. 11, no. 1-4, pp. 545–581, 1999.
  22. Y. Sekiguchi and H. Waki, “Perturbation analysis of singular semidefinite programs and its applications to control problems,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 188, pp. 52–72, 2021.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.