Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Machine learning augmented diagnostic testing to identify sources of variability in test performance (2404.03678v1)

Published 28 Mar 2024 in cs.LG, q-bio.PE, stat.AP, and stat.ML

Abstract: Diagnostic tests which can detect pre-clinical or sub-clinical infection, are one of the most powerful tools in our armoury of weapons to control infectious diseases. Considerable effort has been therefore paid to improving diagnostic testing for human, plant and animal diseases, including strategies for targeting the use of diagnostic tests towards individuals who are more likely to be infected. Here, we follow other recent proposals to further refine this concept, by using machine learning to assess the situational risk under which a diagnostic test is applied to augment its interpretation . We develop this to predict the occurrence of breakdowns of cattle herds due to bovine tuberculosis, exploiting the availability of exceptionally detailed testing records. We show that, without compromising test specificity, test sensitivity can be improved so that the proportion of infected herds detected by the skin test, improves by over 16 percentage points. While many risk factors are associated with increased risk of becoming infected, of note are several factors which suggest that, in some herds there is a higher risk of infection going undetected, including effects that are correlated to the veterinary practice conducting the test, and number of livestock moved off the herd.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. Godfray H.C.J., et al. (2013). “A restatement of the natural science evidence base relevant to the control of bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1768):pp. 20131634–20131634. ISSN 0962-8452. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1634.
  2. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2021). “Bovine TB: How to spot and report the disease”. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/bovine-tb.
  3. Bessell P.R., et al. (2012). “Risk factors for bovine Tuberculosis at the national level in Great Britain”. BMC Veterinary Research, 8(1):p. 51. ISSN 1746-6148. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-51.
  4. Uberoi E. (2019). “Bovine TB statistics: Great Britain”. Tech. rep., House of Commons Library.
  5. O’Brien D.J., et al. (2023). “The Road Not Traveled: Bovine Tuberculosis in England, Wales, and Michigan, USA”. One Health Cases, 2023:p. ohcs20230028. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/onehealthcases.2023.0028.
  6. Karolemeas K., et al. (2012). “Estimation of the Relative Sensitivity of the Comparative Tuberculin Skin Test in Tuberculous Cattle Herds Subjected to Depopulation”. PLOS ONE, 7(8):p. e43217. ISSN 1932-6203. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043217.
  7. Goodchild A.V., et al. (2015). “Specificity of the comparative skin test for bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain”. Veterinary Record, 177(10):pp. 258–258. ISSN 2042-7670. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.102961.
  8. De La Rua-Domenech R., et al. (2006). “Ante mortem diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle: A review of the tuberculin tests, γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-interferon assay and other ancillary diagnostic techniques”. Research in Veterinary Science, 81(2):pp. 190–210. ISSN 00345288. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2005.11.005.
  9. “Using machine learning improves predictions of herd-level bovine tuberculosis breakdowns in Great Britain”. Scientific Reports, 11(1):pp. 1–10. ISSN 20452322. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81716-4.
  10. Northern Ireland Audit Office (2016). “The Control of Bovine Tuberculosis in Northern Ireland”. https://www.niauditoffice.gov.uk/publications/control-bovine-tuberculosis-northern-ireland.
  11. TB Hub (2021). “Refinements to the interferon-gamma testing policy in the High Risk and Edge Area of England”. https://tbhub.co.uk/tb-policy/england/refinements-to-the-interferon-gamma-testing-policy-in-the-high-risk-and-edge-area-of-england/.
  12. Ke G., et al. (2017). “LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree”. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30. Curran Associates, Inc.
  13. “Sam online TB test submission”. http://apha.defra.gov.uk/official-vets/access-to-sam/index.htm.
  14. British Cattle Movement Service. “Use Cattle Tracing System (CTS) Online”. https://www.gov.uk/cattle-tracing-online.
  15. UK Farmcare Ltd. “UK Farmcare Ltd.” https://ukfarmcare.com/.
  16. scikit-learn. “Ensembles: Gradient boosting, random forests, bagging, voting, stacking”. https://scikit-learn/stable/modules/ensemble.html#histogram-based-gradient-boosting.
  17. “All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable’s Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneously”. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 20(177):pp. 1–81. ISSN 1533-7928.
  18. “A systematic approach to estimate the distribution and total abundance of British mammals”. PLOS ONE, 12(6):p. e0176339. ISSN 1932-6203. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176339.
  19. Toni T., et al. (2009). “Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems”. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 6(31):pp. 187–202. ISSN 17425662. 0901.1925, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0172.
  20. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2023). “Bovine TB statistics”. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/bovine-tb.
  21. Bessell P.R., et al. (2013). “Developing a framework for risk-based surveillance of tuberculosis in cattle: A case study of its application in Scotland”. Epidemiology & Infection, 141(2):pp. 314–323. ISSN 0950-2688, 1469-4409. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268812000635.
  22. Salvador L.C., et al. (2018). “Risk-based strategies for surveillance of tuberculosis infection in cattle for low-risk areas in England and Scotland”. Epidemiology and Infection, 146(1):pp. 107–118. ISSN 14694409. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268817001935.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.