Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Deep Image Composition Meets Image Forgery (2404.02897v2)

Published 3 Apr 2024 in cs.CV

Abstract: Image forgery is a topic that has been studied for many years. Before the breakthrough of deep learning, forged images were detected using handcrafted features that did not require training. These traditional methods failed to perform satisfactorily even on datasets much worse in quality than real-life image manipulations. Advances in deep learning have impacted image forgery detection as much as they have impacted other areas of computer vision and have improved the state of the art. Deep learning models require large amounts of labeled data for training. In the case of image forgery, labeled data at the pixel level is a very important factor for the models to learn. None of the existing datasets have sufficient size, realism and pixel-level labeling at the same time. This is due to the high cost of producing and labeling quality images. It can take hours for an image editing expert to manipulate just one image. To bridge this gap, we automate data generation using image composition techniques that are very related to image forgery. Unlike other automated data generation frameworks, we use state of the art image composition deep learning models to generate spliced images close to the quality of real-life manipulations. Finally, we test the generated dataset on the SOTA image manipulation detection model and show that its prediction performance is lower compared to existing datasets, i.e. we produce realistic images that are more difficult to detect. Dataset will be available at https://github.com/99eren99/DIS25k .

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. Image forgery detection confronts image composition. Computers & Graphics, 68:152–163, 2017.
  2. Defacto: Image and face manipulation dataset. In 2019 27th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pages 1–5, 2019.
  3. Microsoft COCO: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2014, Lecture notes in computer science, pages 740–755. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014.
  4. Learning jpeg compression artifacts for image manipulation detection and localization. International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(8):1875–1895, May 2022.
  5. Opa: Object placement assessment dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.01889, 2021.
  6. Exploring multi-modal fusion for image manipulation detection and localization. In Proc. 30th Int. Conf. on MultiMedia Modeling (MMM 2024), Jan.-Feb. 2024.
  7. Papers with Code - Exploring Multi-Modal Fusion for Image Manipulation Detection and Localization — paperswithcode.com. https://paperswithcode.com/paper/exploring-multi-modal-fusion-for-image. [Accessed 20-03-2024].
  8. Casia image tampering detection evaluation database. In 2013 IEEE China Summit and International Conference on Signal and Information Processing, pages 422–426, 2013.
  9. Tian Ng and S. Chang. A data set of authentic and spliced image blocks. 01 2004.
  10. Y. Hsu and S. Chang. Detecting image splicing using geometry invariants and camera characteristics consistency. In 2006 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, pages 549–552, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, jul 2006. IEEE Computer Society.
  11. Exposing digital image forgeries by illumination color classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 8(7):1182–1194, 2013.
  12. The point where reality meets fantasy: mixed adversarial generators for image splice detection. Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 2019.
  13. Imd2020: A large-scale annotated dataset tailored for detecting manipulated images. In 2020 IEEE Winter Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW), pages 71–80, 2020.
  14. Fighting fake news: Image splice detection via learned self-consistency. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), September 2018.
  15. Greatsplicing: A semantically rich splicing dataset, 2023.
  16. Autosplice: A text-prompt manipulated image dataset for media forensics. In 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), pages 893–903, 2023.
  17. Matteformer: Transformer-based image matting via prior-tokens. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 11686–11696, 2022.
  18. Papers with Code - Composition-1K Benchmark (Image Matting) — paperswithcode.com. https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-matting-on-composition-1k-1. [Accessed 20-03-2024].
  19. Harmonizer: Learning to perform white-box image and video harmonization. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022.
  20. Papers with Code - iHarmony4 Benchmark (Image Harmonization) — paperswithcode.com. https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-harmonization-on-iharmony4. [Accessed 20-03-2024].
  21. Fast object placement assessment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.14280, 2022.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Eren Tahir (2 papers)
  2. Mert Bal (2 papers)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com