Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
157 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
8 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Direct in-situ observations of wave-induced floe collisions in the deeper Marginal Ice Zone (2404.02750v3)

Published 3 Apr 2024 in physics.ao-ph

Abstract: Ocean waves propagating through the Marginal Ice Zone (MIZ) and the pack ice are strongly attenuated. This attenuation is critical for protecting sea ice from energetic wave events that could otherwise lead to sea ice break-up and dislocation over large areas. Despite the importance of waves-in-ice attenuation, the exact physical mechanisms involved, and their relative importance, are still uncertain. Here we present direct in situ measurements of floe-floe interactions under the influence of waves, including collisions between adjacent floes. The collision events we report are aligned with the incoming wave direction, and phase-locked to the wave signal, which indicates that the individual collisions we detect are wave-induced. The observations indicate a possible correlation between sudden increases in wave activity and the frequency of floe-floe collisions

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (46)
  1. Dagmar Budikova. Role of arctic sea ice in global atmospheric circulation: A review. Global and Planetary Change, 68(3):149–163, 2009.
  2. JS Wettlaufer. Heat flux at the ice-ocean interface. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 96(C4):7215–7236, 1991.
  3. Arctic sea ice decline in the 2010s: The increasing role of the ocean—air heat exchange in the late summer. Atmosphere, 10(4):184, 2019.
  4. Sea ice contribution to the air–sea co2 exchange in the arctic and southern oceans. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 63(5):823–830, 2011.
  5. Jim Thomson. Wave propagation in the marginal ice zone: connections and feedback mechanisms within the air–ice–ocean system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 380(2235):20210251, 2022.
  6. A review on northern hemisphere sea-ice, storminess and the north atlantic oscillation: Observations and projected changes. Atmospheric Research, 101(4):809–834, 2011.
  7. On the future navigability of arctic sea routes: High-resolution projections of the arctic ocean and sea ice. Marine Policy, 75:300–317, 2017.
  8. Arctic marginal ice zone trending wider in summer and narrower in winter. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(18):4864–4868, 2013.
  9. An elastic plate model for wave attenuation and ice floe breaking in the marginal ice zone. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113(C9), 2008.
  10. LG Bennetts and VA Squire. Model sensitivity analysis of scattering-induced attenuation of ice-coupled waves. Ocean Modelling, 45:1–13, 2012.
  11. A three-dimensional model of wave attenuation in the marginal ice zone. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 115(C12), 2010.
  12. Modeling ocean wave propagation under sea ice covers. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 31(1):1–15, 2015.
  13. Observations of wave dispersion and attenuation in landfast ice. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 121(3):1984–1997, 2016.
  14. A two layer model for wave dissipation in sea ice. Applied Ocean Research, 88:111–118, 2019.
  15. Three-layer viscoelastic model with eddy viscosity effect for flexural-gravity wave propagation through ice cover. Ocean Modelling, 131:15–23, 2018.
  16. Theoretical model for predicting the break-up of ice covers due to wave-ice interaction. Applied Ocean Research, 112:102614, 2021.
  17. Experiments on turbulence from colliding ice floes. Physics of Fluids, 34(6), 2022.
  18. Agnieszka Herman. Wave-induced surge motion and collisions of sea ice floes: Finite-floe-size effects. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 123(10):7472–7494, 2018.
  19. Towards a coupled model to investigate wave–sea ice interactions in the arctic marginal ice zone. The Cryosphere, 14(2):709–735, 2020.
  20. Wave dispersion and dissipation in landfast ice: comparison of observations against models. The Cryosphere, 15(12):5557–5575, 2021.
  21. Laboratory study of ice floes collisions under wave action. In ISOPE International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, pages ISOPE–I. ISOPE, 2018.
  22. Pancake sea ice kinematics and dynamics using shipboard stereo video. Annals of Glaciology, 61(82):1–11, 2020.
  23. Experiments on wave propagation in grease ice: combined wave gauges and particle image velocimetry measurements. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 864:876–898, 2019.
  24. Identification of ice floe impacts in an inertial time series and implications for wave measurement in pancake ice. In IGARSS 2023-2023 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pages 149–152. IEEE, 2023.
  25. A one-dimensional model for wave-induced ice-floe collisions. Annals of Glaciology, 15:87–95, 1991.
  26. In-situ observation of strong waves in ice amplitude modulation with a 12-hour period: a likely signature of complex physics governing waves in ice attenuation? 2024.
  27. An open source, versatile, affordable waves in ice instrument for scientific measurements in the polar regions. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 170:102955, 2020.
  28. The r/h sabvabaa—a research hovercraft for marine geophysical work in the most inaccessible area of the arctic ocean. The Leading Edge, 28(8):932–935, 2009.
  29. Measurements of wave damping by a grease ice slick in svalbard using off-the-shelf sensors and open-source electronics. Journal of Glaciology, 63(238):372–381, 2017.
  30. Measurements of waves in landfast ice using inertial motion units. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(11):6399–6408, 2016.
  31. A dataset of direct observations of sea ice drift and waves in ice. Scientific Data, 10(1):251, 2023.
  32. Sea ice remote sensing using amsr-e 89-ghz channels. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113(C2), 2008.
  33. A device for measuring wave-induced motion of ice floes in the antarctic marginal ice zone. Annals of Glaciology, 56(69):415–424, 2015.
  34. Waves in ocean engineering. Number Volume 5. 2001.
  35. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17:261–272, 2020. doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.
  36. Modern mathematical statistics with applications. Springer, third edition edition, 2021.
  37. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, volume 2. Springer, 2009.
  38. The Wamdi Group. The wam model—a third generation ocean wave prediction model. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 18(12):1775–1810, 1988.
  39. The wam model cycle 4. 1992.
  40. Semiempirical dissipation source functions for ocean waves. part i: Definition, calibration, and validation. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 40(9):1917–1941, 2010.
  41. The impact of a reduced high-wind charnock parameter on wave growth with application to the north sea, the norwegian sea, and the arctic ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 127(3), 2022. doi:10.1029/2021JC018196. URL https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC018196.
  42. WP Budgell. Numerical simulation of ice-ocean variability in the barents sea region: towards dynamical downscaling. Ocean Dynamics, 55(3-4):370–387, 2005.
  43. The us/uk world magnetic model for 2020-2025. 2020.
  44. Openmetbuoy-v2021: An easy-to-build, affordable, customizable, open-source instrument for oceanographic measurements of drift and waves in sea ice and the open ocean. Geosciences, 12(3):110, 2022.
  45. Characteristics of sea ice floe size distribution in the seasonal ice zone. Geophysical research letters, 33(2), 2006.
  46. C Laderach and Vera Schlindwein. Seismic arrays on drifting ice floes: experiences from four deployments in the arctic ocean. Seismological Research Letters, 82(4):494–503, 2011.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now