Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Change of Scenery: Transformative Insights from Retrospective VR Embodied Perspective-Taking of Conflict With a Close Other (2404.02277v1)

Published 2 Apr 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Close relationships are irreplaceable social resources, yet prone to high-risk conflict. Building on findings from the fields of HCI, virtual reality, and behavioral therapy, we evaluate the unexplored potential of retrospective VR-embodied perspective-taking to fundamentally influence conflict resolution in close others. We develop a biographically-accurate Retrospective Embodied Perspective-Taking system (REPT) and conduct a mixed-methods evaluation of its influence on close others' reflection and communication, compared to video-based reflection methods currently used in therapy (treatment as usual, or TAU). Our key findings provide evidence that REPT was able to significantly improve communication skills and positive sentiment of both partners during conflict, over TAU. The qualitative data also indicated that REPT surpassed basic perspective-taking by exclusively stimulating users to embody and reflect on both their own and their partner's experiences at the same level. In light of these findings, we provide implications and an agenda for social embodiment in HCI design: conceptualizing the use of `embodied social cognition,' and envisioning socially-embodied experiences as an interactive context.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (98)
  1. The Effect of Embodied Experiences on Self-Other Merging, Attitude, and Helping Behavior. Media Psychology 16, 1 (Jan. 2013), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.755877 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.755877.
  2. FMRI analysis of neural mechanisms underlying rehabilitation in virtual reality: activating secondary motor areas. Conference proceedings : … Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference 2006 (2006), 3692–3695. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260144 Place: United States.
  3. A mechanistic account of bodily resonance and implicit bias. Cognition 184 (2019), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.010
  4. Matt Billings and Leon A. Watts. 2010. Understanding dispute resolution online: using text to reflect personal and substantive issues in conflict. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1447–1456. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753542
  5. Am I a Bunny? The Impact of High and Low Immersion Platforms and Viewers’ Perceptions of Role on Presence, Narrative Engagement, and Empathy during an Animated 360° Video. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi-org.ezp2.lib.umn.edu/10.1145/3173574.3174031
  6. Can I Trust You? A User Study of Robot Mediation of a Support Group. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, New York City, USA, 8019–8026. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9196875
  7. Stephen Bochner. 2013. Cultures in contact: Studies in cross-cultural interaction. Vol. 1. Elsevier, Netherlands.
  8. Alice D. Boyes and Garth J. O. Fletcher. 2007. Metaperceptions of bias in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92, 2 (2007), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.286 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
  9. Kelly Caine. 2016. Local Standards for Sample Size at CHI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 981–992. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858498
  10. Rocco Salvatore Calabrò and Antonino Naro. 2020. Understanding Social Cognition Using Virtual Reality: Are We still Nibbling around the Edges? Brain Sciences 10, 1 (Jan. 2020), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010017 Number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
  11. Relationship Conflict: Conflict in Parent-Child, Friendship, and Romantic Relationships. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California. Google-Books-ID: 3NdyAwAAQBAJ.
  12. Why do friends understand each other better than strangers do? In Empathic accuracy. The Guilford Press, New York, NY, US, 169–193.
  13. ArtLinks: fostering social awareness and reflection in museums. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357121
  14. Regulating Feelings During Interpersonal Conflicts by Changing Voice Self-perception. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174205
  15. M Cox. 1991. Marital and parent-child relationships study. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
  16. Towards Computational Proxemics: Inferring Social Relations from Interpersonal Distances. In 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing. IEEE, New York, USA, 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.32
  17. Nancy Darling and Sara A. Clarke. 2009. Seeing the partner: A video recall study of emotional behavior in same-and mixed-sex late adolescent romantic couples. Journal of youth and adolescence 38, 7 (2009), 1015–1026. Publisher: Springer.
  18. Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan. 2014. Autonomy and Need Satisfaction in Close Relationships: Relationships Motivation Theory. In Human Motivation and Interpersonal Relationships: Theory, Research, and Applications, Netta Weinstein (Ed.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_3
  19. Alexander Diel and Michael Lewis. 2022. Familiarity, orientation, and realism increase face uncanniness by sensitizing to facial distortions. Journal of Vision 22, 4 (March 2022), 14. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.4.14
  20. Paul Dourish. 2001. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7221.001.0001
  21. The Interpretation of Statistical Power after the Data have been Gathered. Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) 39, 3 (June 2020), 870–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0018-1
  22. Embodying self-compassion within virtual reality and its effects on patients with depression. BJPsych Open 2, 1 (Jan. 2016), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002147 Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Bernardo M. Ferdman. 2017. Paradoxes of Inclusion: Understanding and Managing the Tensions of Diversity and Multiculturalism. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 53, 2 (2017), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886317702608 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886317702608
  24. Catherine Fichten and John Wright. 1983a. Videotape and verbal feedback in behavioral couple therapy: A review. Journal of Clinical Psychology 39, 2 (1983), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198303)39:2<216::AID-JCLP2270390212>3.0.CO;2-R _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/1097-4679%28198303%2939%3A2%3C216%3A%3AAID-JCLP2270390212%3E3.0.CO%3B2-R.
  25. Catherine S. Fichten. 1984. See It from My Point of View: Videotape and Attributions in Happy and Distressed Couples. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 2, 2 (Jan. 1984), 125–142. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1292184464/citation/C5DF5C2797EC446FPQ/1 Num Pages: 18 Place: New York, United States Publisher: Guilford Press.
  26. Catherine S. Fichten and John Wright. 1983b. Problem-solving skills in happy and distressed couples: Effects of videotape and verbal feedback. Journal of Clinical Psychology 39, 3 (1983), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198305)39:3<340::AID-JCLP2270390307>3.0.CO;2-H _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/1097-4679%28198305%2939%3A3%3C340%3A%3AAID-JCLP2270390307%3E3.0.CO%3B2-H.
  27. Actor-Observer Bias in Close Relationships: The Role of Self-Knowledge and Self-Related Language. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21, 5 (May 1995), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295215010 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
  28. Language Use and Attributional Biases in Close Personal Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17, 2 (April 1991), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616729101700205 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
  29. Shaun Gallagher. 2008. 22 - Understanding Others: Embodied Social Cognition. In Handbook of Cognitive Science, Paco Calvo and Antoni Gomila (Eds.). Elsevier, San Diego, 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-046616-3.00022-0
  30. Vittorio Gallese and Corrado Sinigaglia. 2011. What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15, 11 (Nov. 2011), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.09.003
  31. Malgorzata Gambin and Carla Sharp. 2018. Relations between empathy and anxiety dimensions in inpatient adolescents. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping 31, 4 (July 2018), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2018.1475868 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2018.1475868.
  32. What do others feel? Cognitive empathy deficits explain the association between callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems among preschool children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology 16, 6 (Nov. 2019), 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2018.1478810 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2018.1478810.
  33. More of the same? Conflicting perspectives of obesity causation and intervention amongst overweight people, health professionals and policy makers. Social Science & Medicine 70, 7 (2010), 1042–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.017
  34. Augmenting Couples’ Communication with Lifelines: Shared Timelines of Mixed Contextual Information. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300853
  35. Immersive virtual reality for increasing presence and empathy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 38, 4 (2022), 1115–1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12669 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jcal.12669.
  36. Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PLOS ONE 13, 10 (Oct. 2018), e0204494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204494 Publisher: Public Library of Science.
  37. Malte Husung and Eike Langbehn. 2019. Of portals and orbs: An evaluation of scene transition techniques for virtual reality. In Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2019. ACM, New York City, USA, 245–254.
  38. Naturalistic social cognition: Methodology, assessment, and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1 (1986), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.66 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
  39. Evaluation of a virtual reality enhanced bullying prevention curriculum pilot trial. Journal of Adolescence 71 (Feb. 2019), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.12.006
  40. Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking. NeuroImage 31, 1 (May 2006), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.026
  41. ”(We) Can Talk It Out…”: Designing for Promoting Conflict-Resolution Skills in Youth on a Moderated Minecraft Server. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW1 (May 2020), 049:1–049:26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392855
  42. The Differing Roles of Cognitive Empathy and Affective Empathy in the Relationship Between Trait Anger and Aggressive Behavior: A Chinese College Students Survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36, 19-20 (Oct. 2021), NP10937–NP10957. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519879229 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
  43. Haptic Empathy: Conveying Emotional Meaning through Vibrotactile Feedback. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451640
  44. Interactional Dimensions Coding System: Researchers manual. (1987).
  45. Using Robots to Moderate Team Conflict: The Case of Repairing Violations. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696460
  46. Augmented Virtual Reality Meditation: Shared Dyadic Biofeedback Increases Social Presence Via Respiratory Synchrony. Trans. Soc. Comput. 4, 2 (May 2021), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449358 Place: New York, NY, USA Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery.
  47. The Communicated Perspective-Taking Rating System and links to well-being in marital conflict. Personal Relationships 24, 1 (2017), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12177 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/pere.12177.
  48. David A. Kenny and Linda K. Acitelli. 2001. Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (2001), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.439 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
  49. Patricia K. Kerig and Donald H. Baucom. 2004. Couple Observational Coding Systems. Taylor & Francis, New York, USA. Google-Books-ID: wX9j0iR2JMQC.
  50. The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 21, 4 (Nov. 2012), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00124
  51. Dyadic Mirror: Everyday Second-Person Live-View for Empathetic Reflection upon Parent-Child Interaction. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 4, 3 (Sept. 2020), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411815 Place: New York, NY, USA Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery.
  52. David Kirsh. 2013. Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 1 (April 2013), 3:1–3:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2442106.2442109
  53. A Virtual Reality Embodiment Technique to Enhance Helping Behavior of Police Toward a Victim of Police Racial Aggression. PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality 28 (Oct. 2021), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00339
  54. He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240698
  55. Olga M. Klimecki. 2019. The Role of Empathy and Compassion in Conflict Resolution. Emotion Review 11, 4 (Oct. 2019), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919838609 Publisher: SAGE Publications.
  56. A Breathtaking Journey. On the Design of an Empathy-Arousing Mixed-Reality Game. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI PLAY ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968110
  57. The Curious Case of the Transdiegetic Cow, or a Mission to Foster Other-Oriented Empathy Through Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376748 event-place: Honolulu, HI, USA.
  58. The Effect of Expressive Biosignals on Empathy and Closeness for a Stigmatized Group Member. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 201:1–201:17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359303
  59. Significant Otter: Understanding the Role of Biosignals in Communication. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 334, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445200
  60. Virtual reality perspective-taking increases cognitive empathy for specific others. PLOS ONE 13, 8 (Aug. 2018), e0202442. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202442 Publisher: Public Library of Science.
  61. Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19, 1 (2015), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.001
  62. Virtual reality improves emotional but not cognitive empathy: A meta-analysis. Technology, Mind, and Behavior 2 (2021), No Pagination Specified–No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000034 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
  63. AffectAura: an intelligent system for emotional memory. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 849–858. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208525
  64. Empathy for the social suffering of friends and strangers recruits distinct patterns of brain activation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 8, 4 (March 2012), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss019 _eprint: https://academic.oup.com/scan/article-pdf/8/4/446/27108073/nss019.pdf.
  65. Understanding Emoji Ambiguity in Context: The Role of Text in Emoji-Related Miscommunication. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 11, 1 (May 2017), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14901 Number: 1.
  66. Perspective-taking influences autonomic attunement between partners during discussion of conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 34, 2 (March 2017), 139–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515626595 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  67. An Embodied Perspective as a Victim of Sexual Harassment in Virtual Reality Reduces Action Conformity in a Later Milgram Obedience Scenario. Scientific Reports 10, 1 (April 2020), 6207. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62932-w Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  68. Raymond S. Nickerson. 1999. How we know—and sometimes misjudge—what others know: Imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin 125 (1999), 737–759. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.737 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
  69. Conversations between self and self as Sigmund Freud—A virtual body ownership paradigm for self counselling. Scientific Reports 5, 1 (Sept. 2015), 13899. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13899 Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  70. Nickola C. Overall and Jeffry A. Simpson. 2015. Attachment and Dyadic Regulation Processes. Current opinion in psychology 1 (Feb. 2015), 61–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.008
  71. Paula R. Pietromonaco and Nancy L. Collins. 2017. Interpersonal mechanisms linking close relationships to health. American Psychologist 72 (2017), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000129 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
  72. Scene transitions and teleportation in virtual reality and the implications for spatial awareness and sickness. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 26, 6 (2018), 2273–2287.
  73. Season Traveller: Multisensory Narration for Enhancing the Virtual Reality Experience. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174151
  74. Dennis T. Regan and Judith Totten. 1975. Empathy and attribution: Turning observers into actors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32, 5 (1975), 850–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.850 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
  75. The roles of emotion management and perspective taking in individuals’ conflict management styles and disposition to forgive. Journal of Research in Personality 42, 6 (Dec. 2008), 1594–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.014
  76. Social Reflections on Fitness Tracking Data: A Study with Families in Low-SES Neighborhoods. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi-org.ezp3.lib.umn.edu/10.1145/3290605.3300543
  77. Marc S Schulz and Robert J Waldinger. 2004. Looking in the mirror: Participants as observers of their own and their partners’ emotions in marital interactions. In Couple observational coding systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 259–272.
  78. Isles of Emotion: Emotionally Expressive Social Virtual Spaces for Reflection and Communication. In Creativity and Cognition (C&amp;C ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3466805
  79. ”Stop. I See a Conflict Happening.”: A Robot Mediator for Young Children’s Interpersonal Conflict Resolution. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171248
  80. Mel Slater. 2017a. Implicit Learning Through Embodiment in Immersive Virtual Reality. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5490-7_2
  81. Mel Slater. 2017b. Implicit Learning Through Embodiment in Immersive Virtual Reality. In Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Realities in Education, Dejian Liu, Chris Dede, Ronghuai Huang, and John Richards (Eds.). Springer, Singapore, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5490-7_2
  82. Mel Slater and Maria V. Sanchez-Vives. 2016. Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3 (2016). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074
  83. Shannon Spaulding. 2012. Introduction to debates on embodied social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11, 4 (Dec. 2012), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-012-9275-x
  84. R. Weylin Sternglanz and Bella M. DePaulo. 2004. READING NONVERBAL CUES TO EMOTIONS: THE ADVANTAGES AND LIABILITIES OF RELATIONSHIP CLOSENESS. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 28, 4 (Dec. 2004), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-004-4158-7
  85. Michael D. Storms. 1973. Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors’ and observers’ points of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27, 2 (1973), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034782 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
  86. Gail M. Sullivan and Richard Feinn. 2012. Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education 4, 3 (Sept. 2012), 279–282. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
  87. Suzanne C. Thompson and Harold H. Kelley. 1981. Judgments of responsibility for activities in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41 (1981), 469–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.469 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
  88. Shared neural codes for visual and semantic information about familiar faces in a common representational space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 45 (Nov. 2021), e2110474118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2110474118 Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  89. Jacquie D. Vorauer and Tamara A. Sucharyna. 2013. Potential negative effects of perspective-taking efforts in the context of close relationships: Increased bias and reduced satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 104 (2013), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030184 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
  90. Slice of light: Transparent and integrative transition among realities in a multi-HMD-user environment. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, New York, USA, 805–817.
  91. Again, Together: Socially Reliving Virtual Reality Experiences When Separated. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376642
  92. Gender and close relationships. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, US. Pages: xiii, 168.
  93. Can You Hear My Heartbeat?: Hearing an Expressive Biosignal Elicits Empathy. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi-org.ezp3.lib.umn.edu/10.1145/3411764.3445545
  94. John Wright and Catherine Fichten. 1976. Denial of responsibility, videotape feedback and attribution theory: Relevance for behavioral marital therapy. Canadian Psychological Review/Psychologie canadienne 17, 3 (1976), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081841 Place: Canada Publisher: Canadian Psychological Association.
  95. Koji Yatani. 2016. Effect Sizes and Power Analysis in HCI. In Modern Statistical Methods for HCI, Judy Robertson and Maurits Kaptein (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26633-6_5
  96. Nick Yee and Jeremy Bailenson. 2006. Walk a mile in digital shoes: The impact of embodied perspective-taking on the reduction of negative stereotyping in immersive virtual environments. In Teleoperators and Virtual Environments - Presence. PRESENCE, Cleveland Ohio.
  97. Nick Yee and Jeremy Bailenson. 2007. The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior. Human Communication Research 33, 3 (July 2007), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x
  98. Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis? General Psychiatry 32, 4 (Aug. 2019), e100069. https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2019-100069 Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd Section: Biostatistical methods in psychiatry.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets