Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Deep Neural Networks with 3D Point Clouds for Empirical Friction Measurements in Hydrodynamic Flood Models (2404.02234v1)

Published 2 Apr 2024 in cs.LG and physics.flu-dyn

Abstract: Friction is one of the cruxes of hydrodynamic modeling; flood conditions are highly sensitive to the Friction Factors (FFs) used to calculate momentum losses. However, empirical FFs are challenging to measure because they require laboratory experiments. Flood models often rely on surrogate observations (such as land use) to estimate FFs, introducing uncertainty. This research presents a laboratory-trained Deep Neural Network (DNN), trained using flume experiments with data augmentation techniques, to measure Manning's n based on Point Cloud data. The DNN was deployed on real-world lidar Point Clouds to directly measure Manning's n under regulatory and extreme storm events, showing improved prediction capabilities in both 1D and 2D hydrodynamic models. For 1D models, the lidar values decreased differences with regulatory models for in-channel water depth when compared to land cover values. For 1D/2D coupled models, the lidar values produced better agreement with flood extents measured from airborne imagery, while better matching flood insurance claim data for Hurricane Harvey. In both 1D and 1D/2D coupled models, lidar resulted in better agreement with validation gauges. For these reasons, the lidar measurements of Manning's n were found to improve both regulatory models and forecasts for extreme storm events, while simultaneously providing a pathway to standardize the measurement of FFs. Changing FFs significantly affected fluvial and pluvial flood models, while surge flooding was generally unaffected. Downstream flow conditions were found to change the importance of FFs to fluvial models, advancing the literature of friction in flood models. This research introduces a reliable, repeatable, and readily-accessible avenue to measure high-resolution FFs based on 3D point clouds, improving flood prediction, and removing uncertainty from hydrodynamic modeling.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. “Effects of LiDAR-derived, spatially distributed vegetation roughness on two-dimensional hydraulics in a gravel-cobble river at flows of 0.2 to 20 times bankfull” In Geomorphology 206, 2014, pp. 468–482 DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.10.017
  2. Helen Dorn, Michael Vetter and Bernhard Höfle “GIS-based roughness derivation for flood simulations: A comparison of orthophotos, LiDAR and Crowdsourced Geodata” In Remote Sensing 6, 2014, pp. 1739–1759 DOI: 10.3390/rs6021739
  3. “Evaluating scale and roughness effects in urban flood modelling using terrestrial LIDAR data” In Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 17, 2013, pp. 4015–4030 DOI: 10.5194/hess-17-4015-2013
  4. Stuart N. Lane “Roughness - Time for a re-evaluation?” In Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30, 2005, pp. 251–253 DOI: 10.1002/esp.1208
  5. Mark W. Smith, Nicholas J. Cox and Louise J. Bracken “Applying flow resistance equations to overland flows” In Progress in Physical Geography 31 SAGE Publications Ltd, 2007, pp. 363–387 DOI: 10.1177/0309133307081289
  6. Stephen C Medeiros, Scott C Hagen and John F Weishampel “Comparison of floodplain surface roughness parameters derived from land cover data and field measurements” In Journal of Hydrology 452 Elsevier, 2012, pp. 139–149
  7. Gary Brunner “HEC-RAS River Analysis System User’s Manual”, 2010 URL: www.hec.usace.army.mil
  8. BMT WBM “TUFLOW User Manual - Build 2016-03-AA”, 2016
  9. Stephen C. Medeiros, Scott C. Hagen and John F. Weishampel “A Random Forest Model Based on Lidar and Field Measurements for Parameterizing Surface Roughness in Coastal Modeling” In IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 8 Institute of ElectricalElectronics Engineers, 2015, pp. 1582–1590 DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2419817
  10. Stanford Gibson “Advanced Modeling 2.5 - Land Cover Layer and Manning’s N Values”, 2021 Youtube URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_3fpF-OWHo
  11. C J Lopez-Sabater, K G Renard and V L Lopes “NEURAL-NETWORK-BASED ALGORITHMS OF HYDRAULIC ROUGHNESS FOR OVERLAND FLOW”, 2002
  12. Majid Niazkar, Nasser Talebbeydokhti and Seied Hosein Afzali “Novel Grain and Form Roughness Estimator Scheme Incorporating Artificial Intelligence Models” In Water Resources Management 33 Springer Netherlands, 2019, pp. 757–773 DOI: 10.1007/s11269-018-2141-z
  13. J C Fu, M H Hsu and Y Duann “Development of roughness updating based on artificial neural network in a river hydraulic model for flash flood forecasting”
  14. “Estimation of Manning Roughness Coefficient in Alluvial Rivers with Bed Forms Using Soft Computing Models” In Water Resources Management 37 Springer ScienceBusiness Media B.V., 2023, pp. 3563–3584 DOI: 10.1007/s11269-023-03514-z
  15. “Large scale prediction of channel roughness coefficient using machine learning” CUAHSI, 2022, pp. 34 URL: https://www.cuahsi.org/uploads/library/doc/SI2022_Report_v1.2.docx.pdf
  16. “Advances in remote sensing of hydraulic roughness” In International Journal of Remote Sensing 33 TaylorFrancis Ltd., 2012, pp. 630–654 DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2010.531788
  17. “Floodplain roughness parameterization using airborne laser scanning and spectral remote sensing” In Remote Sensing of Environment 112, 2008, pp. 1062–1080 DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.012
  18. “On the flow of water in open channels and pipes”, 1890
  19. In Hydraulic Lab Equipment HR Wallingford URL: https://equipit.hrwallingford.com/hydraulic-lab-equipment/twin-wire-wave-probes
  20. “Data AcQuisition software (HR DAQ) — HR Wallingford Equip-IT” URL: https://equipit.hrwallingford.com/hydraulic-lab-equipment/data-acquisition-software-hr-daq
  21. “Lidar-based Surface Roughness Estimation for Hydrodynamic Models using Deep Learning” Poster presentation In American Geophysical Union, 2023
  22. “PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation”, 2017 arXiv:1612.00593 [cs.CV]
  23. Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba “Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization”, 2017 arXiv:1412.6980 [cs.LG]
  24. Texas Natural Resources Information System “Upper Coast Lidar — 2018” [Accessed 02-07-2024] URL: https://data.tnris.org/collection/?c=b5bd2b96-8ba5-4dc6-ba88-d88133eb6643
  25. “Simulation of Hurricane Harvey flood event through coupled hydrologic-hydraulic models: Challenges and next steps” In Journal of Flood Risk Management 14.3 Wiley Online Library, 2021, pp. e12716
  26. Harris County Flood Control District “Flooding Impacts in Connection with the Reservoirs” [Accessed 02-07-2024] URL: https://www.hcfcd.org/About/Harris-Countys-Flooding-History/Hurricane-Harvey/Countywide-Impacts/Flooding-Impacts-in-Connection-with-the-Reservoirs
  27. Harris County Flood Control District “Model and Map Management System” [Accessed 02-07-2024] URL: https://www.hcfcd.org/Resources/Interactive-Mapping-Tools/Model-and-Map-Management-M3-System
  28. Harris County Flood Control District “2019 Policy Criteria and Procedure Manual” Section 4.3
  29. Harris County Flood Control District “2009 Hydrology and Hydraulics Guidance Manual” Section II.2.3
  30. Stuart Lloyd “Least squares quantization in PCM” In IEEE transactions on information theory 28.2 IEEE, 1982, pp. 129–137
  31. V. Te Chow “Open-channel Hydraulics”, Civil engineering series McGraw-Hill, 1959 URL: https://books.google.com/books?id=w6Q8AAAAIAAJ
  32. Robert E Horton “Separate roughness coefficients for channel bottom and sides” In Engineering News Record 111.22, 1933, pp. 652–653
  33. HA Einstein “Der hydraulische oder profil-radius” In Schweizerische Bauzeitung 103.8, 1934, pp. 89–91
  34. Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium “National Land COver Dataset 2021” [Accessed 02-07-2024] URL: https://www.mrlc.gov/
  35. Harris County Flood Control District “Spring Creek” [Accessed 03-01-2024], https://www.hcfcd.org/Activity/Active-Projects/Spring-Creek
  36. US Army Corps Engineers “HEC-RAS Guides and Tutorials - Creating an Combined 1D/2D Model” [Accessed 02-07-2024] URL: https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/confluence/rasdocs/hgt/latest/guides/creating-an-combined-1d-2d-model
  37. “The manning’s roughness coefficient calibration method to improve flood hazard analysis in the absence of river bathymetric data: Application to the urban historical zamora city centre in spain” In Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 11 MDPI, 2021 DOI: 10.3390/app11199267
  38. National Oceanic National Geodetic Survey and Atmospheric Adminsitration “Hurricane Harvey Imagery” [Accessed 02-05-2024], https://storms.ngs.noaa.gov/storms/harvey/index.html, 2017
  39. “A flood inundation forecast of Hurricane Harvey using a continental-scale 2D hydrodynamic model” In Journal of Hydrology X 4, 2019, pp. 100039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2019.100039
  40. Matthew Garcia, Andrew Juan and Philip Bedient “Integrating reservoir operations and flood modeling with HEC-RAS 2D” In Water 12.8 MDPI, 2020, pp. 2259
  41. “Hindcast of pluvial, fluvial, and coastal flood damage in Houston, Texas during Hurricane Harvey (2017) using SFINCS” In Natural hazards 109 Springer, 2021, pp. 2343–2362
  42. “Manning’s N – Putting Roughness to Work”, 2011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762154

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets