MindArm: Mechanized Intelligent Non-Invasive Neuro-Driven Prosthetic Arm System (2403.19992v2)
Abstract: Currently, individuals with arm mobility impairments (referred to as "patients") face limited technological solutions due to two key challenges: (1) non-invasive prosthetic devices are often prohibitively expensive and costly to maintain, and (2) invasive solutions require high-risk, costly brain surgery, which can pose a health risk. Therefore, current technological solutions are not accessible for all patients with different financial backgrounds. Toward this, we propose a low-cost technological solution called MindArm, an affordable, non-invasive neuro-driven prosthetic arm system. MindArm employs a deep neural network (DNN) to translate brain signals, captured by low-cost surface electroencephalogram (EEG) electrodes, into prosthetic arm movements. Utilizing an Open Brain Computer Interface and UDP networking for signal processing, the system seamlessly controls arm motion. In the compute module, we run a trained DNN model to interpret filtered micro-voltage brain signals, and then translate them into a prosthetic arm action via serial communication seamlessly. Experimental results from a fully functional prototype show high accuracy across three actions, with 91% for idle/stationary, 85% for handshake, and 84% for cup pickup. The system costs approximately $500-550, including $400 for the EEG headset and $100-150 for motors, 3D printing, and assembly, offering an affordable alternative for mind-controlled prosthetic devices.
- B. Armour, E. Courtney-Long, M. Fox, H. Fredine, and A. Cahill, “Prevalence and causes of paralysis-united states, 2013,” American journal of public health, vol. 106, pp. e1–e3, 08 2016.
- C. McDonald, S. Westcott-McCoy, M. Weaver, J. Haagsma, and D. Kartin, “Global prevalence of traumatic non-fatal limb amputation,” Prosthetics and Orthotics International, vol. Publish Ahead of Print, 12 2020.
- E. Kwek and M. Choi, “Is a prosthetic arm customized prada? a critical perspective on the social aspects of prosthetic arms,” Disability & Society, vol. 31, pp. 1144 – 1147, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:152081983
- T. Beyrouthy, S. A. Kork, J. A. Korbane, and A. Abdulmonem, “Eeg mind controlled smart prosthetic arm,” 2016 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Innovative Business Practices for the Transformation of Societies (EmergiTech), pp. 404–409, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:34212152
- L. H. B. Huinink, H. Bouwsema, D. H. Plettenburg, C. K. van der Sluis, and R. M. Bongers, “Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 13, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:1815633
- J. Collinger, S. Foldes, T. Bruns, B. Wodlinger, R. Gaunt, and D. Weber, “Neuroprosthetic technology for individuals with spinal cord injury,” The journal of spinal cord medicine, vol. 36, pp. 258–272, 07 2013.
- B. Yuan, D. Hu, S. Gu, S. Xiao, and F. Song, “The global burden of traumatic amputation in 204 countries and territories,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1258853
- C. Bloomer and K. L. Kontson, “Comparison of deka arm and body-powered upper limb prosthesis joint kinematics,” Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 100057, 2020.
- S. M. M. Rahman, H. Mattila, M. Janka, and J. Virkki, “Impedance evaluation of textile electrodes for eeg measurements,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 93, no. 7-8, pp. 1878–1888, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175221135131
- K. R. K. Kadir A. Yildiz, Alexander Y. Shin, “Interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of a neuroprosthetic limb: a review,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. Publish Ahead of Print, March 2020.
- P. Visconti, F. Gaetani, G. Zappatore, and P. Primiceri, “Technical features and functionalities of myo armband: An overview on related literature and advanced applications of myoelectric armbands mainly focused on arm prostheses,” International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems, vol. 11, pp. 1–25, 06 2018.
- M. Sarraf, E. Rezvani Ghomi, S. Alipour, S. Ramakrishna, and N. Liana Sukiman, “A state-of-the-art review of the fabrication and characteristics of titanium and its alloys for biomedical applications,” Bio-design and Manufacturing, pp. 1–25, 2021.
- D. R. Sandra V A, “Brain gate technology,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), vol. Publish Ahead of Print, 2015.
- OPENBCI. (2024) The complete ultracortex. [Online]. Available: https://shop.openbci.com/products/the-complete-headset-eeg
- Emotiv. (2024) Epoc. [Online]. Available: https://www.emotiv.com/epoc
- OPENBCI. (2024) Ganglion board (4-channels). [Online]. Available: https://shop.openbci.com/products/ganglion-board
- A. Roshdy, S. Al Kork, S. Said, and T. Beyrouthy, “A wearable exoskeleton rehabilitation device for paralysis-a comprehensive study,” vol. 4, pp. 17–26, 01 2019.
- OpenBCI. (2024) Ganglion data format. [Online]. Available: https://docs.openbci.com/Ganglion/GanglionDataFormat/