Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Quantifying the Aggregate Flexibility of EV Charging Stations for Dependable Congestion Management Products: A Dutch Case Study (2403.13367v2)

Published 20 Mar 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: Electric vehicles (EVs) play a crucial role in the transition towards sustainable modes of transportation and thus are critical to the energy transition. As their number grows, managing the aggregate power of EV charging is crucial to maintain grid stability and mitigate congestion. This study analyses more than 500 thousand real charging transactions in the Netherlands to explore the challenge and opportunity for the energy system presented by EV growth and smart charging flexibility. Specifically, it analyses the collective ability to provide congestion management services according to the specifications of those services in the Netherlands. In this study, a data-driven model of charging behaviour is created to explore the implications of delivering dependable congestion management services at various aggregation levels and types of service. The probability of offering specific grid services by different categories of charging stations (CS) is analysed. These probabilities can help EV aggregators, such as charging point operators, make informed decisions about offering congestion mitigation products per relevant regulations and distribution system operators to assess their potential. The ability to offer different flexibility products, namely re-dispatch and capacity limitation, for congestion management, is assessed using various dispatch strategies. Next, machine learning models are used to predict the probability of CSs being able to deliver these products, accounting for uncertainties. Results indicate that residential charging locations have significant potential to provide both products during evening peak hours. While shared EVs offer better certainty regarding arrival and departure times, their small fleet size currently restricts their ability to meet the minimum order size of flexible products.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. A. Gadea, M. Marinelli, and A. Zecchino, “A Market Framework for Enabling Electric Vehicles Flexibility Procurement at the Distribution Level Considering Grid Constraints,” in 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), pp. 1–7, IEEE, 6 2018.
  2. IRENA, “Innovation outlook: Smart charging for electric vehicles,” tech. rep., International Renewable Energy Agency, 2019.
  3. W. Kempton and J. Tomić, “Vehicle-to-grid power implementation: From stabilizing the grid to supporting large-scale renewable energy,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 144, pp. 280–294, 6 2005.
  4. G. Alkawsi, Y. Baashar, D. Abbas U, A. A. Alkahtani, and S. K. Tiong, “Review of Renewable Energy-Based Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, p. 3847, 4 2021.
  5. N. Sadeghianpourhamami, N. Refa, M. Strobbe, and C. Develder, “Quantitive analysis of electric vehicle flexibility: A data-driven approach,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 95, pp. 451–462, 2 2018.
  6. M. Zade, Z. You, B. Kumaran Nalini, P. Tzscheutschler, and U. Wagner, “Quantifying the Flexibility of Electric Vehicles in Germany and California—A Case Study,” Energies, vol. 13, p. 5617, 10 2020.
  7. A. Sørensen, K. Lindberg, I. Sartori, and I. Andresen, “Analysis of residential ev energy flexibility potential based on real-world charging reports and smart meter data,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 241, p. 110923, 2021.
  8. J. Soares, J. Almeida, L. Gomes, B. Canizes, Z. Vale, and E. Neto, “Electric vehicles local flexibility strategies for congestion relief on distribution networks,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 62–69, 6 2022.
  9. C. Birk Jones, W. Vining, M. Lave, T. Haines, C. Neuman, J. Bennett, and D. R. Scoffield, “Impact of Electric Vehicle customer response to Time-of-Use rates on distribution power grids,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 8225–8235, 11 2022.
  10. Ofgem and PWC, “Energy consumers’ experiences and perceptions of smart ’Time of Use’ tariffs,” Tech. Rep. September, Ofgem and PWC, London, 2020.
  11. J. M. Clairand, “Participation of electric vehicle aggregators in ancillary services considering users’ preferences,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 12, pp. 1–17, 12 2020.
  12. F. Gonzalez Venegas, M. Petit, and Y. Perez, “Active integration of electric vehicles into distribution grids: Barriers and frameworks for flexibility services,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 145, p. 111060, 7 2021.
  13. M. A. Fotouhi Ghazvini, G. Lipari, M. Pau, F. Ponci, A. Monti, J. Soares, R. Castro, and Z. Vale, “Congestion management in active distribution networks through demand response implementation,” Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, vol. 17, p. 100185, 3 2019.
  14. Z. Liu, Q. Wu, S. S. Oren, S. Huang, R. Li, and L. Cheng, “Distribution Locational Marginal Pricing for Optimal Electric Vehicle Charging Through Chance Constrained Mixed-Integer Programming,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 9, pp. 644–654, 3 2018.
  15. R. J. Hennig, D. Ribó-Pérez, L. J. de Vries, and S. H. Tindemans, “What is a good distribution network tariff?—Developing indicators for performance assessment,” Applied Energy, vol. 318, p. 119186, 7 2022.
  16. A. N. M. M. Haque, M. Nijhuis, G. Ye, P. H. Nguyen, F. W. Bliek, and J. G. Slootweg, “Integrating Direct and Indirect Load Control for Congestion Management in LV Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, pp. 741–751, 1 2019.
  17. E. Valsomatzis, T. B. Pedersen, and A. Abelló, “Day-ahead Trading of Aggregated Energy Flexibility,” in Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Future Energy Systems, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 134–138, ACM, 6 2018.
  18. W. Liu, Q. Wu, F. Wen, and J. Ostergaard, “Day-Ahead Congestion Management in Distribution Systems Through Household Demand Response and Distribution Congestion Prices,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 5, pp. 2739–2747, 11 2014.
  19. R. Hennig, S. H. Tindemans, and L. De Vries, “Market Failures in Local Flexibility Market Proposals for Distribution Network Congestion Management,” International Conference on the European Energy Market, EEM, vol. 2022-Septe, 2022.
  20. S. Huang, Q. Wu, S. S. Oren, R. Li, and Z. Liu, “Distribution Locational Marginal Pricing Through Quadratic Programming for Congestion Management in Distribution Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 2170–2178, 2015.
  21. Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Klimaat, “Klimaatakkoord,” Klimaatverandering | Rijksoverheid.nl, 2019.
  22. Netherlands Enterprise Agency, “Electric Vehicles Statistics in the Netherlands,” Tech. Rep. July, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, 2022.
  23. Dutch National Charging Infrastructure Agenda Brochure, “Smart charging for all 2022-2025,” tech. rep., National Charging Infrastructure Agenda, 2022.
  24. NAL WG Smart Charging core team, “Smart charging requirements (SCR),” tech. rep., Nationale Agenda Laadinfrastructuur, 2 2021.
  25. Peter Palensky (TU Delft), Jose Rueda Torres (TU Delft), Pedro Vergara Aleksandar Boričić (TU Delft), Aihui Fu (TU Delft), and Paul Voskuilen (AMS Institute), “Solutions for congestion in medium-voltage grids: the Buiksloterham-Zuid/Overhoeks Amsterdam case,” tech. rep., Delft University of Technology, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions, Delft, 8 2021.
  26. A. f. C. The Netherlands and M. (ACM), “Decree of the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets of 24 May 2022 reference ACM/UIT/577139 amending the conditions as referred to in Article 31 of the Electricity Act 1998 regarding rules regarding transport scarcity and congestion management,” 2022.
  27. A. f. C. The Netherlands and M. (ACM), “Code decision non-firm ATO (Case number: ACM/22/180165),” 2024.
  28. “Open charge point interface (ocpi) 2.1.1.” https://github.com/ocpi/ocpi, 2021.
  29. W. Wen, S. Yang, P. Zhou, and S. Gao, “Impacts of COVID-19 on the electric vehicle industry: Evidence from China,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 144, p. 111024, 7 2021.
  30. P. Ashkrof, G. Homem de Almeida Correia, and B. van Arem, “Analysis of the effect of charging needs on battery electric vehicle drivers’ route choice behaviour: A case study in the Netherlands,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 78, p. 102206, 1 2020.
  31. A. Donkers, D. Yang, and M. Viktorović, “Influence of driving style, infrastructure, weather and traffic on electric vehicle performance,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 88, p. 102569, 11 2020.
  32. X. Hao, H. Wang, Z. Lin, and M. Ouyang, “Seasonal effects on electric vehicle energy consumption and driving range: A case study on personal, taxi, and ridesharing vehicles,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 249, p. 119403, 3 2020.
  33. https://www.tudelft.nl/dhpc/ark:/44463/DelftBluePhase1.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Nanda Kishor Panda (6 papers)
  2. Simon H. Tindemans (30 papers)
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.