2000 character limit reached
Observer-Based Environment Robust Control Barrier Functions for Safety-critical Control with Dynamic Obstacles (2403.13288v1)
Published 20 Mar 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY
Abstract: This paper proposes a safety-critical controller for dynamic and uncertain environments, leveraging a robust environment control barrier function (ECBF) to enhance the robustness against the measurement and prediction uncertainties associated with moving obstacles. The approach reduces conservatism, compared with a worst-case uncertainty approach, by incorporating a state observer for obstacles into the ECBF design. The controller, which guarantees safety, is achieved through solving a quadratic programming problem. The proposed method's effectiveness is demonstrated via a dynamic obstacle-avoidance problem for an autonomous vehicle, including comparisons with established baseline approaches.
- A. D. Ames, X. Xu, J.W. Grizzle, and P. Tabuada, “Control barrier function based quadratic programs for safety critical systems,” IEEE Transanctions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 3861–3876, 2016.
- A. D. Ames, S. Coogan, M. Egerstedt, G. Notomista, K. Sreenath, and P. Tabuada, “Control barrier functions: Theory and applications,” European Control Conference (ECC), pp. 3420–3431, IEEE, 2019.
- M. Igarashi, I. Tezuka, and H. Nakamura, “Time-varying control barrier function and its application to environment-adaptive human assist control,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, no. 16, pp. 735–740, 2019.
- B. Chalaki, and A. A. Malikopoulos, “A barrier-certified optimal coordination framework for connected and automated vehicles,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp. 2264–2269, 2022.
- S. He, J. Zheng, B. Zhang, and K. Sreenath, “Rule-based safety-critical control design using control barrier functions with application to autonomous lane change,” American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 178–185, IEEE, 2021.
- G. Wu, and K. Sreenath, “Safety-critical control of a 3D quadrotor with range-limited sensing,” Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, vol. 50695, pp. V001T05A006, 2016.
- T. G. Molnar, A. K. Kiss, A. D. Ames, and G. Orosz, “Safety-critical control with input delay in dynamic environment,” IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1507–1520, 2023.
- V. Hamdipoor, N. Meskin, C. G. Cassandras, “Safe control synthesis using environmentally robust control barrier functions,” European Journal of Control, pp. 100840, 2023.
- A. Alan, A. J. Taylor, C. R. He, G. Orosz and A. D. Ames, “Safe controller synthesis with tunable input-to-state safe control barrier functions,” IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 6, pp. 908–913, 2021.
- D. R. Agrawal, and D. Panagou, “Safe and robust observer-controller synthesis using control barrier functions,” IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 7, pp. 127–132, 2022.
- W. Jeon, A. Zemouche, and R. Rajamani, “Tracking of vehicle motion on highways and urban roads using a nonlinear observer,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 644–655, 2019.
- J. Zhou, B. Olofsson, and E. Frisk, “Interaction-aware motion planning for autonomous vehicles with multi-modal obstacle uncertainty predictions,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1305–1319, 2024.
- A. Zemouche, M. Boutayeb, and G. I. Bara, “Observers for a class of Lipschitz systems with extension to H∞subscript𝐻H_{\infty}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT performance analysis,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2008.
- J. Löfberg, “YALMIP: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2004, pp. 284–289.