Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Hybrid Unsupervised Learning Strategy for Monitoring Industrial Batch Processes (2403.13032v2)

Published 19 Mar 2024 in cs.LG, cs.SY, eess.SP, and eess.SY

Abstract: Industrial production processes, especially in the pharmaceutical industry, are complex systems that require continuous monitoring to ensure efficiency, product quality, and safety. This paper presents a hybrid unsupervised learning strategy (HULS) for monitoring complex industrial processes. Addressing the limitations of traditional Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs), especially in scenarios with unbalanced data sets and highly correlated process variables, HULS combines existing unsupervised learning techniques to address these challenges. To evaluate the performance of the HULS concept, comparative experiments are performed based on a laboratory batch

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. Self-organizing feature maps for modeling and control of robotic manipulators. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 36, 407–450.
  2. Self-organizing maps: ordering, convergence properties and energy functions. Biological Cybernetics, 67, 47–55.
  3. Frey, C.W. (2023). A hybrid unsupervised learning strategy for monitoring complex industrial manufacturing processes. IECON 2023- 49th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 1–8.
  4. Frey, C.W. (2008). Monitoring of complex industrial processes based on self-organizing maps and watershed transformations. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 1041–1046.
  5. Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21, 1263–1284.
  6. Condition monitoring of a complex hydraulic system using multivariate statistics. 2015 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings, 210–215.
  7. An instantaneous topological mapping model for correlated stimuli. IJCNN’99. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36339), 1, 529–534 vol.1.
  8. Kohonen, T. (2013). Essentials of the self-organizing map. Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society, 37, 52–65.
  9. Krawczyk, B. (2016). Learning from imbalanced data: open challenges and future directions. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 221–232.
  10. Anomaly detection via self-organizing map. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 974–978.
  11. Ruppert, D. (2004). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 567 – 567.
  12. Anomaly detection in time series: A comprehensive evaluation. Proc. VLDB Endow., 15, 1779–1797.
  13. Kohonen’s self-organizing feature maps for exploratory data analysis. In Proceedings of the International Neural Network Conference (INNC’90).
  14. The use of kohonen self-organizing maps in process monitoring. Proceedings First International IEEE Symposium Intelligent Systems, 3, 2–7 vol.3.
  15. Watersheds in digital spaces: An efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 13, 583–598.
  16. Using self-organizing maps to learn hybrid timed automata in absence of discrete events. 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), 1–8.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets