Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

PAME: Self-Supervised Masked Autoencoder for No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment (2403.10061v1)

Published 15 Mar 2024 in cs.CV and cs.MM

Abstract: No-reference point cloud quality assessment (NR-PCQA) aims to automatically predict the perceptual quality of point clouds without reference, which has achieved remarkable performance due to the utilization of deep learning-based models. However, these data-driven models suffer from the scarcity of labeled data and perform unsatisfactorily in cross-dataset evaluations. To address this problem, we propose a self-supervised pre-training framework using masked autoencoders (PAME) to help the model learn useful representations without labels. Specifically, after projecting point clouds into images, our PAME employs dual-branch autoencoders, reconstructing masked patches from distorted images into the original patches within reference and distorted images. In this manner, the two branches can separately learn content-aware features and distortion-aware features from the projected images. Furthermore, in the model fine-tuning stage, the learned content-aware features serve as a guide to fuse the point cloud quality features extracted from different perspectives. Extensive experiments show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art NR-PCQA methods on popular benchmarks in terms of prediction accuracy and generalizability.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. “Improving point cloud quality metrics with noticeable possibility maps,” in ICME, 2023, pp. 360–365.
  2. “Blind quality assessment of 3d dense point clouds with structure guided resampling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.14603, 2022.
  3. “Representation learning optimization for 3d point cloud quality assessment without reference,” in ICIP, 2022, pp. 3702–3706.
  4. “Gpa-net: No-reference point cloud quality assessment with multi-task graph convolutional network,” IEEE TVCG, 2023.
  5. “Pcqa-graphpoint: Efficient deep-based graph metric for point cloud quality assessment,” in ICASSP, 2023, pp. 1–5.
  6. “No-reference point cloud quality assessment via weighted patch quality prediction,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07829, 2023.
  7. “ψ𝜓\psiitalic_ψ-net: Point structural information network for no-reference point cloud quality assessment,” in ICASSP, 2023, pp. 1–5.
  8. “Point cloud quality assessment: Dataset construction and learning-based no-reference metric,” ACM TOMM, vol. 19, no. 2s, pp. 1–26, 2023.
  9. “A no-reference quality assessment metric for point cloud based on captured video sequences,” in MMSP, 2022, pp. 1–5.
  10. “Pqa-net: Deep no reference point cloud quality assessment via multi-view projection,” IEEE TCSVT, pp. 4645–4660, 2021.
  11. “Point cloud projection and multi-scale feature fusion network based blind quality assessment for colored point clouds,” in ACMMM, 2021, pp. 5266–5272.
  12. “Multi-view aggregation transformer for no-reference point cloud quality assessment,” Displays, vol. 78, pp. 102450, 2023.
  13. “No-reference point cloud quality assessment via domain adaptation,” in CVPR, 2022, pp. 21179–21188.
  14. “Mm-pcqa: Multi-modal learning for no-reference point cloud quality assessment,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.00244, 2022.
  15. “Perceptual quality assessment of colored 3d point clouds,” IEEE TVCG, 2022.
  16. “Predicting the perceptual quality of point cloud: A 3d-to-2d projection-based exploration,” IEEE TMM, vol. 23, pp. 3877–3891, 2020.
  17. “Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners,” in CVPR, 2022, pp. 16000–16009.
  18. “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  19. “Hallucinated-iqa: No-reference image quality assessment via adversarial learning,” in CVPR, 2018, pp. 732–741.
  20. “A deep learning based no-reference quality assessment model for ugc videos,” in ACMMM, 2022, pp. 856–865.
  21. “A novel methodology for quality assessment of voxelized point clouds,” in XLI, 2018, vol. 10752, pp. 174–190.
  22. “Towards a point cloud structural similarity metric,” in ICMEW, 2020, pp. 1–6.
  23. “Pcqm: A full-reference quality metric for colored 3d point clouds,” in QoMEX, 2020, pp. 1–6.
  24. “Inferring point cloud quality via graph similarity,” IEEE TPAMI, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 3015–3029, 2020.
  25. “Ms-graphsim: Inferring point cloud quality via multiscale graph similarity,” in ACMMM, 2021, pp. 1230–1238.
  26. “Mped: Quantifying point cloud distortion based on multiscale potential energy discrepancy,” IEEE TPAMI, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 6037–6054, 2022.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com