Randomized Principal Component Analysis for Hyperspectral Image Classification (2403.09117v2)
Abstract: The high-dimensional feature space of the hyperspectral imagery poses major challenges to the processing and analysis of the hyperspectral data sets. In such a case, dimensionality reduction is necessary to decrease the computational complexity. The random projections open up new ways of dimensionality reduction, especially for large data sets. In this paper, the principal component analysis (PCA) and randomized principal component analysis (R-PCA) for the classification of hyperspectral images using support vector machines (SVM) and light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM) have been investigated. In this experimental research, the number of features was reduced to 20 and 30 for classification of two hyperspectral datasets (Indian Pines and Pavia University). The experimental results demonstrated that PCA outperformed R-PCA for SVM for both datasets, but received close accuracy values for LightGBM. The highest classification accuracies were obtained as 0.9925 and 0.9639 by LightGBM with original features for the Pavia University and Indian Pines, respectively.
- “Feature mining for hyperspectral image classification,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 676–697, 2013.
- “Recent advances on spectral–spatial hyperspectral image classification: An overview and new guidelines,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1579–1597, 2018.
- “Feature extraction for hyperspectral imagery: The evolution from shallow to deep: Overview and toolbox,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 60–88, 2020.
- Md. A. Mamun Md. P. Uddin and Md. A. Hossain, “Pca-based feature reduction for hyperspectral remote sensing image classification,” IETE Technical Review, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 377–396, 2021.
- “Advances in hyperspectral image and signal processing: A comprehensive overview of the state of the art,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 37–78, 2017.
- “Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral images of vegetation and crops based on self-organized maps,” Information Processing in Agriculture, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 310–327, 2021.
- “Advances in hyperspectral image classification: Earth monitoring with statistical learning methods,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 2014.
- “Crop stage classification of hyperspectral data using unsupervised techniques,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 861–866, 2013.
- “Finding structure with randomness: Probabilistic algorithms for constructing approximate matrix decompositions,” SIAM Review, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 217–288, 2011.
- “Projecting ”better than randomly”: How to reduce the dimensionality of very large datasets in a way that outperforms random projections,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), 2016, pp. 184–193.
- “Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images using different dimension reduction methods with 3d/2d cnn,” Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, vol. 25, pp. 100694, 2022.
- “Deep supervised learning for hyperspectral data classification through convolutional neural networks,” in 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2015, pp. 4959–4962.
- “Learning sensor-specific spatial-spectral features of hyperspectral images via convolutional neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 4520–4533, 2017.
- “Diverse region-based cnn for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2623–2634, 2018.
- “Deep few-shot learning for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2290–2304, 2019.
- “Randomized nonlinear component analysis for dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral images,” in 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2017, pp. 5–8.
- Grupo de Inteligencia Computacional, “Hyperspectral remote sensing scenes,” http://www.ehu.eus/ccwintco/index.php/Hyperspectral_Remote_Sensing_Scenes/, 2021, Accessed: 2023-11-10.
- “Multiscale 2-d singular spectrum analysis and principal component analysis for spatial–spectral noise-robust feature extraction and classification of hyperspectral images,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 14, pp. 1233–1245, 2021.
- “Spectral–spatial classification of hyperspectral imagery with 3d convolutional neural network,” Remote Sensing, vol. 9, no. 1, 2017.
- “Advanced spectral classifiers for hyperspectral images: A review,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8–32, 2017.
- J.A. Gualtieri and S. Chettri, “Support vector machines for classification of hyperspectral data,” in IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Taking the Pulse of the Planet: The Role of Remote Sensing in Managing the Environment. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37120), 2000, vol. 2, pp. 813–815 vol.2.
- G. Camps-Valls and L. Bruzzone, “Kernel-based methods for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1351–1362, 2005.
- M. Pal and P. M. Mather, “Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1007–1011, 2005.
- “Svm-based hyperspectral image classification using intrinsic dimension,” Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 8, pp. 477–487, 2015.
- “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 12, no. 85, pp. 2825–2830, 2011.
- “Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, Eds. 2017, vol. 30, Curran Associates, Inc.
- “Bagging and boosting ensemble classifiers for classification of multispectral, hyperspectral and polsar data: A comparative evaluation,” Remote Sensing, vol. 13, no. 21, 2021.