Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
162 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Cultural evolution in populations of Large Language Models (2403.08882v1)

Published 13 Mar 2024 in cs.MA, cs.AI, and q-bio.PE

Abstract: Research in cultural evolution aims at providing causal explanations for the change of culture over time. Over the past decades, this field has generated an important body of knowledge, using experimental, historical, and computational methods. While computational models have been very successful at generating testable hypotheses about the effects of several factors, such as population structure or transmission biases, some phenomena have so far been more complex to capture using agent-based and formal models. This is in particular the case for the effect of the transformations of social information induced by evolved cognitive mechanisms. We here propose that leveraging the capacity of LLMs to mimic human behavior may be fruitful to address this gap. On top of being an useful approximation of human cultural dynamics, multi-agents models featuring generative agents are also important to study for their own sake. Indeed, as artificial agents are bound to participate more and more to the evolution of culture, it is crucial to better understand the dynamics of machine-generated cultural evolution. We here present a framework for simulating cultural evolution in populations of LLMs, allowing the manipulation of variables known to be important in cultural evolution, such as network structure, personality, and the way social information is aggregated and transformed. The software we developed for conducting these simulations is open-source and features an intuitive user-interface, which we hope will help to build bridges between the fields of cultural evolution and generative artificial intelligence.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (49)
  1. Culture without copying or selection. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 3:e50, January 2021. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Large language models show human-like content biases in transmission chain experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(44):e2313790120, October 2023.
  3. Which humans?, Sep 2023.
  4. The ecology of religious beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(47):16784–16789, 2014.
  5. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, June 1988. Google-Books-ID: MBg4oBsCKU8C.
  6. Machine culture. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(11):1855–1868, November 2023. Number: 11 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  7. Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton University Press, May 1981. Google-Books-ID: FDfBDwAAQBAJ.
  8. How Darwinian is cultural evolution? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1642):20130368, May 2014. Publisher: Royal Society.
  9. Cultural evolution of systematically structured behaviour in a non-human primate. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society, 281, December 2014.
  10. Greater than the sum of its parts? Modelling population contact and interaction of cultural repertoires. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 14(130):20170171, May 2017. Publisher: Royal Society.
  11. Partial connectivity increases cultural accumulation within groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(11):2982–2987, March 2016. Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  12. Divide and conquer: intermediate levels of population fragmentation maximize cultural accumulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1743):20170062, February 2018. Publisher: Royal Society.
  13. Why imaginary worlds? The psychological foundations and cultural evolution of fictions with imaginary worlds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45:e276, January 2022.
  14. De novo establishment of wild-type song culture in the zebra finch. Nature, 459(7246):564–568, May 2009.
  15. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using networkx. Technical report, Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), 2008.
  16. 2 - Getting to Know Your Data. In Jiawei Han, Micheline Kamber, and Jian Pei, editors, Data Mining (Third Edition), The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems, pages 39–82. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, January 2012.
  17. Joseph Henrich. Demography and Cultural Evolution: How Adaptive Cultural Processes Can Produce Maladaptive Losses—The Tasmanian Case. American Antiquity, 69(2):197–214, April 2004.
  18. Joseph Henrich. The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter. In The Secret of Our Success. Princeton University Press, October 2015.
  19. E. Tory Higgins. Culture and Personality: Variability across Universal Motives as the Missing Link. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2):608–634, 2008. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00075.x.
  20. Divergent semantic integration (DSI): Extracting creativity from narratives with distributional semantic modeling. Behavior Research Methods, 55(7):3726–3759, October 2023.
  21. Iterated learning: Intergenerational knowledge transmission reveals inductive biases. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2):288–294, 2007. Place: US Publisher: Psychonomic Society.
  22. The predictable evolution of letter shapes: An emergent script of West Africa recapitulates historical change in writing systems. February 2024. Publisher: OSF.
  23. Yoed N Kenett. What can quantitative measures of semantic distance tell us about creativity? Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27:11–16, June 2019.
  24. Evolution in leaps: The punctuated accumulation and loss of cultural innovations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(49):E6762–E6769, December 2015. Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  25. Stick to your role! stability of personal values expressed in large language models, 2024.
  26. The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(4):667–694, December 2007. Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
  27. Transmission fidelity is the key to the build-up of cumulative culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1599):2171–2180, August 2012.
  28. Mistralorca: Mistral-7b model instruct-tuned on filtered openorcav1 gpt-4 dataset. https://huggingface.co/Open-Orca/Mistral-7B-OpenOrca, 2023.
  29. Steven Loria. textblob documentation. Release 0.15, 2, 2018.
  30. Alex Mesoudi. Cultural selection and biased transformation: two dynamics of cultural evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376, May 2021.
  31. Helena Miton. Cultural Attraction. February 2024. Publisher: OSF.
  32. Universal cognitive mechanisms explain the cultural success of bloodletting. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(4):303–312, 2015. Place: Netherlands Publisher: Elsevier Science.
  33. Motor constraints influence cultural evolution of rhythm. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1937):20202001, October 2020. Publisher: Royal Society.
  34. Innovation and cumulative culture through tweaks and leaps in online programming contests. Nature Communications, 9(1):2321, June 2018. Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  35. Joel Mokyr. Punctuated Equilibria and Technological Progress. The American Economic Review, 80(2):350–354, 1990. Publisher: American Economic Association.
  36. Olivier Morin. How Traditions Live and Die. Oxford University Press, 2016. Google-Books-ID: kSukCgAAQBAJ.
  37. Social Network Structure Shapes Innovation: Experience-sharing in RL with SAPIENS, November 2022. arXiv:2206.05060 [cs].
  38. Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior, August 2023. arXiv:2304.03442 [cs].
  39. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. Journal of machine learning research, 12(Oct):2825–2830, 2011.
  40. Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. University of Chicago Press, June 2008.
  41. ‘Our Roots Run Deep’: Historical Myths as Culturally Evolved Technologies for Coalitional Recruitment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, pages 1–44, January 2024. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
  42. Niche diversity can explain cross-cultural differences in personality structure. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(12):1276–1283, December 2019. Number: 12 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  43. Dan Sperber. Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1996.
  44. Phylogenetics Meets Folklore: Bioinformatics Approaches to the Study of International Folktales. In Ralph Kenna, Máirín MacCarron, and Pádraig MacCarron, editors, Maths Meets Myths: Quantitative Approaches to Ancient Narratives, Understanding Complex Systems, pages 91–114. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017.
  45. Human biases limit cumulative innovation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 288(1946):20202752, March 2021. Publisher: Royal Society.
  46. Punctuated equilibrium in the large-scale evolution of programming languages†. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 12(107):20150249, June 2015. Publisher: Royal Society.
  47. Generative agent-based modeling with actions grounded in physical, social, or digital space using Concordia, December 2023. arXiv:2312.03664 [cs] version: 2.
  48. Duncan J. Watts. Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2):493–527, September 1999.
  49. BigScience Workshop. BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model, June 2023. arXiv:2211.05100 [cs].
Citations (8)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel simulation framework using LLMs to model cultural evolution across agent networks by integrating transformation prompts and diverse personalities.
  • It employs similarity metrics and visualization tools to quantify iterative changes and illustrate dynamic processes in the transmission of cultural information.
  • Preliminary findings reveal that network structure and agent traits significantly influence cultural stability and variation, offering actionable insights for cross-disciplinary research.

Exploring Cultural Evolution in Populations of LLMs

Introduction to the Framework

The paper of cultural evolution has profoundly enhanced our understanding of how cultures transform over time. Recent advancements in computational modeling have opened new avenues for exploring these dynamic changes. In particular, the use of LLMs presents a novel method for simulating cultural evolution, extending our capacity to model complex transformations of social information. The paper introduces an innovative framework for simulating cultural evolution within populations of LLMs, focusing on variables central to cultural transformation such as network structure, agent personality, and information aggregation and transformation processes.

Methodological Foundation

The Simulation Model

The introduced framework utilizes LLMs to simulate the transmission and evolution of stories across generations of agents within a specified network structure. Agents, acting as independent LLM instances, participate in generating initial stories and then transmitting these stories through the network, subject to transformations based on preset prompts and agent personalities. This setup allows for a detailed examination of cultural dynamics within the network, leveraging the LLMs’ capacity to mimic human-like processing of cultural information.

Analytical Approach

Two primary analytical tools are deployed within this framework:

  1. Similarity Metrics: The use of similarity metrics facilitates a quantitative understanding of the iterative changes in stories as they circulate within the agent network. These metrics provide insights into the stability of cultural information and its evolution over time.
  2. Visualizations: Complementary to similarity metrics, a variety of visualization tools are implemented, including similarity matrices and word chains. These visualizations offer qualitative insights into the patterns of cultural evolution, highlighting pathways of information transformation and the emergence of stable cultural elements.

Insights from Preliminary Results

Impact of Network Structure

Initial findings underscore the significant influence of network structure on cultural dynamics. For instance, fully-connected networks demonstrate a rapid homogenization of cultural content, contrasting with the more gradual processes observed in circle or caveman network structures. These results align with existing literature suggesting that network configuration crucially shapes information dissemination and cultural diversity.

Role of Transformation Prompts

The type of transformation prompts given to agents substantially affects the trajectory of cultural evolution. Prompts encouraging repetition led to higher similarity and stability of content over generations, while those prompting for diversity fostered greater cultural variation. This aspect of the model highlights the potential of LLMs to explore how different modes of cultural transmission impact the evolution of cultures.

Influence of Agent Personalities

The incorporation of agent personalities provides further depth to the simulation of cultural dynamics. Diverse personalities among agents lead to varied approaches to story generation and transformation, reflecting the complex interplay between individual differences and cultural evolution. Preliminary results suggest that populations with a mix of creative and non-creative agents exhibit dynamic patterns of cultural change, emphasizing the role of agent diversity in cultural evolution models.

Concluding Thoughts and Future Directions

The development of a framework for simulating cultural evolution using LLMs offers a promising avenue for bridging the fields of cultural evolution and generative AI. Preliminary results provide valuable insights into the factors influencing cultural dynamics and demonstrate the potential of LLMs to model complex processes of cultural change. Future research could expand on these initial findings by exploring a broader range of network structures, transformation prompts, and agent personalities, as well as examining the applicability of these models to real-world scenarios of cultural evolution.

Adopting this innovative approach paves the way for more sophisticated simulations of cultural dynamics, offering a rich ground for cross-disciplinary research and a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying cultural evolution. The open-source availability of the software developed for these simulations further encourages collaboration and experimentation within the scientific community, potentially leading to new discoveries in the field of cultural evolution and beyond.