Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Spatial Latent Gaussian Modelling with Change of Support (2403.08514v1)

Published 13 Mar 2024 in stat.ME

Abstract: Spatial data are often derived from multiple sources (e.g. satellites, in-situ sensors, survey samples) with different supports, but associated with the same properties of a spatial phenomenon of interest. It is common for predictors to also be measured on different spatial supports than the response variables. Although there is no standard way to work with spatial data with different supports, a prevalent approach used by practitioners has been to use downscaling or interpolation to project all the variables of analysis towards a common support, and then using standard spatial models. The main disadvantage with this approach is that simple interpolation can introduce biases and, more importantly, the uncertainty associated with the change of support is not taken into account in parameter estimation. In this article, we propose a Bayesian spatial latent Gaussian model that can handle data with different rectilinear supports in both the response variable and predictors. Our approach allows to handle changes of support more naturally according to the properties of the spatial stochastic process being used, and to take into account the uncertainty from the change of support in parameter estimation and prediction. We use spatial stochastic processes as linear combinations of basis functions where Gaussian Markov random fields define the weights. Our hierarchical modelling approach can be described by the following steps: (i) define a latent model where response variables and predictors are considered as latent stochastic processes with continuous support, (ii) link the continuous-index set stochastic processes with its projection to the support of the observed data, (iii) link the projected process with the observed data. We show the applicability of our approach by simulation studies and modelling land suitability for improved grassland in Rhondda Cynon Taf, a county borough in Wales.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. Advances in mapping malaria for elimination: Fine resolution modelling of Plasmodium falciparum incidence. Scientific Reports, 6.
  2. Bayesian Spatial Change of Support for Count-Valued Survey Data With Application to the American Community Survey. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(514):472–487.
  3. Agent-based modeling of alternative futures in the british land use system. Earth’s Future, 10(11):e2022EF002905.
  4. A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils. Water resources research, 20(6):682–690.
  5. Reparameterized and Marginalized Posterior and Predictive Sampling for Complex Bayesian Geostatistical Models. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 18(2):262–282.
  6. de Boor, C. (2001). A Practical Guide to Splines. Springer New York.
  7. Model-Based Geostatistics. Springer.
  8. A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography, 25(5):626–640.
  9. FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISS-CAS/JRC (2012). Harmonized world soil database (version 1.2).
  10. Bayesian hierarchical models for spatially misaligned data in R. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5(6):514–523.
  11. On the change of support problem for spatio-temporal data. Biostatistics, 2(1):31–45.
  12. Combining Incompatible Spatial Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(458):632–648.
  13. Land suitability analysis using multi attributedecision making approach. International journal of environmental science and development, 1(5):441.
  14. Kyriakidis, P. C. (2004). A Geostatistical Framework for Area-to-Point Spatial Interpolation. Geographical Analysis, 36(3):259–289.
  15. Variational Learning on Aggregate Outputs with Gaussian Processes. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 31. Curran Associates, Inc.
  16. Delivering spatially comparable inference on the risks of multiple severities of respiratory disease from spatially misaligned disease count data. Biometrics, n/a(n/a).
  17. Accounting for change of support in spatial accuracy assessment of modelled soil mineral phosphorous concentration. Geoderma, 130(3):368–386.
  18. An explicit link between gaussian fields and gaussian markov random fields: The stochastic partial differential equation approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Statistical Methodology, 73(4):423–498.
  19. Spatio-Temporal data fusion for massive sea surface temperature data from MODIS and AMSR-E instruments. Environmetrics, 31(2):e2594.
  20. A geostatistical model for combined analysis of point-level and area-level data using INLA and SPDE. Spatial Statistics, 21:27–41.
  21. Land cover map 2017 (25m rasterised land parcels, gb).
  22. Resolving misaligned spatial data with integrated species distribution models. Ecology, 100(6):e02709.
  23. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press.
  24. A spectral method for spatial downscaling. Biometrics, 70(4):932–942.
  25. Climate hydrology and ecology research support system meteorology dataset for great britain (1961-2019)[chess-met].
  26. Climate hydrology and ecology research support system potential evapotranspiration dataset for great britain (1961-2019)[chess-pe].
  27. Trends in atmospheric evaporative demand in great britain using high-resolution meteorological data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(2):1189–1224.
  28. Gaussian Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications. CRC Press.
  29. Continuous inference for aggregated point process data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 181(4):1125–1150.
  30. Bayesian Inference and Data Augmentation Schemes for Spatial, Spatiotemporal and Multivariate Log-Gaussian Cox Processes in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 63(7):1–48.
  31. Generalized spatial fusion model framework for joint analysis of point and areal data. Spatial Statistics, 23:72–90.
  32. Wang, F. (1994). The use of artificial neural networks in a geographical information system for agricultural land-suitability assessment. Environment and planning A, 26(2):265–284.
  33. Assessing Uncertainty in Support-Adjusted Spatial Misalignment Problems. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 38(16-17):3249–3264.
  34. Hierarchical regression with misaligned spatial data: Relating ambient ozone and pediatric asthma ER visits in Atlanta. Environmetrics, 14(5):537–557.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com