Optimal Design and Implementation of an Open-source Emulation Platform for User-Centric Shared E-mobility Services (2403.07964v2)
Abstract: With the rising concern over transportation emissions and pollution on a global scale, shared electric mobility services like E-cars, E-bikes, and E-scooters have emerged as promising solutions to mitigate these pressing challenges. However, existing shared E-mobility services exhibit critical design deficiencies, including insufficient service integration, imprecise energy consumption forecasting, limited scalability and geographical coverage, and a notable absence of a user-centric perspective, particularly in the context of multi-modal transportation. More importantly, there is no consolidated open-source platform which could benefit the E-mobility research community. This paper aims to bridge this gap by providing an open-source platform for shared E-mobility. The proposed platform, with an agent-in-the-loop approach and modular architecture, is tailored to diverse user preferences and offers enhanced customization. We demonstrate the viability of this platform by providing a comprehensive analysis for integrated multi-modal route-optimization in diverse scenarios of energy availability, user preferences and E-mobility tools placement for which we use modified Ant Colony Optimization algorithm so called Multi-Model Energy Constrained ACO (MMEC-ACO) and Q-Learning algorithms. Our findings demonstrate that Q-learning achieves significantly better performance in terms of travel time cost for more than 90\% of the instances as compared to MMEC-ACO for different scenarios including energy availability, user preference and E-mobility tools distribution. For a fixed (O, D) pair, the average execution time to achieve optimal time cost solution for MMEC-ACO is less than 2 seconds, while Q-learning reaches an optimal time cost in 20 seconds on average. For a run-time of 2 seconds, Q-learning still achieves a better optimal time cost with a 20\% reduction over MMEC-ACO's time cost.
- S. Alataş, “Do environmental technologies help to reduce transport sector co2 emissions? evidence from the eu15 countries,” Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 91, p. 101047, 2022, decarbonising transport. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885921000196
- I. energy agency. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics
- D. Godil, Z. Yu, A. Sharif, R. Usman, and S. Khan, “Investigate the role of technology innovation and renewable energy in reducing transport sector co 2 emission in china: A path toward sustainable development,” Sustainable Development, vol. 29, 02 2021.
- M. Liu, “Fed-bev: A federated learning framework for modelling energy consumption of battery electric vehicles,” in 2021 IEEE 94th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Fall), 2021, pp. 1–7.
- bbva. [Online]. Available: https://www.bbva.ch/en/news/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-electric-mobility/
- G. Dias, E. Arsenio, and P. Ribeiro, “The role of shared e-scooter systems in urban sustainability and resilience during the covid-19 mobility restrictions,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 13, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7084
- A. Nikitas, S. Tsigdinos, C. Karolemeas, E. Kourmpa, and E. Bakogiannis, “Cycling in the era of covid-19: Lessons learnt and best practice policy recommendations for a more bike-centric future,” Sustainability, vol. 13, p. 4620, 04 2021.
- F. Liao and G. Correia, “Electric carsharing and micromobility: A literature review on their usage pattern, demand, and potential impacts,” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 269–286, 2022.
- K.-S. Cho, S.-W. Park, and S.-Y. Son, “Digital twin-based simulation platform with integrated e-mobility and distribution system,” in CIRED Porto Workshop 2022: E-mobility and power distribution systems, vol. 2022. IET, 2022, pp. 1158–1162.
- M. Ferrara, B. Monechi, G. Valenti, C. Liberto, M. Nigro, and I. Biazzo, “A simulation tool for energy management of e-mobility in urban areas,” in 2019 6th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–7.
- D. Echternacht, I. El Haouati, R. Schermuly, and F. Meyer, “Simulating the impact of e-mobility charging infrastructure on urban low-voltage networks,” in NEIS 2018; Conference on Sustainable Energy Supply and Energy Storage Systems. VDE, 2018, pp. 1–6.
- T. Campisi, N. Ali, K. D. Alemdar, Ö. Kaya, M. Y. Çodur, and G. Tesoriere, “Promotion of e-mobility and its main share market: Some considerations about e-shared mobility,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2611, no. 1. AIP Publishing LLC, 2022, p. 060002.
- K. Laurischkat, A. Viertelhausen, and D. Jandt, “Business models for electric mobility,” Procedia Cirp, vol. 47, pp. 483–488, 2016.
- M. Luo, B. Du, K. Klemmer, H. Zhu, and H. Wen, “Deployment optimization for shared e-mobility systems with multi-agent deep neural search,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 2549–2560, 2021.
- M. Luo, B. Du, W. Zhang, T. Song, K. Li, H. Zhu, M. Birkin, and H. Wen, “Fleet rebalancing for expanding shared e-mobility systems: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023.
- T. Duraisamy and D. Kaliyaperumal, “Adaptive passive balancing in battery management system for e‐mobility,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 45, 02 2021.
- Y. Chen, G. Wu, R. Sun, A. Dubey, A. Laszka, and P. Pugliese, “A review and outlook on energy consumption estimation models for electric vehicles,” SAE International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Energy, Environment, & Policy, vol. 2, 03 2021.
- Moovit. [Online]. Available: https://moovitapp.com/sf_bay_area_ca-22/poi/en-gb
- Bird. [Online]. Available: https://www.bird.co/
- ElectricFeel. [Online]. Available: https://www.electricfeel.com/
- W. Mobility. [Online]. Available: https://www.wundermobility.com/
- T. Buchmann, P. Wolf, and S. Fidaschek, “Stimulating e-mobility diffusion in germany (emosim): An agent-based simulation approach,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 656, 2021.
- C. Wu, A. Kreidieh, K. Parvate, E. Vinitsky, and A. M. Bayen, “Flow: Architecture and benchmarking for reinforcement learning in traffic control,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.05465, vol. 10, 2017.
- J. Barceló and J. Casas, “Dynamic network simulation with aimsun,” Simulation approaches in transportation analysis: Recent advances and challenges, pp. 57–98, 2005.
- M. Fellendorf and P. Vortisch, “Microscopic traffic flow simulator vissim,” Fundamentals of traffic simulation, pp. 63–93, 2010.
- D. Krajzewicz, G. Hertkorn, C. Rössel, and P. Wagner, “Sumo (simulation of urban mobility)-an open-source traffic simulation,” in Proceedings of the 4th middle East Symposium on Simulation and Modelling (MESM20002), 2002, pp. 183–187.
- E. Burani, G. Cabri, and M. Leoncini, “An algorithm to predict e-bike power consumption based on planned routes,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 1105, Mar. 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/electronics11071105
- M. Liu, J. Naoum-Sawaya, Y. Gu, F. Lecue, and R. Shorten, “A distributed markovian parking assist system,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 2230–2240, 2019.