Crafting Knowledge: Exploring the Creative Mechanisms of Chat-Based Search Engines (2402.19421v1)
Abstract: In the domain of digital information dissemination, search engines act as pivotal conduits linking information seekers with providers. The advent of chat-based search engines utilizing LLMs and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), exemplified by Bing Chat, marks an evolutionary leap in the search ecosystem. They demonstrate metacognitive abilities in interpreting web information and crafting responses with human-like understanding and creativity. Nonetheless, the intricate nature of LLMs renders their "cognitive" processes opaque, challenging even their designers' understanding. This research aims to dissect the mechanisms through which an LLM-powered chat-based search engine, specifically Bing Chat, selects information sources for its responses. To this end, an extensive dataset has been compiled through engagements with New Bing, documenting the websites it cites alongside those listed by the conventional search engine. Employing NLP techniques, the research reveals that Bing Chat exhibits a preference for content that is not only readable and formally structured, but also demonstrates lower perplexity levels, indicating a unique inclination towards text that is predictable by the underlying LLM. Further enriching our analysis, we procure an additional dataset through interactions with the GPT-4 based knowledge retrieval API, unveiling a congruent text preference between the RAG API and Bing Chat. This consensus suggests that these text preferences intrinsically emerge from the underlying LLMs, rather than being explicitly crafted by Bing Chat's developers. Moreover, our investigation documents a greater similarity among websites cited by RAG technologies compared to those ranked highest by conventional search engines.
- Abhishek V, Hosanagar K (2013) Optimal bidding in multi-item multislot sponsored search auctions. Operations Research 61(4):855–873.
- Athey S, Ellison G (2011) Position auctions with consumer search. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(3):1213–1270.
- Berman R, Katona Z (2013) The role of search engine optimization in search marketing. Marketing Science 32(4):644–651.
- Borwankar S, Khern-am nuai W (2023) Unraveling the impact: An empirical investigation of chatgpt’s exclusion from stack overflow. Available at SSRN 4481959 .
- Chall JS, Dale E (1995) Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula (Brookline Books).
- Ghose A, Yang S (2009) An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: Sponsored search in electronic markets. Management science 55(10):1605–1622.
- Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011) Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Science 30(3):389–404.
- Horton JJ (2023) Large language models as simulated economic agents: What can we learn from homo silicus? Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Johnston WJ, Fusi S (2023) Abstract representations emerge naturally in neural networks trained to perform multiple tasks. Nature Communications 14(1):1040.
- Katona Z, Sarvary M (2010) The race for sponsored links: Bidding patterns for search advertising. Marketing Science 29(2):199–215.
- Kosinski M (2023) Theory of mind may have spontaneously emerged in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02083 .
- Liu J, Toubia O (2018) A semantic approach for estimating consumer content preferences from online search queries. Marketing Science 37(6):930–952.
- Loria S, et al. (2018) textblob documentation. Release 0.15 2(8):269.
- McLuhan M (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (Routledge).
- Rutz OJ, Bucklin RE (2011) From generic to branded: A model of spillover in paid search advertising. Journal of Marketing Research 48(1):87–102.
- Shin W (2015) Keyword search advertising and limited budgets. Marketing Science 34(6):882–896.
- Singhal A, et al. (2001) Modern information retrieval: A brief overview. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 24(4):35–43.
- Lijia Ma (3 papers)
- Xingchen Xu (13 papers)
- Yong Tan (23 papers)