Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

PCR-99: A Practical Method for Point Cloud Registration with 99 Percent Outliers (2402.16598v6)

Published 26 Feb 2024 in cs.CV and cs.RO

Abstract: We propose a robust method for point cloud registration that can handle both unknown scales and extreme outlier ratios. Our method, dubbed PCR-99, uses a deterministic 3-point sampling approach with two novel mechanisms that significantly boost the speed: (1) an improved ordering of the samples based on pairwise scale consistency, prioritizing the point correspondences that are more likely to be inliers, and (2) an efficient outlier rejection scheme based on triplet scale consistency, prescreening bad samples and reducing the number of hypotheses to be tested. Our evaluation shows that, up to 98% outlier ratio, the proposed method achieves comparable performance to the state of the art. At 99% outlier ratio, however, it outperforms the state of the art for both known-scale and unknown-scale problems. Especially for the latter, we observe a clear superiority in terms of robustness and speed.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. B. Curless and M. Levoy, “A volumetric method for building complex models from range images,” in SIGGRAPH.   ACM, 1996, pp. 303–312.
  2. S. H. Lee and J. Civera, “Robust single rotation averaging revisited,” CoRR, abs/2309.05388, 2023.
  3. P. Henry, M. Krainin, E. Herbst, X. Ren, and D. Fox, “RGB-D mapping: Using kinect-style depth cameras for dense 3D modeling of indoor environments,” Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 647–663, 2012.
  4. S. Choi, Q.-Y. Zhou, and V. Koltun, “Robust reconstruction of indoor scenes,” in IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., June 2015.
  5. B. Drost, M. Ulrich, N. Navab, and S. Ilic, “Model globally, match locally: Efficient and robust 3d object recognition,” in IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., 2010, pp. 998–1005.
  6. P. Marion, P. R. Florence, L. Manuelli, and R. Tedrake, “Label Fusion: A pipeline for generating ground truth labels for real RGBD data of cluttered scenes,” in IEEE Intl. Conf. Robot. Automat., 2018, pp. 1–8.
  7. J. Zhang and S. Singh, “LOAM: Lidar odometry and mapping in real-time,” in Proc. Robotics: Science and Systems, 2014.
  8. P. Besl and N. D. McKay, “A method for registration of 3-d shapes,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 239–256, 1992.
  9. R. B. Rusu, N. Blodow, and M. Beetz, “Fast point feature histograms (FPFH) for 3D registration,” in IEEE Intl. Conf. Robot. Automat., 2009, pp. 3212–3217.
  10. A. Parra Bustos and T.-J. Chin, “Guaranteed outlier removal for point cloud registration with correspondences,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2868–2882, 2018.
  11. M. A. Fischler and R. C. Bolles, “Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography,” Commun. ACM, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 381––395, 1981.
  12. O. Chum, J. Matas, and J. Kittler, “Locally optimized RANSAC,” in Pattern Recog., B. Michaelis and G. Krell, Eds., 2003, pp. 236–243.
  13. D. Nister, “Preemptive RANSAC for live structure and motion estimation,” in IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., vol. 1, 2003, pp. 199–206.
  14. A. Parra Bustos, T.-J. Chin, A. Eriksson, H. Li, and D. Suter, “Fast rotation search with stereographic projections for 3(d) registration,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2227–2240, 2016.
  15. H. Yang, J. Shi, and L. Carlone, “Teaser: Fast and certifiable point cloud registration,” IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 314–333, 2020.
  16. L. Sun, “RANSIC: Fast and highly robust estimation for rotation search and point cloud registration using invariant compatibility,” IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 143–150, 2022.
  17. L. Sun and Z. Deng, “A fast and robust rotation search and point cloud registration method for 2d stitching and 3d object localization,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 20, 2021.
  18. E. Hu and L. Sun, “DANIEL: A fast and robust consensus maximization method for point cloud registration with high outlier ratios,” Information Sciences, vol. 614, pp. 563–579, 2022.
  19. ——, “VODRAC: Efficient and robust correspondence-based point cloud registration with extreme outlier ratios,” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 38–55, 2023.
  20. J. Li, P. Shi, Q. Hu, and Y. Zhang, “QGORE: Quadratic-time guaranteed outlier removal for point cloud registration,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2023.
  21. R. Kümmerle, G. Grisetti, H. Strasdat, K. Konolige, and W. Burgard, “g2o: A general framework for graph optimization,” in IEEE Intl. Conf. Robot. Automat., 2011, pp. 3607–3613.
  22. K. MacTavish and T. D. Barfoot, “At all costs: A comparison of robust cost functions for camera correspondence outliers,” in Conf. Comput. Robot. Vis.   IEEE, 2015, pp. 62–69.
  23. H. Yang, P. Antonante, V. Tzoumas, and L. Carlone, “Graduated non-convexity for robust spatial perception: From non-minimal solvers to global outlier rejection,” IEEE Intl. Conf. Robot. Automat., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1127–1134, 2020.
  24. Q.-Y. Zhou, J. Park, and V. Koltun, “Fast global registration,” in Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis., 2016, pp. 766–782.
  25. H. Yang and L. Carlone, “A polynomial-time solution for robust registration with extreme outlier rates,” in Proc. Robotics: Science and Systems, 2019.
  26. J. Shi, H. Yang, and L. Carlone, “ROBIN: a graph-theoretic approach to reject outliers in robust estimation using invariants,” in IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2021, pp. 13 820–13 827.
  27. S. H. Lee and J. Civera, “Robust single rotation averaging,” CoRR, abs/2004.00732, 2020.
  28. L. Sun, “Practical, fast and robust point cloud registration for scene stitching and object localization,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 3962–3978, 2022.
  29. B. K. P. Horn, “Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 629–642, 1987.
  30. L. Sun and L. Deng, “TriVoC: Efficient voting-based consensus maximization for robust point cloud registration with extreme outlier ratios,” IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 4654–4661, 2022.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a deterministic 3-point sampling strategy that prioritizes inlier correspondences using pairwise scale consistency.
  • It implements an efficient outlier rejection mechanism based on triplet scale consistency to reduce computational overhead.
  • PCR-99 demonstrates robust performance on point clouds with up to 99% outliers, setting a new benchmark for challenging 3D registration tasks.

PCR-99: A Deterministic and Efficient Approach for Point Cloud Registration in Extreme Outlier Conditions

Introduction to PCR-99

Point Cloud Registration (PCR) is pivotal in various 3D computer vision applications ranging from autonomous navigation to augmented reality. The PCR-99 algorithm introduces a novel approach aimed at handling extreme outlier conditions with remarkable efficiency. It deploys a deterministic 3-point sampling strategy enhanced by two innovative mechanisms: an improved ordering of samples leveraging pairwise scale consistency and an efficient outlier rejection scheme utilizing triplet scale consistency.

Novel Contributions

PCR-99 distinguishes itself through two primary contributions:

  • Deterministic Sampling with Prioritization: Utilizes a scoring system based on pairwise scale consistency to rank point correspondences. This system inherently prioritizes samples with a higher likelihood of being inliers, thereby enhancing the efficiency of the sampling process.
  • Efficient Outlier Rejection Scheme: Before computing hypotheses based on sampled points, PCR-99 conducts a prescreening based on triplet scale consistency. This mechanism effectively discards unsuitable samples early in the process, yielding a significant reduction in computational overhead.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

PCR-99 extensively evaluates point cloud datasets, demonstrating robust performance up to an outlier ratio of 99% and showcasing superior efficiency and robustness over existing state-of-the-art methods, especially in unknown-scale problems. This algorithm sets a new benchmark for outlier tolerance in point cloud registration tasks, offering substantial theoretical insights into deterministic sampling methods and outlier rejection mechanisms in correspondence-based registration processes. Its practical implications extend to improving the reliability and speed of 3D mapping, object recognition, and localization in environments heavily contaminated with outliers.

Algorithm Evaluation and Results

PCR-99's evaluation reveals it consistently outperforms current methods in terms of robustness and speed, particularly at the extreme outlier ratio of 99%. Its advantage becomes more pronounced in unknown-scale registration problems, highlighting its potential as a go-to solution for challenging PCR tasks. Notably, the algorithm showcases minimal performance degradation even as the outlier ratio approaches 99%, underscoring its exceptional outlier handling capability.

Future Developments in AI and Point Cloud Processing

The introduction of PCR-99 opens multiple avenues for future research and development in generative AI and point cloud processing:

  • Exploration of Hybrid Models: Combining deterministic sample prioritization with advanced machine learning models could further enhance outlier detection and inlier prioritization efficiency.
  • Real-time Processing: Optimizing PCR-99 for real-time applications in robotics and augmented reality could revolutionize how machines interact with their environments.
  • Scalability: Investigating the scalability of PCR-99's methodologies to handle increasingly large datasets is crucial for its adoption in large-scale 3D reconstruction projects.

Conclusion

PCR-99 represents a significant step forward in addressing the challenge of point cloud registration amidst extreme outlier conditions. Its novel deterministic sampling strategy and efficient outlier rejection mechanism pave the way for more reliable and swifter point cloud registration processes. As we continue to push the boundaries of what is possible in computer vision and 3D scene analysis, methodologies like PCR-99 will undoubtedly play a crucial role in shaping the future of technology and its applications.